All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	skannan@codeaurora.org, peterz@infradead.org,
	mturquette@baylibre.com, steve.muckle@linaro.org,
	vincent.guittot@linaro.org, morten.rasmussen@arm.com,
	dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/7] cpufreq: governors: Fix ABBA lockups
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 15:54:28 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160203155428.GY3947@e106622-lin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1454507872.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

Hi Viresh,

On 03/02/16 19:32, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
> 
> Here is the V2 with updated patches as suggested by you guys.
> 
> These are pushed here:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vireshk/pm.git cpufreq/governor-kobject
> 
> The first four patches are for 4.5, if possible and others you can keep
> for 4.6.
> 
> V1->V2:
> - Improved changelogs, thanks Rafael.
> - Added new dbs_data->mutex to avoid concurrent updates to tunables.
> - Moved kobj_type to common_dbs_data.
> - Updated macros to static inline routines
> - s/show/governor_show
> - s/store/governor_store
> - Improved comments
> 
> @Juri: More testing requested :)
> 

Ouch, I've just got this executing -f basic on Juno. :(
It happens with the hotplug_1_by_1 test.


[ 1086.531252] IRQ1 no longer affine to CPU1
[ 1086.531495] CPU1: shutdown
[ 1086.538199] psci: CPU1 killed.
[ 1086.583396]
[ 1086.584881] ======================================================
[ 1086.590999] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
[ 1086.597205] 4.5.0-rc2+ #37 Not tainted
[ 1086.600914] -------------------------------------------------------
[ 1086.607118] runme.sh/1052 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 1086.612031]  (sb_writers#7){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffc000249500>] __sb_start_write+0xcc/0xe0
[ 1086.620090]
[ 1086.620090] but task is already holding lock:
[ 1086.625865]  (&policy->rwsem){+++++.}, at: [<ffffffc0005c8ee4>] cpufreq_offline+0x7c/0x278
[ 1086.634081]
[ 1086.634081] which lock already depends on the new lock.
[ 1086.634081]
[ 1086.642180]
[ 1086.642180] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[ 1086.649589]
-> #1 (&policy->rwsem){+++++.}:
[ 1086.653929]        [<ffffffc00011d9a4>] check_prev_add+0x670/0x754
[ 1086.660060]        [<ffffffc00011e1ac>] validate_chain.isra.36+0x724/0xa0c
[ 1086.666876]        [<ffffffc00011f904>] __lock_acquire+0x4e4/0xba0
[ 1086.673001]        [<ffffffc000120b58>] lock_release+0x244/0x570
[ 1086.678955]        [<ffffffc0007351d0>] __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0xa0/0x18c
[ 1086.685771]        [<ffffffc0007352dc>] mutex_unlock+0x20/0x2c
[ 1086.691553]        [<ffffffc0002ccd24>] kernfs_fop_write+0xb0/0x194
[ 1086.697768]        [<ffffffc00024478c>] __vfs_write+0x48/0x104
[ 1086.703550]        [<ffffffc0002457a4>] vfs_write+0x98/0x198
[ 1086.709161]        [<ffffffc0002465e4>] SyS_write+0x54/0xb0
[ 1086.714684]        [<ffffffc000085d30>] el0_svc_naked+0x24/0x28
[ 1086.720555]
-> #0 (sb_writers#7){.+.+.+}:
[ 1086.724730]        [<ffffffc00011c574>] print_circular_bug+0x80/0x2e4
[ 1086.731116]        [<ffffffc00011d470>] check_prev_add+0x13c/0x754
[ 1086.737243]        [<ffffffc00011e1ac>] validate_chain.isra.36+0x724/0xa0c
[ 1086.744059]        [<ffffffc00011f904>] __lock_acquire+0x4e4/0xba0
[ 1086.750184]        [<ffffffc0001207f4>] lock_acquire+0xe4/0x204
[ 1086.756052]        [<ffffffc000118da0>] percpu_down_read+0x50/0xe4
[ 1086.762180]        [<ffffffc000249500>] __sb_start_write+0xcc/0xe0
[ 1086.768306]        [<ffffffc00026ae90>] mnt_want_write+0x28/0x54
[ 1086.774263]        [<ffffffc0002555f8>] do_last+0x660/0xcb8
[ 1086.779788]        [<ffffffc000255cdc>] path_openat+0x8c/0x2b0
[ 1086.785570]        [<ffffffc000256fbc>] do_filp_open+0x78/0xf0
[ 1086.791353]        [<ffffffc000244058>] do_sys_open+0x150/0x214
[ 1086.797222]        [<ffffffc0002441a0>] SyS_openat+0x3c/0x48
[ 1086.802831]        [<ffffffc000085d30>] el0_svc_naked+0x24/0x28
[ 1086.808700]
[ 1086.808700] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 1086.808700]
[ 1086.816627]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 1086.816627]
[ 1086.822488]        CPU0                    CPU1
[ 1086.826971]        ----                    ----
[ 1086.831453]   lock(&policy->rwsem);
[ 1086.834918]                                lock(sb_writers#7);
[ 1086.840713]                                lock(&policy->rwsem);
[ 1086.846671]   lock(sb_writers#7);
[ 1086.849972]
[ 1086.849972]  *** DEADLOCK ***
[ 1086.849972]
[ 1086.855836] 1 lock held by runme.sh/1052:
[ 1086.859802]  #0:  (&policy->rwsem){+++++.}, at: [<ffffffc0005c8ee4>] cpufreq_offline+0x7c/0x278
[ 1086.868453]
[ 1086.868453] stack backtrace:
[ 1086.872769] CPU: 5 PID: 1052 Comm: runme.sh Not tainted 4.5.0-rc2+ #37
[ 1086.879229] Hardware name: ARM Juno development board (r2) (DT)
[ 1086.885089] Call trace:
[ 1086.887511] [<ffffffc00008a788>] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x1f4
[ 1086.892858] [<ffffffc00008a99c>] show_stack+0x20/0x28
[ 1086.897861] [<ffffffc00041a380>] dump_stack+0x84/0xc0
[ 1086.902863] [<ffffffc00011c6c8>] print_circular_bug+0x1d4/0x2e4
[ 1086.908725] [<ffffffc00011d470>] check_prev_add+0x13c/0x754
[ 1086.914244] [<ffffffc00011e1ac>] validate_chain.isra.36+0x724/0xa0c
[ 1086.920448] [<ffffffc00011f904>] __lock_acquire+0x4e4/0xba0
[ 1086.925965] [<ffffffc0001207f4>] lock_acquire+0xe4/0x204
[ 1086.931224] [<ffffffc000118da0>] percpu_down_read+0x50/0xe4
[ 1086.936742] [<ffffffc000249500>] __sb_start_write+0xcc/0xe0
[ 1086.942260] [<ffffffc00026ae90>] mnt_want_write+0x28/0x54
[ 1086.947605] [<ffffffc0002555f8>] do_last+0x660/0xcb8
[ 1086.952520] [<ffffffc000255cdc>] path_openat+0x8c/0x2b0
[ 1086.957693] [<ffffffc000256fbc>] do_filp_open+0x78/0xf0
[ 1086.962865] [<ffffffc000244058>] do_sys_open+0x150/0x214
[ 1086.968123] [<ffffffc0002441a0>] SyS_openat+0x3c/0x48
[ 1086.973124] [<ffffffc000085d30>] el0_svc_naked+0x24/0x28
[ 1087.019315] Detected PIPT I-cache on CPU1
[ 1087.019373] CPU1: Booted secondary processor [410fd080]

Best,

- Juri

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-02-03 15:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-03 14:02 [PATCH V2 0/7] cpufreq: governors: Fix ABBA lockups Viresh Kumar
2016-02-03 14:02 ` [PATCH V2 1/7] cpufreq: governor: Treat min_sampling_rate as a governor-specific tunable Viresh Kumar
2016-02-05  2:31   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-05  2:47     ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-03 14:02 ` [PATCH V2 2/7] cpufreq: governor: New sysfs show/store callbacks for governor tunables Viresh Kumar
2016-02-03 16:17   ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-03 14:02 ` [PATCH V2 3/7] cpufreq: governor: Drop unused macros for creating governor tunable attributes Viresh Kumar
2016-02-03 14:02 ` [PATCH V2 4/7] Revert "cpufreq: Drop rwsem lock around CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT" Viresh Kumar
2016-02-03 14:02 ` [PATCH V2 5/7] cpufreq: Merge cpufreq_offline_prepare/finish routines Viresh Kumar
2016-02-03 20:21   ` Saravana Kannan
2016-02-04  1:49     ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-03 14:02 ` [PATCH V2 6/7] cpufreq: Call __cpufreq_governor() with policy->rwsem held Viresh Kumar
2016-02-03 14:02 ` [PATCH V2 7/7] cpufreq: Remove cpufreq_governor_lock Viresh Kumar
2016-02-04  6:43   ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-03 15:54 ` Juri Lelli [this message]
2016-02-03 16:10   ` [PATCH V2 0/7] cpufreq: governors: Fix ABBA lockups Viresh Kumar
2016-02-03 17:20     ` Juri Lelli
2016-02-03 17:20       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-03 23:31         ` Shilpa Bhat
2016-02-03 23:50           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-04  5:51             ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-04 11:09             ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-04 17:43               ` Saravana Kannan
2016-02-04 17:44                 ` Saravana Kannan
2016-02-04 18:18                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-05  2:44                     ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-05  3:54                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-05  9:49                       ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-08  2:20                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-06  2:22                       ` Saravana Kannan
2016-02-08  2:28                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-09 21:02                           ` Saravana Kannan
2016-02-04  6:24     ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-04 12:17       ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-04 20:50         ` Shilpasri G Bhat
2016-02-05  2:49           ` Viresh Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160203155428.GY3947@e106622-lin \
    --to=juri.lelli@arm.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=skannan@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=steve.muckle@linaro.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.