Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] Early release of -drive QemuOpts

[Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>]

Am 09.03.2016 um 13:20 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben:
> On 22/02/2016 15:39, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > In short, this patch gets rid of blockdev_mark_auto_del and
> > blockdev_auto_del.
> > 
> > With these patches, it is possible to create a new -drive with the same
> > id as soon as the DEVICE_DELETED event is delivered (which equals to
> > unrealize).
> > 
> > I'm sorry I'm not able to explain the history (and probably do not
> > understand the full ramifications) of this.  That's why this is just
> > an RFC.
> > 
> > The idea here is that reference counting the BlockBackend is enough to
> > defer the deletion of the block device as much as necessary; anticipating
> > the destruction of the DriveInfo is not a problem, and has the desired
> > effect of freeing the QemuOpts.
> > 
> > Patches 1 and 3 are mostly similar to the version I had earlier sent as
> > RFC, but they now pass all unit tests.  Patch 2 is new, but I don't know
> > of a test that fails it.
> > 
> > Paolo
> > 
> > Paolo Bonzini (3):
> >   block: detach devices from DriveInfo at unrealize time
> >   block: keep BlockBackend alive until device finalize time
> >   block: remove legacy_dinfo at blk_detach_dev time
> > 
> >  block/block-backend.c            | 13 +++++++++----
> >  blockdev.c                       | 28 +++++++++-------------------
> >  hw/block/virtio-blk.c            |  4 +++-
> >  hw/block/xen_disk.c              |  1 +
> >  hw/core/qdev-properties-system.c | 13 +++++++++++--
> >  hw/ide/piix.c                    |  3 +++
> >  hw/scsi/scsi-bus.c               |  4 +++-
> >  hw/usb/dev-storage.c             |  3 ++-
> >  include/sysemu/blockdev.h        |  5 ++---
> >  9 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
> > 
> 
> Ping?!?

Markus, can you please review this? You seem to have a better
understanding of DriveInfo and related magic.

Kevin