All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	cmilsted@redhat.com, Rafa?? Mi??ecki <zajec5@gmail.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>,
	m@bues.ch,
	"linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org" 
	<linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86/quirks: Add early quirk to reset Apple AirPort card
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 22:09:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160608200929.GA18981@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE9FiQVapnZ8akNWLo-c8sD4enA1qGcW50vmv7_-9g78Hsm4sg@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 11:56:14AM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 7:23 AM, tip-bot for Lukas Wunner <tipbot@zytor.com> wrote:
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c
> ...
> 
> Extend bus scan range part should be in separated patch?
> 
> and put apple_airport_reset() related in second patch.

I had considered that but decided against it as it would make things
a bit more complicated for stable maintainers.

Nevertheless I'll be happy to split in two if this is the consensus?
I'm not sure though if x86/urgent is a rebasing branch?


> > +
> > +       if ((type & 0x7f) == PCI_HEADER_TYPE_BRIDGE) {
> > +               sec = read_pci_config_byte(num, slot, func, PCI_SECONDARY_BUS);
> > +               early_pci_scan_bus(sec);
> 
> How do you know that sec is valid ?
> 
> How about on the system that have one bridge that still have sec num register 0?
> 
> it will be get into dead loop.

Good point. I've just checked pci_scan_bridge() and it does verify that
and avoids recursing to a child bus if it's number is zero. It also
ensures that sec > num before recursing.

I can provide a follow-up patch to fix that, will wait a bit though to
see if there are further comments.


> > -void __init early_quirks(void)
> > +static void __init early_pci_scan_bus(int bus)
> >  {
> >         int slot, func;
> >
> > -       if (!early_pci_allowed())
> > -               return;
> > -
> >         /* Poor man's PCI discovery */
> > -       /* Only scan the root bus */
> >         for (slot = 0; slot < 32; slot++)
> >                 for (func = 0; func < 8; func++) {
> >                         /* Only probe function 0 on single fn devices */
> > -                       if (check_dev_quirk(0, slot, func))
> > +                       if (check_dev_quirk(bus, slot, func))
> >                                 break;
> >                 }
> >  }
> > +
> > +void __init early_quirks(void)
> > +{
> > +       if (!early_pci_allowed())
> > +               return;
> > +
> > +       early_pci_scan_bus(0);
> > +}
> 
> Would just revert to scan domain 0, bus 0 to 255.

The commit message of 8659c406ade3 sounds like this would lengthen
boot time noticeably, so I expected significant backlash had I just
gone back to this old algorithm.

Thanks,

Lukas

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-08 20:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-28 23:35 [PATCH] x86: Add early quirk to reset Apple AirPort card Lukas Wunner
2016-05-28 23:35 ` Lukas Wunner
2016-06-02  9:48 ` Matt Fleming
2016-06-02  9:48   ` Matt Fleming
2016-06-08 14:23 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/quirks: " tip-bot for Lukas Wunner
2016-06-08 18:56   ` Yinghai Lu
2016-06-08 20:09     ` Lukas Wunner [this message]
2016-06-09  6:48       ` Ingo Molnar
2016-06-09 11:04         ` Lukas Wunner
2016-06-09 16:37           ` Yinghai Lu
2016-06-09 20:20             ` Lukas Wunner
2016-06-10  0:04               ` Yinghai Lu
2016-06-10 11:58                 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-06-10 12:16                   ` Lukas Wunner
2016-06-10 12:59                     ` Ingo Molnar
2016-06-10 13:59                       ` Lukas Wunner
2016-06-10 20:08                         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-12 11:13                           ` Lukas Wunner
2016-06-09 22:57 ` [PATCH] x86: " Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-09 22:57   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-12 10:31 [PATCH v2 3/3] x86/quirks: " Lukas Wunner
2016-07-10 19:01 ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Lukas Wunner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160608200929.GA18981@wunner.de \
    --to=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=cmilsted@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m@bues.ch \
    --cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    --cc=zajec5@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.