From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yuanhan Liu Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] vhost: optimize enqueue Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 22:01:52 +0800 Message-ID: <20160912140152.GH23158@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> References: <1471319402-112998-1-git-send-email-zhihong.wang@intel.com> <1473392368-84903-1-git-send-email-zhihong.wang@intel.com> <3a40c167-c21e-8cb6-33ae-6043cb13b463@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Zhihong Wang , dev@dpdk.org, thomas.monjalon@6wind.com To: Maxime Coquelin Return-path: Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0983E532C for ; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 16:01:21 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3a40c167-c21e-8cb6-33ae-6043cb13b463@redhat.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 03:52:12PM +0200, Maxime Coquelin wrote: > Just tried to apply your series without success. > Apparently, it is not based directly on master branch, > as it lacks some SHA-1 information. > > Could you rebase it against master please? It's rebased against the dpdk-next-virtio tree [0], where all the virtio/vhost patches are applied first. [0]: http://dpdk.org/browse/next/dpdk-next-virtio/ --yliu