All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: David Windsor <dave@progbits.org>
Cc: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@intel.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <h.peter.anvin@intel.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: [RFC v4 PATCH 00/13] HARDENED_ATOMIC
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 22:39:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161110213952.GB3117@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEXv5_i3Ju5JNs6g-jA-WkMR38g43Aj5we0+GXeHcuUAM3nziQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 04:23:08PM -0500, David Windsor wrote:
> Discussions have been occurring since KSPP has begun: do we need a

Note that I was not included in any of that. If you hide in a corner on
the intartubes don't be surprised people have no clue what you're on
about.

> specialized type for reference counters?  Oh, wait, we do: kref.
> Wait!  kref is implemented with atomic_t.
> 
> So, what?  We obviously need an atomicity for a reference counter
> type.  So, do we simply implement the HARDENED_ATOMIC protected
> version of atomic_t "inside" of kref and leave atomic_t alone?

But you could provide a small subset of the atomic_t API for that, under
a different type.

That way you don't get utter shite like atomic_cmpxchg_wrap() for
instance.

>From what I can see only all the add/sub variants have overflow checks,
but all the operations get _wrap() prefixes, even where it doesn't make
any bloody sense. _wrap() on bitops?, _wrap() on cmpxchg(). You must be
bloody joking right?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-11-10 21:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 104+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-10 20:24 [kernel-hardening] [RFC v4 PATCH 00/13] HARDENED_ATOMIC Elena Reshetova
2016-11-10 20:24 ` [kernel-hardening] [RFC v4 PATCH 01/13] Add architecture independent hardened atomic base Elena Reshetova
2016-11-10 20:41   ` [kernel-hardening] " David Windsor
2016-11-10 21:09     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-10 21:35   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-11  9:06     ` Reshetova, Elena
2016-11-10 20:24 ` [kernel-hardening] [RFC v4 PATCH 02/13] percpu-refcount: leave atomic counter unprotected Elena Reshetova
2016-11-10 20:24 ` [kernel-hardening] [RFC v4 PATCH 03/13] kernel: identify wrapping atomic usage Elena Reshetova
2016-11-10 21:58   ` [kernel-hardening] " Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-11  8:49     ` [kernel-hardening] " Reshetova, Elena
2016-11-19 13:28   ` [kernel-hardening] " Paul E. McKenney
2016-11-19 21:39     ` Kees Cook
2016-11-21 20:13       ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-11-10 20:24 ` [kernel-hardening] [RFC v4 PATCH 04/13] mm: " Elena Reshetova
2016-11-10 20:24 ` [kernel-hardening] [RFC v4 PATCH 05/13] fs: " Elena Reshetova
2016-11-10 20:24 ` [kernel-hardening] [RFC v4 PATCH 06/13] net: " Elena Reshetova
2016-11-10 20:24 ` [kernel-hardening] [RFC v4 PATCH 07/13] net: atm: " Elena Reshetova
2016-11-10 20:24 ` [kernel-hardening] [RFC v4 PATCH 08/13] security: " Elena Reshetova
2016-11-10 20:24 ` [kernel-hardening] [RFC v4 PATCH 09/13] drivers: identify wrapping atomic usage (part 1/2) Elena Reshetova
2016-11-10 21:48   ` [kernel-hardening] " Will Deacon
2016-11-11  8:57     ` [kernel-hardening] " Reshetova, Elena
2016-11-11 12:35       ` Mark Rutland
2016-11-10 20:24 ` [kernel-hardening] [RFC v4 PATCH 10/13] drivers: identify wrapping atomic usage (part 2/2) Elena Reshetova
2016-11-10 20:24 ` [kernel-hardening] [RFC v4 PATCH 11/13] x86: identify wrapping atomic usage Elena Reshetova
2016-11-10 20:24 ` [kernel-hardening] [RFC v4 PATCH 12/13] x86: implementation for HARDENED_ATOMIC Elena Reshetova
2016-11-10 20:40   ` [kernel-hardening] " Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-10 21:04     ` Kees Cook
2016-11-10 21:16       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-10 21:32         ` Kees Cook
2016-11-10 21:46           ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-10 22:50     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-10 23:07       ` Kees Cook
2016-11-10 23:30         ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-11  9:32           ` [kernel-hardening] " Reshetova, Elena
2016-11-11 10:29             ` [kernel-hardening] " Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-11 18:00           ` Kees Cook
2016-11-11 20:19             ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-10 21:33   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-11  9:20     ` [kernel-hardening] " Reshetova, Elena
2016-11-10 20:24 ` [kernel-hardening] [RFC v4 PATCH 13/13] lkdtm: add tests for atomic over-/underflow Elena Reshetova
2016-11-10 20:37 ` [RFC v4 PATCH 00/13] HARDENED_ATOMIC Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-10 20:37   ` [kernel-hardening] " Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-10 20:48   ` Will Deacon
2016-11-10 20:48     ` [kernel-hardening] " Will Deacon
2016-11-10 21:01     ` Kees Cook
2016-11-10 21:01       ` [kernel-hardening] " Kees Cook
2016-11-10 21:23       ` David Windsor
2016-11-10 21:27         ` Kees Cook
2016-11-10 21:27           ` Kees Cook
2016-11-10 21:39           ` David Windsor
2016-11-10 21:39             ` David Windsor
2016-11-10 21:39         ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2016-11-10 21:13     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-10 21:13       ` [kernel-hardening] " Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-10 21:23       ` Kees Cook
2016-11-10 21:23         ` [kernel-hardening] " Kees Cook
2016-11-11  4:25         ` Rik van Riel
2016-11-10 22:27       ` Greg KH
2016-11-10 23:15         ` Kees Cook
2016-11-10 23:15           ` Kees Cook
2016-11-10 23:38           ` Greg KH
2016-11-10 23:38             ` Greg KH
2016-11-11  7:50             ` David Windsor
2016-11-11 17:43               ` Kees Cook
2016-11-11 17:46                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-11 18:04                   ` Kees Cook
2016-11-11 20:17                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-14 20:31                       ` Kees Cook
2016-11-15  8:01                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-15 16:50                         ` Rik van Riel
2016-11-15 17:23                           ` Kees Cook
2016-11-16 17:09                             ` Rik van Riel
2016-11-16 17:32                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-16 17:41                                 ` Rik van Riel
2016-11-16 17:34                               ` Reshetova, Elena
2016-11-17  8:37                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-17  9:04                                   ` Reshetova, Elena
2016-11-17  9:36                                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-17  9:36                                   ` Julia Lawall
2016-11-17 10:16                                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-17 11:19                                       ` Mark Rutland
2016-11-17 11:32                                         ` Julia Lawall
2016-11-17 12:59                                       ` Julia Lawall
2016-11-11 18:47                   ` Mark Rutland
2016-11-11 19:39                     ` Will Deacon
2016-11-11 18:31                 ` Mark Rutland
2016-11-11 20:05                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-15 10:36                     ` Mark Rutland
2016-11-15 11:21                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-15 18:02                         ` Mark Rutland
2016-11-10 23:57           ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-10 23:57             ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-11  0:29             ` Colin Vidal
2016-11-11 12:41               ` Mark Rutland
2016-11-11 12:47                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-11 13:00                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-11 14:39                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-11-11 14:48                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-11 23:07                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-13 11:03             ` Greg KH
2016-11-13 11:03               ` Greg KH
2016-11-10 20:56   ` Kees Cook
2016-11-10 20:56     ` [kernel-hardening] " Kees Cook
2016-11-11  3:20     ` David Windsor

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161110213952.GB3117@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=dave@progbits.org \
    --cc=elena.reshetova@intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=h.peter.anvin@intel.com \
    --cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.