All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v3 2/5] package: add generic support for lz archives
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 08:32:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170216083206.2064b783@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83572997-616f-8bec-fadb-0a59bbf847ed@mind.be>

Hello,

On Wed, 15 Feb 2017 23:48:13 +0100, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote:

> >> +DEPENDENCIES_HOST_PREREQ += host-lzip
> >> ++EXTRACTOR_DEPENDENCY_PRECHECKED_EXTENSIONS += .lz
> >> +LZCAT = $(HOST_DIR)/usr/bin/lzip -d -c  
> > 
> > But here in the case where we are building our own host-lzip, we
> > completely ignore BR2_LZCAT, and use a hardcoded
> > $(HOST_DIR)/usr/bin/lzip -d -c.  
> 
>  Er, yes of course: if BR2_LZCAT doesn't work, then we use the Buildroot
> internal lzcat. What else did you expect?

BR2_LZCAT does not specify only the path to the lzcat program, but also
its options. And we completely ignore those custom options if the
lzcat built by Buildroot is used.

>  As I understand it, these options are provided in case you have an old build
> host and have locally installed these tools in e.g. your homedir. However, I
> wouldn't mind getting rid of these options completely, and instead require that
> they are in PATH.
> 
>  True, they could also be used to pass alternative options to the extractors,
> but I don't see much point of that. Or they could be used to call it in an
> alternative form, e.g. "zcat" instead of "gzip -d -c", or "busybox gzip -d -c".
> But I also don't see much point of that.
> 
>  While we're on the subject, I don't see much point of BR2_TAR_OPTIONS either.
> 
>  But of course, it's not as if keeping these things is such a burden. So I at
> least won't spend time in removing them.

See above why it doesn't make sense to me: BR2_LZCAT allows to specify
not only the path/name of the lzip program, but also its options. And
they get completely ignored when host-lzip is built by Buildroot.

Which means one person doing the build on a machine with lzip installed
locally will have BR2_LZCAT taken into account, and another person
doing the same build on a different machine that does not have lzip
installed will not have BR2_LZCAT taken into account.

This is definitely not very consistent IMO.

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-16  7:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-12 20:15 [Buildroot] [PATCH v3 1/5] package: refactor listing of extractor dependencies Baruch Siach
2017-02-12 20:15 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v3 2/5] package: add generic support for lz archives Baruch Siach
2017-02-14 13:43   ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2017-02-15 21:15   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-02-15 22:48     ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-02-16  7:32       ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2017-02-16  8:25         ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-02-16  8:34           ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-02-16 17:24             ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-02-16 17:41       ` Yann E. MORIN
2017-02-16 22:03         ` Peter Korsgaard
2017-02-16 22:11           ` Yann E. MORIN
2017-02-17  7:43             ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-02-17 17:07               ` Yann E. MORIN
2017-02-16 22:08       ` Peter Korsgaard
2017-02-16  8:36     ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2017-02-16  8:40       ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-02-16 10:24         ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2017-02-21 21:55   ` [Buildroot] Bug in "package: add generic support for lz archives" ? Thomas Petazzoni
2017-02-22  5:32     ` Baruch Siach
2017-02-22  8:03       ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-02-12 20:15 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v3 3/5] ed: use generic extract command Baruch Siach
2017-02-12 20:15 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v3 4/5] ddrescue: " Baruch Siach
2017-02-12 20:15 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v3 5/5] ocrad: " Baruch Siach
2017-02-14 13:42 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v3 1/5] package: refactor listing of extractor dependencies Thomas De Schampheleire
2017-02-14 21:39 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-02-15  7:04   ` Baruch Siach
2017-02-15 21:13 ` Thomas Petazzoni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170216083206.2064b783@free-electrons.com \
    --to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.