On Thu, 16 Feb 2017 23:11:22 -0800 Joe Perches wrote: > To enable eventual removal of pr_warning > > This makes pr_warn use consistent for arch/x86 > > Prior to this patch, there were 46 uses of pr_warning and > 122 uses of pr_warn in arch/x86 > > Miscellanea: > > o Coalesce a few formats and realign arguments > o Convert a couple of multiple line printks to single line > > Signed-off-by: Joe Perches > --- > arch/x86/kernel/amd_gart_64.c | 12 +++------ > arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++------------------ > arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic_noop.c | 2 +- > arch/x86/kernel/setup_percpu.c | 4 +-- > arch/x86/kernel/tboot.c | 15 ++++++----- > arch/x86/kernel/tsc_sync.c | 8 +++--- > arch/x86/mm/kmmio.c | 8 +++--- > arch/x86/mm/mmio-mod.c | 5 ++-- > arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 12 ++++----- > arch/x86/mm/numa_emulation.c | 6 ++--- > arch/x86/mm/testmmiotrace.c | 5 ++-- > arch/x86/oprofile/op_x86_model.h | 6 ++--- > arch/x86/platform/olpc/olpc-xo15-sci.c | 2 +- > arch/x86/platform/sfi/sfi.c | 3 +-- > arch/x86/xen/debugfs.c | 2 +- > arch/x86/xen/setup.c | 2 +- > 16 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-) > Hi, seems fine to me, even though I haven't been involved in the kernel side for years. For the hunks quoted below *only*: Reviewed-by: Pekka Paalanen > diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/kmmio.c b/arch/x86/mm/kmmio.c > index afc47f5c9531..ad70518cdcc7 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/mm/kmmio.c > +++ b/arch/x86/mm/kmmio.c > @@ -187,8 +187,8 @@ static int arm_kmmio_fault_page(struct kmmio_fault_page *f) > int ret; > WARN_ONCE(f->armed, KERN_ERR pr_fmt("kmmio page already armed.\n")); > if (f->armed) { > - pr_warning("double-arm: addr 0x%08lx, ref %d, old %d\n", > - f->addr, f->count, !!f->old_presence); > + pr_warn("double-arm: addr 0x%08lx, ref %d, old %d\n", > + f->addr, f->count, !!f->old_presence); > } > ret = clear_page_presence(f, true); > WARN_ONCE(ret < 0, KERN_ERR pr_fmt("arming at 0x%08lx failed.\n"), > @@ -335,8 +335,8 @@ static int post_kmmio_handler(unsigned long condition, struct pt_regs *regs) > * something external causing them (f.e. using a debugger while > * mmio tracing enabled), or erroneous behaviour > */ > - pr_warning("unexpected debug trap on CPU %d.\n", > - smp_processor_id()); > + pr_warn("unexpected debug trap on CPU %d\n", > + smp_processor_id()); > goto out; > } > > diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/mmio-mod.c b/arch/x86/mm/mmio-mod.c > index bef36622e408..706ae44d1af7 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/mm/mmio-mod.c > +++ b/arch/x86/mm/mmio-mod.c > @@ -407,7 +407,7 @@ static void enter_uniprocessor(void) > } > out: > if (num_online_cpus() > 1) > - pr_warning("multiple CPUs still online, may miss events.\n"); > + pr_warn("multiple CPUs still online, may miss events\n"); > } > > static void leave_uniprocessor(void) > @@ -431,8 +431,7 @@ static void leave_uniprocessor(void) > static void enter_uniprocessor(void) > { > if (num_online_cpus() > 1) > - pr_warning("multiple CPUs are online, may miss events. " > - "Suggest booting with maxcpus=1 kernel argument.\n"); > + pr_warn("multiple CPUs are online, may miss events. Suggest booting with maxcpus=1 kernel argument.\n"); > } > > static void leave_uniprocessor(void) > diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/testmmiotrace.c b/arch/x86/mm/testmmiotrace.c > index 38868adf07ea..4a55e453296d 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/mm/testmmiotrace.c > +++ b/arch/x86/mm/testmmiotrace.c > @@ -121,9 +121,8 @@ static int __init init(void) > return -ENXIO; > } > > - pr_warning("WARNING: mapping %lu kB @ 0x%08lx in PCI address space, " > - "and writing 16 kB of rubbish in there.\n", > - size >> 10, mmio_address); > + pr_warn("WARNING: mapping %lu kB @ 0x%08lx in PCI address space, and writing 16 kB of rubbish in there\n", > + size >> 10, mmio_address); > do_test(size); > do_test_bulk_ioremapping(); > pr_info("All done.\n"); Thanks, pq