Hi,

On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 03:24:15PM -0700, Liam Breck wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 3:02 PM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On 23-03-17 22:31, Liam Breck wrote:
> >> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 7:55 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> If the charger gets unplugged before the battery is fully charged we will
> >>> get a one time Input fault. Ignore this rather then logging a message for
> >>> it. Likewise on the next interrupt after the one time Input fault all
> >>> fault flags will be 0, do not log a message when there are no faults.
> >>>
> >>> This fixes messages like these getting logged on charger unplug + replug:
> >>> bq24190-charger 15-006b: Fault: boost 0, charge 1, battery 0, ntc 0
> >>> bq24190-charger 15-006b: Fault: boost 0, charge 0, battery 0, ntc 0
> >>>
> >>> Cc: Liam Breck <kernel@networkimprov.net>
> >>> Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> Changes in v2:
> >>> -This is a new patch in v2 of this patch-set
> >>> ---
> >>>  drivers/power/supply/bq24190_charger.c | 17 +++++++++++------
> >>>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/bq24190_charger.c
> >>> b/drivers/power/supply/bq24190_charger.c
> >>> index b535f24..351e020 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/power/supply/bq24190_charger.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/power/supply/bq24190_charger.c
> >>> @@ -1189,12 +1189,17 @@ static void bq24190_check_status(struct
> >>> bq24190_dev_info *bdi)
> >>>         } while (f_reg && ++i < 2);
> >>>
> >>>         if (f_reg != bdi->f_reg) {
> >>> -               dev_info(bdi->dev,
> >>> -                       "Fault: boost %d, charge %d, battery %d, ntc
> >>> %d\n",
> >>> -                       !!(f_reg & BQ24190_REG_F_BOOST_FAULT_MASK),
> >>> -                       !!(f_reg & BQ24190_REG_F_CHRG_FAULT_MASK),
> >>> -                       !!(f_reg & BQ24190_REG_F_BAT_FAULT_MASK),
> >>> -                       !!(f_reg & BQ24190_REG_F_NTC_FAULT_MASK));
> >>> +               /*
> >>> +                * Don't spam the logs if all faults are cleared, or when
> >>> the
> >>> +                * cable providing Vbus gets unplugged.
> >>> +                */
> >>> +               if  (f_reg && f_reg != (1 <<
> >>> BQ24190_REG_F_CHRG_FAULT_SHIFT))
> >>
> >>
> >> if (f_reg && ((ss_reg & BQ24190_REG_SS_PG_STAT_MASK) ||
> >>     f_reg != (1 << BQ24190_REG_F_CHRG_FAULT_SHIFT)) )
> >
> >
> > Sebastian has already merged the original patch into his for-next branch,
> > please
> > provide a patch on top.
> 
> I recall Sebastian merging and then dropping a commit from the other
> series I'm working on.

Yeah, I thought it was a fix, but it was useless without the
remaining series.

> I'll return to the charger once the dependency for my charger patchset
> is merged. I just got a big change request for that.

Ok.

> 
> >>> +                       dev_info(bdi->dev,
> 
> This should probably be dev_warn now.

makes sense to me.

FWIW I think a follow-up commit for this is enough, but I can also
swap the existing commit.

-- Sebastian

> >>> +                               "Fault: boost %d, charge %d, battery %d,
> >>> ntc %d\n",
> >>> +                               !!(f_reg &
> >>> BQ24190_REG_F_BOOST_FAULT_MASK),
> >>> +                               !!(f_reg &
> >>> BQ24190_REG_F_CHRG_FAULT_MASK),
> >>> +                               !!(f_reg & BQ24190_REG_F_BAT_FAULT_MASK),
> >>> +                               !!(f_reg &
> >>> BQ24190_REG_F_NTC_FAULT_MASK));
> >>>
> >>>                 mutex_lock(&bdi->f_reg_lock);
> >>>                 if ((bdi->f_reg & battery_mask_f) != (f_reg &
> >>> battery_mask_f))
> >>> --
> >>> 2.9.3
> >>>
> >