From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53381) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ctU11-0006l8-Ky for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 02:57:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ctU0x-0006TB-P2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 02:57:03 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:47024) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ctU0x-0006Sm-JJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 02:56:59 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B9BB624B3 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 06:56:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 14:56:52 +0800 From: Peter Xu Message-ID: <20170330065652.GH20667@pxdev.xzpeter.org> References: <20170323204544.12015-1-quintela@redhat.com> <20170323204544.12015-31-quintela@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170323204544.12015-31-quintela@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 30/51] ram: Move src_page_req* to RAMState List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Juan Quintela Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, dgilbert@redhat.com On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 09:45:23PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote: > This are the last postcopy fields still at MigrationState. Once there s/This/These/ > Move MigrationSrcPageRequest to ram.c and remove MigrationState > parameters where appropiate. > > Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela Reviewed-by: Peter Xu One question below though... [...] > @@ -1191,19 +1204,18 @@ static bool get_queued_page(RAMState *rs, MigrationState *ms, > * > * It should be empty at the end anyway, but in error cases there may > * xbe some left. > - * > - * @ms: current migration state > */ > -void flush_page_queue(MigrationState *ms) > +void flush_page_queue(void) > { > - struct MigrationSrcPageRequest *mspr, *next_mspr; > + struct RAMSrcPageRequest *mspr, *next_mspr; > + RAMState *rs = &ram_state; > /* This queue generally should be empty - but in the case of a failed > * migration might have some droppings in. > */ > rcu_read_lock(); Could I ask why we are taking the RCU read lock rather than the mutex here? > - QSIMPLEQ_FOREACH_SAFE(mspr, &ms->src_page_requests, next_req, next_mspr) { > + QSIMPLEQ_FOREACH_SAFE(mspr, &rs->src_page_requests, next_req, next_mspr) { > memory_region_unref(mspr->rb->mr); > - QSIMPLEQ_REMOVE_HEAD(&ms->src_page_requests, next_req); > + QSIMPLEQ_REMOVE_HEAD(&rs->src_page_requests, next_req); > g_free(mspr); > } > rcu_read_unlock(); Thanks, -- peterx