From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix numabalancing to work with isolated cpus
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 12:13:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170406101348.GH5497@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170406092329.52zzkxlkvitnh44c@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Thu 06-04-17 11:23:29, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 09:34:36AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> > I would really like to see it confirmed by the scheduler maintainers and
> > documented properly as well. What you are claiming here is rather
> > surprising to my understanding of what isolcpus acutally is.
>
> isolcpus gets you a set of fully partitioned CPUs. What's surprising
> about that?
Well, I thought that all isolated cpus simply form their own scheduling
domain which is isolated from the general workload on the system
(kthreads, softirqs etc...).
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-06 10:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-04 17:27 [PATCH] sched: Fix numabalancing to work with isolated cpus Srikar Dronamraju
2017-04-04 18:56 ` Rik van Riel
2017-04-04 20:37 ` Mel Gorman
2017-04-05 1:50 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2017-04-05 8:09 ` Mel Gorman
2017-04-05 12:57 ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-05 15:22 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2017-04-05 16:44 ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-06 7:19 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2017-04-06 7:34 ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-06 9:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-04-06 10:13 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2017-04-06 10:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-04-06 10:42 ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-06 10:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-04-06 13:44 ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-06 7:36 ` Mike Galbraith
2017-04-06 7:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170406101348.GH5497@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.