From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
To: Kiran Gunda <kgunda@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Abhijeet Dharmapurikar <adharmap@codeaurora.org>,
Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Subbaraman Narayanamurthy <subbaram@codeaurora.org>,
David Collins <collinsd@codeaurora.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
adharmap@quicinc.com, aghayal@qti.qualcomm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 15/15] spmi: pmic-arb: instantiate spmi_devices at arch_initcall
Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 15:07:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170531220729.GI20170@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1496147943-25822-16-git-send-email-kgunda@codeaurora.org>
On 05/30, Kiran Gunda wrote:
> @@ -1384,7 +1384,12 @@ static int spmi_pmic_arb_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> .of_match_table = spmi_pmic_arb_match_table,
> },
> };
> -module_platform_driver(spmi_pmic_arb_driver);
> +
> +int __init spmi_pmic_arb_init(void)
Missing static.
> +{
> + return platform_driver_register(&spmi_pmic_arb_driver);
> +}
> +arch_initcall(spmi_pmic_arb_init);
We also lost module removal. Probably nobody tests it, but still
no mention of that in commit text.
I'm not sure we need this at all though. Is there something that
needs to probe early? Indicating what that is in the commit text
would be helpful.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-31 22:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-30 12:38 [PATCH V1 00/15]: support for spmi_pmic_arb v3/v5 and bug fixes Kiran Gunda
2017-05-30 12:38 ` Kiran Gunda
2017-05-30 12:38 ` [PATCH V1 01/15] spmi: pmic_arb: block access of invalid read and writes Kiran Gunda
2017-05-31 0:33 ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-12 11:26 ` kgunda
2017-06-13 2:09 ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-14 15:09 ` kgunda
2017-05-30 12:38 ` [PATCH V1 02/15] spmi: pmic-arb: rename spmi_pmic_arb_dev to spmi_pmic_arb Kiran Gunda
2017-05-31 0:46 ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-01 16:11 ` kgunda
2017-06-02 18:29 ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-05 6:28 ` kgunda
2017-05-30 12:38 ` [PATCH V1 03/15] spmi: pmic-arb: fix inconsistent use of apid and chan Kiran Gunda
2017-05-31 1:31 ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-01 16:37 ` kgunda
2017-05-30 12:38 ` [PATCH V1 04/15] spmi: pmic-arb: optimize table lookups Kiran Gunda
2017-05-31 1:44 ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-01 16:53 ` kgunda
2017-06-02 18:31 ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-05 6:33 ` kgunda
2017-05-30 12:38 ` [PATCH V1 05/15] spmi: pmic-arb: cleanup unrequested irqs Kiran Gunda
2017-05-31 1:57 ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-06 10:50 ` kgunda
2017-06-13 2:11 ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-14 15:04 ` kgunda
2017-05-30 12:38 ` [PATCH V1 06/15] spmi: pmic-arb: fix missing interrupts Kiran Gunda
2017-05-31 2:00 ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-01 17:06 ` kgunda
2017-05-30 12:38 ` [PATCH V1 07/15] spmi: pmic-arb: clear the latched status of the interrupt Kiran Gunda
2017-05-31 22:03 ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-06 10:55 ` kgunda
2017-05-30 12:38 ` [PATCH V1 08/15] spmi: pmic_arb: use appropriate flow handler Kiran Gunda
2017-05-31 19:03 ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-06 10:57 ` kgunda
2017-05-30 12:38 ` [PATCH V1 09/15] spmi: pmic-arb: check apid enabled before calling the handler Kiran Gunda
2017-05-31 20:39 ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-14 15:38 ` kgunda
2017-06-16 21:11 ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-21 5:02 ` kgunda
2017-05-30 12:38 ` [PATCH V1 10/15] spmi: pmic_arb: add support for PMIC bus arbiter v3 Kiran Gunda
2017-05-31 22:18 ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-06 11:10 ` kgunda
2017-05-30 12:38 ` [PATCH V1 11/15] spmi: spmi-pmic-arb: enable the SPMI interrupt as a wakeup source Kiran Gunda
2017-05-31 17:13 ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-08 11:30 ` kgunda
2017-05-30 12:39 ` [PATCH V1 12/15] spmi-pmic-arb: fix a possible null pointer dereference Kiran Gunda
2017-05-31 17:29 ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-02 7:13 ` kgunda
2017-05-30 12:39 ` [PATCH V1 13/15] spmi: pmic-arb: add support for HW version 5 Kiran Gunda
2017-06-01 6:08 ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-08 11:28 ` kgunda
2017-05-30 12:39 ` [PATCH V1 14/15] spmi: pmic-arb: do not ack and clear peripheral interrupts in cleanup_irq Kiran Gunda
2017-05-30 22:23 ` kbuild test robot
2017-05-30 22:23 ` kbuild test robot
2017-05-31 17:53 ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-02 7:26 ` kgunda
2017-06-06 11:27 ` kgunda
2017-06-13 2:10 ` Stephen Boyd
2017-07-18 11:53 ` kgunda
2017-05-30 12:39 ` [PATCH V1 15/15] spmi: pmic-arb: instantiate spmi_devices at arch_initcall Kiran Gunda
2017-05-31 22:07 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2017-07-18 11:49 ` kgunda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170531220729.GI20170@codeaurora.org \
--to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=adharmap@codeaurora.org \
--cc=adharmap@quicinc.com \
--cc=aghayal@qti.qualcomm.com \
--cc=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=collinsd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kgunda@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=subbaram@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.