All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Filter out spurious execlists context-switch interrupts
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 21:06:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171023200616.16714-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171023200616.16714-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

Back in commit a4b2b01523a8 ("drm/i915: Don't mark an execlists
context-switch when idle") we noticed the presence of late
context-switch interrupts. We were able to filter those out by looking
at whether the ELSP remained active, but in commit beecec901790
("drm/i915/execlists: Preemption!") that became problematic as we now
anticipate receiving a context-switch event for preemption while ELSP
may be empty. To restore the spurious interrupt suppression, add a
counter for the expected number of pending context-switches and skip if
we do not need to handle this interrupt to make forward progress.

v2: Don't forget to switch on for preempt.
v3: Reduce the counter to a on/off boolean tracker. Declare the HW as
active when we first submit, and idle after the final completion event
(with which we confirm the HW says it is idle), and track each source
of activity separately. With a finite number of sources, it should us
debug which gets stuck.

Fixes: beecec901790 ("drm/i915/execlists: Preemption!")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michal Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Arkadiusz Hiler <arkadiusz.hiler@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c |  3 +++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c            |  6 ++++--
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c     |  5 +++--
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c           | 27 ++++++++++++++++++------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h    | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 5 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
index a2e8114b739d..f84c267728fd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
@@ -610,6 +610,7 @@ static void i915_guc_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 	execlists->first = rb;
 	if (submit) {
 		port_assign(port, last);
+		execlists_set_active(execlists, EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_USER);
 		i915_guc_submit(engine);
 	}
 	spin_unlock_irq(&engine->timeline->lock);
@@ -633,6 +634,8 @@ static void i915_guc_irq_handler(unsigned long data)
 
 		rq = port_request(&port[0]);
 	}
+	if (!rq)
+		execlists_clear_active(execlists, EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_USER);
 
 	if (!port_isset(last_port))
 		i915_guc_dequeue(engine);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
index b1296a55c1e4..f8205841868b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
@@ -1388,8 +1388,10 @@ gen8_cs_irq_handler(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, u32 iir, int test_shift)
 	bool tasklet = false;
 
 	if (iir & (GT_CONTEXT_SWITCH_INTERRUPT << test_shift)) {
-		__set_bit(ENGINE_IRQ_EXECLIST, &engine->irq_posted);
-		tasklet = true;
+		if (READ_ONCE(engine->execlists.active)) {
+			__set_bit(ENGINE_IRQ_EXECLIST, &engine->irq_posted);
+			tasklet = true;
+		}
 	}
 
 	if (iir & (GT_RENDER_USER_INTERRUPT << test_shift)) {
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
index a47a9c6bea52..ab5bf4e2e28e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
@@ -1548,8 +1548,8 @@ bool intel_engine_is_idle(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 	if (test_bit(ENGINE_IRQ_EXECLIST, &engine->irq_posted))
 		return false;
 
-	/* Both ports drained, no more ELSP submission? */
-	if (port_request(&engine->execlists.port[0]))
+	/* Waiting to drain ELSP? */
+	if (READ_ONCE(engine->execlists.active))
 		return false;
 
 	/* ELSP is empty, but there are ready requests? */
@@ -1749,6 +1749,7 @@ void intel_engine_dump(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, struct drm_printer *m)
 					   idx);
 			}
 		}
+		drm_printf(m, "\t\tHW active? 0x%x\n", execlists->active);
 		rcu_read_unlock();
 	} else if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) > 6) {
 		drm_printf(m, "\tPP_DIR_BASE: 0x%08x\n",
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
index 7f45dd7dc3e5..233c992a886b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
@@ -575,7 +575,8 @@ static void execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 			 * the state of the GPU is known (idle).
 			 */
 			inject_preempt_context(engine);
-			execlists->preempt = true;
+			execlists_set_active(execlists,
+					     EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_PREEMPT);
 			goto unlock;
 		} else {
 			/*
@@ -683,8 +684,10 @@ static void execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 unlock:
 	spin_unlock_irq(&engine->timeline->lock);
 
-	if (submit)
+	if (submit) {
+		execlists_set_active(execlists, EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_USER);
 		execlists_submit_ports(engine);
+	}
 }
 
 static void
@@ -696,6 +699,7 @@ execlist_cancel_port_requests(struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists)
 	while (num_ports-- && port_isset(port)) {
 		struct drm_i915_gem_request *rq = port_request(port);
 
+		GEM_BUG_ON(!execlists->active);
 		execlists_context_status_change(rq, INTEL_CONTEXT_SCHEDULE_PREEMPTED);
 		i915_gem_request_put(rq);
 
@@ -861,15 +865,21 @@ static void intel_lrc_irq_handler(unsigned long data)
 				unwind_incomplete_requests(engine);
 				spin_unlock_irq(&engine->timeline->lock);
 
-				GEM_BUG_ON(!execlists->preempt);
-				execlists->preempt = false;
+				GEM_BUG_ON(!execlists_is_active(execlists,
+								EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_PREEMPT));
+				execlists_clear_active(execlists,
+						       EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_PREEMPT);
 				continue;
 			}
 
 			if (status & GEN8_CTX_STATUS_PREEMPTED &&
-			    execlists->preempt)
+			    execlists_is_active(execlists,
+					       EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_PREEMPT))
 				continue;
 
+			GEM_BUG_ON(!execlists_is_active(execlists,
+							EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_USER));
+
 			/* Check the context/desc id for this event matches */
 			GEM_DEBUG_BUG_ON(buf[2 * head + 1] != port->context_id);
 
@@ -892,6 +902,9 @@ static void intel_lrc_irq_handler(unsigned long data)
 			/* After the final element, the hw should be idle */
 			GEM_BUG_ON(port_count(port) == 0 &&
 				   !(status & GEN8_CTX_STATUS_ACTIVE_IDLE));
+			if (port_count(port) == 0)
+				execlists_clear_active(execlists,
+						       EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_USER);
 		}
 
 		if (head != execlists->csb_head) {
@@ -901,7 +914,7 @@ static void intel_lrc_irq_handler(unsigned long data)
 		}
 	}
 
-	if (!execlists->preempt)
+	if (!execlists_is_active(execlists, EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_PREEMPT))
 		execlists_dequeue(engine);
 
 	intel_uncore_forcewake_put(dev_priv, execlists->fw_domains);
@@ -1460,7 +1473,7 @@ static int gen8_init_common_ring(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 		   GT_CONTEXT_SWITCH_INTERRUPT << engine->irq_shift);
 	clear_bit(ENGINE_IRQ_EXECLIST, &engine->irq_posted);
 	execlists->csb_head = -1;
-	execlists->preempt = false;
+	execlists->active = 0;
 
 	/* After a GPU reset, we may have requests to replay */
 	if (!i915_modparams.enable_guc_submission && execlists->first)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
index 17186f067408..51bc704bf413 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
@@ -241,9 +241,17 @@ struct intel_engine_execlists {
 	} port[EXECLIST_MAX_PORTS];
 
 	/**
-	 * @preempt: are we currently handling a preempting context switch?
+	 * @active: is the HW active? We consider the HW as active after
+	 * submitted any context for execution until we have seen the last
+	 * context completion event. After that, we do not expect any more
+	 * events until we submit, and so can park the HW.
+	 *
+	 * As we have a small number of different sources from which we feed
+	 * the HW, we track the state of each inside a single bitfield.
 	 */
-	bool preempt;
+	unsigned int active;
+#define EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_USER 0
+#define EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_PREEMPT 1
 
 	/**
 	 * @port_mask: number of execlist ports - 1
@@ -525,6 +533,27 @@ struct intel_engine_cs {
 	u32 (*get_cmd_length_mask)(u32 cmd_header);
 };
 
+static inline void
+execlists_set_active(struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists,
+		     unsigned int bit)
+{
+	__set_bit(bit, (unsigned long *)&execlists->active);
+}
+
+static inline void
+execlists_clear_active(struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists,
+		       unsigned int bit)
+{
+	__clear_bit(bit, (unsigned long *)&execlists->active);
+}
+
+static inline bool
+execlists_is_active(const struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists,
+		    unsigned int bit)
+{
+	return test_bit(bit, (unsigned long *)&execlists->active);
+}
+
 static inline unsigned int
 execlists_num_ports(const struct intel_engine_execlists * const execlists)
 {
@@ -538,6 +567,7 @@ execlists_port_complete(struct intel_engine_execlists * const execlists,
 	const unsigned int m = execlists->port_mask;
 
 	GEM_BUG_ON(port_index(port, execlists) != 0);
+	GEM_BUG_ON(!execlists_is_active(execlists, EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_USER));
 
 	memmove(port, port + 1, m * sizeof(struct execlist_port));
 	memset(port + m, 0, sizeof(struct execlist_port));
-- 
2.15.0.rc1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-23 20:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-23 20:06 [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Bump wait-times for the final CS interrupt before parking Chris Wilson
2017-10-23 20:06 ` Chris Wilson [this message]
2017-10-23 21:12   ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Filter out spurious execlists context-switch interrupts Chris Wilson
2017-10-23 20:26 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915: Bump wait-times for the final CS interrupt before parking Patchwork
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-10-20  9:59 [PATCH 1/2] " Chris Wilson
2017-10-20  9:59 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Filter out spurious execlists context-switch interrupts Chris Wilson
2017-10-20 13:21   ` Mika Kuoppala
2017-10-20 13:24     ` Chris Wilson
2017-10-20 13:31       ` Mika Kuoppala
2017-10-20 13:47         ` Chris Wilson
2017-10-20 13:59   ` Mika Kuoppala
2017-10-20 14:24     ` Chris Wilson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171023200616.16714-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --to=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=mika.kuoppala@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.