Re: [PATCH] Fix resume on x86-32 machines

From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Andrew Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix resume on x86-32 machines
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 23:22:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171214222248.GA784@amd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFxj0_F4Fcs-_1zUP0pXEr6DZqENc7pKUf4unE06Zs8iug@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1074 bytes --]

On Thu 2017-12-14 12:47:56, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> wrote:
> >
> > But given this is already "regression fix for x86-64 caused regression
> > on x86-32", I really believe we should merge trivial fix now, and do
> > the cleanups / nicer fixes sometime later?
> 
> The fix patch was already posted, but in another thread (confusingly
> with _almost_ the same subject: "Re: Linux 4.15-rc2: Regression in
> resume from ACPI S3").
> 
> Here:
> 
>   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/luto/linux.git/commit/?h=x86/fixes
> 
> but it hasn't actually gotten to me yet (I think Luto made a new
> version where he split it up into three smaller patches, and I'm
> assuming it's in one of the -tip trees heading for me asap).

Ok.. It did not apply cleanly. ... but I see fresh patches in my
inbox, let me test those.

Best regards,
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]