All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	byungchul.park@lge.com, kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 7/8] rcu: trace CleanupMore condition only if needed
Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 20:47:33 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180515034733.GZ26088@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180515010131.GF209519@joelaf.mtv.corp.google.com>

On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 06:01:31PM -0700, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 12:20:28PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 08:15:40PM -0700, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> > > Currently the tree RCU clean up code records a CleanupMore trace event
> > > even if the GP was already in progress. This makes CleanupMore show up
> > > twice for no reason. Avoid it.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
> > 
> > Good catch, and I applied this patch.  I did rework the commit log
> > a bit, so please look it over to make sure I didn't mess it up.
> > 
> > 							Thanx, Paul
> > 
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > commit 52c4e689efd975f5383895b1bc1b91bc90fdd372
> > Author: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
> > Date:   Sun May 13 20:15:40 2018 -0700
> > 
> >     rcu: Produce last "CleanupMore" trace only if late-breaking request
> >     
> >     Currently the tree RCU clean-up code records a "CleanupMore" trace
> >     event in response to late-arriving grace-period requests even if the
> >     grace period was already requested. This makes "CleanupMore" show up an
> >     extra time (in addition to once for each rcu_node structure that was
> >     previously marked with the request) for no good reason.  This commit
> >     therefore avoids emitting this trace message unless the only if the only
> >     request for this next grace period arrived during or after the cleanup
> >     scan of the rcu_node structures.
> 
> Yes, this is fine except "unless the only if the only" should be "unless the".

I did update this after sending, and I still have "the the".  Will fix on
next rebase.  As my daughter recently reminded me, the Law of Conservation
of Bugs.  ;-)

							Thanx, Paul

> thanks,
> 
> - Joel
> 
> >     
> >     Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
> >     Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > index 8063a0478870..de6447dd73de 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > @@ -2072,7 +2072,7 @@ static void rcu_gp_cleanup(struct rcu_state *rsp)
> >  	rsp->gp_state = RCU_GP_IDLE;
> >  	/* Check for GP requests since above loop. */
> >  	rdp = this_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda);
> > -	if (ULONG_CMP_LT(rnp->gp_seq, rnp->gp_seq_needed)) {
> > +	if (!needgp && ULONG_CMP_LT(rnp->gp_seq, rnp->gp_seq_needed)) {
> >  		trace_rcu_this_gp(rnp, rdp, rnp->gp_seq_needed,
> >  				  TPS("CleanupMore"));
> >  		needgp = true;
> > 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-15  3:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-14  3:15 [PATCH RFC 0/8] rcu fixes, clean ups for rcu/dev Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-05-14  3:15 ` [PATCH RFC 1/8] rcu: Add comment documenting how rcu_seq_snap works Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-05-14  3:47   ` Randy Dunlap
2018-05-14  5:05     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-14 17:38   ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15  1:51     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-15  3:59       ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15  7:02         ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-15 12:55           ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15 18:41             ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-15 19:08               ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15 22:55                 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-16 15:45                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-16 23:21                     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-14  3:15 ` [PATCH RFC 2/8] rcu: Clarify usage of cond_resched for tasks-RCU Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-05-14 14:54   ` Steven Rostedt
2018-05-14 17:22     ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15  0:35       ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-15  3:42         ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-14  3:15 ` [PATCH RFC 3/8] rcu: Add back the cpuend tracepoint Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-05-14 18:12   ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15  0:43     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-14  3:15 ` [PATCH RFC 4/8] rcu: Get rid of old c variable from places in tree RCU Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-05-14 17:57   ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15  0:41     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-14  3:15 ` [PATCH RFC 5/8] rcu: Use rcu_node as temporary variable in funnel locking loop Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-05-14 18:00   ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15  0:43     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-14  3:15 ` [PATCH RFC 6/8] rcu: Add back the Startedleaf tracepoint Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-05-14 18:38   ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15  0:57     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-15  3:46       ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15 23:04         ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-16 15:48           ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-16 23:13             ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-14  3:15 ` [PATCH RFC 7/8] rcu: trace CleanupMore condition only if needed Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-05-14 19:20   ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15  1:01     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-15  3:47       ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2018-05-14  3:15 ` [PATCH RFC 8/8] rcu: Fix cpustart tracepoint gp_seq number Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-05-14 20:33   ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15  1:02     ` Joel Fernandes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180515034733.GZ26088@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=byungchul.park@lge.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.