From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: Taniya Das <tdas@codeaurora.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org>,
Amit Nischal <anischal@codeaurora.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, skannan@codeaurora.org,
amit.kucheria@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: cpufreq: Introduce QCOM CPUFREQ FW bindings
Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 11:18:46 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180523054846.zn7gftt6aqyibd26@vireshk-i7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180522193139.GA21623@rob-hp-laptop>
On 22-05-18, 14:31, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 11:04:50PM +0530, Taniya Das wrote:
> > + freq-domain-0 {
> > + compatible = "cpufreq";
> > + reg = <0x17d43920 0x4>,
> > + <0x17d43110 0x500>,
> > + <0x17d41000 0x4>;
> > + reg-names = "perf_base", "lut_base", "en_base";
> > + qcom,cpulist = <&CPU0 &CPU1 &CPU2 &CPU3>;
I was thinking, can't we add platform specific properties in the CPU
nodes ? If yes, then we can point the phandle of fw node from the CPUs
and this awkward list can go away.
--
viresh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-23 5:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-19 17:34 [PATCH v2 0/2] Add support for QCOM cpufreq FW driver Taniya Das
2018-05-19 17:34 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: cpufreq: Introduce QCOM CPUFREQ FW bindings Taniya Das
2018-05-22 19:31 ` Rob Herring
2018-05-23 5:48 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2018-05-23 14:18 ` Rob Herring
2018-05-24 5:18 ` Taniya Das
2018-05-24 5:43 ` Viresh Kumar
2018-05-28 7:29 ` Taniya Das
2018-05-23 15:13 ` Sudeep Holla
2018-05-24 5:46 ` Taniya Das
2018-05-19 17:34 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] cpufreq: qcom-fw: Add support for QCOM cpufreq FW driver Taniya Das
2018-05-21 9:01 ` Viresh Kumar
2018-05-21 19:06 ` skannan
2018-05-22 10:43 ` Taniya Das
2018-05-23 5:54 ` Viresh Kumar
2018-05-21 6:05 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] " Viresh Kumar
2018-05-21 7:35 ` Taniya Das
2018-05-21 9:02 ` Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180523054846.zn7gftt6aqyibd26@vireshk-i7 \
--to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=amit.kucheria@linaro.org \
--cc=anischal@codeaurora.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=rnayak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=skannan@codeaurora.org \
--cc=tdas@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.