From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Lunn Subject: Re: [PATCH v0 03/12] mlxsw: core: Add core environment module for port temperature reading Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 22:18:03 +0200 Message-ID: <20180621201803.GD10038@lunn.ch> References: <1529594883-20619-1-git-send-email-vadimp@mellanox.com> <1529594883-20619-4-git-send-email-vadimp@mellanox.com> <20180621171120.GA6830@lunn.ch> <20180621183440.GA10038@lunn.ch> <20180621194917.GC10038@lunn.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Guenter Roeck , "davem@davemloft.net" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "jiri@resnulli.us" To: Vadim Pasternak Return-path: Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([185.16.172.187]:38942 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932938AbeFUUSI (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jun 2018 16:18:08 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > It means I will have 64 thermal zones for each module (actually for the > some coming new systems will support 128 modules, plus thermal zone > for ASIC ambient temperatures. > And each zone will try to control same PWM. > As I result PWM will be extremely jumpy and non-effective. Hi Vadim Please repost to the correct lists, and ask the experts how this should be done. netdev is not the right place to discuss this. Andrew