On Fri 2018-06-29 14:26:00, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 11:46:07AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > 
> > > > Finally, note that documentation (including kerneldoc) remains to be
> > > > written, but hopefully this will not hinder review given that the
> > > > current interfaces are fairly self-describing.
> > > 
> > > This all looks great.  Thanks for doing this work and adding a new
> > > subsystem for something that has been asked for for many years.
> > > 
> > > All now merged in my tree, nice job!
> > 
> > I don't think discussion was finished on this one.
> 
> It looked done to me as there was only a single set of patches, with no
> other working patches submitted from anyone else.

Is "noone submitted patches on top" sufficient reason to apply the patch?

> If this turns out to be a "bad" api, then we can deal with it then, but
> for now let's try this out.

Series uses /dev/gnss0 , without providing hardware abstraction,
blocking place for proper gnss layer. Suggested fix is to to make it
"/dev/gnssraw0". How do you propose to fix this after it is merged?

									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html