From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: rostedt@goodmis.org (Steven Rostedt) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 09:19:44 -0400 Subject: [PATCH v9 5/7] tracing: Centralize preemptirq tracepoints and unify their usage In-Reply-To: <20180711131256.GH2476@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20180628182149.226164-1-joel@joelfernandes.org> <20180628182149.226164-6-joel@joelfernandes.org> <20180711131256.GH2476@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> Message-ID: <20180711091944.4d8e78ef@gandalf.local.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-ID: <20180711131944.WenCiBATjbq779pmvQQjyLG9VgXAr4k6r6XcXjHeJy4@z> On Wed, 11 Jul 2018 15:12:56 +0200 Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, Jun 28, 2018@11:21:47AM -0700, Joel Fernandes wrote: > > One note, I have to check for lockdep recursion in the code that calls > > the trace events API and bail out if we're in lockdep recursion > > I'm not seeing any new lockdep_recursion checks... I believe he's talking about this part: +void trace_hardirqs_on(void) +{ + if (lockdep_recursing(current) || !this_cpu_read(tracing_irq_cpu)) + return; + [etc] > > > protection to prevent something like the following case: a spin_lock is > > taken. Then lockdep_acquired is called. That does a raw_local_irq_save > > and then sets lockdep_recursion, and then calls __lockdep_acquired. In > > this function, a call to get_lock_stats happens which calls > > preempt_disable, which calls trace IRQS off somewhere which enters my > > tracepoint code and sets the tracing_irq_cpu flag to prevent recursion. > > This flag is then never cleared causing lockdep paths to never be > > entered and thus causing splats and other bad things. > > Would it not be much easier to avoid that entirely, afaict all > get/put_lock_stats() callers already have IRQs disabled, so that > (traced) preempt fiddling is entirely superfluous. Agreed. Looks like a good clean up. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html