From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: joel@joelfernandes.org (Joel Fernandes) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 13:29:32 -0700 Subject: [PATCH v9 4/7] tracepoint: Make rcuidle tracepoint callers use SRCU In-Reply-To: <20180712161538.0737ba7f@gandalf.local.home> References: <20180628182149.226164-1-joel@joelfernandes.org> <20180628182149.226164-5-joel@joelfernandes.org> <20180711124954.GE2476@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20180711090003.42596c2b@gandalf.local.home> <20180711142744.GN3593@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20180711104618.05dc4b46@gandalf.local.home> <20180711205249.GA32091@joelaf.mtv.corp.google.com> <20180711232120.5dbfa1c7@vmware.local.home> <20180712042825.GA154647@joelaf.mtv.corp.google.com> <20180712093512.1f612a24@gandalf.local.home> <20180712191701.GA107829@joelaf.mtv.corp.google.com> <20180712161538.0737ba7f@gandalf.local.home> Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-ID: <20180712202932.e7yUDR_O2lr-pcK2R4MnsCfOUzhjKhoLHLC1wqsa914@z> On Thu, Jul 12, 2018@1:15 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Thu, 12 Jul 2018 12:17:01 -0700 >> So then, we should use the regular variant for this additional check you're >> suggesting. > > OK, I thought we had a rcu_dereference_notrace() that did checks and > thought that this followed suit, but it appears there is no such call. > That's where my confusion was. > > Sure, I'll nuke the notrace() portion, thanks. > > Also, I've applied 1-3, since 4 and 5 looks to be getting a remake, I'm > going to remove them from my queue. Please fold the SPDX patch into 5. Will do, and send out the 4 and 5 shortly with the SPDK folded. Also the kselftest patches were acked and can be taken independently, I had reposted them as a separate 2 patch series with some minor changes based on your suggestions. Could you check them? thanks! - Joel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html