All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>
To: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	dm-devel@redhat.com, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Matias Bjorling <matias.bjorling@wdc.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 03/11] scsi: sd_zbc: Fix sd_zbc_check_zones() error checks
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 19:08:42 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181012100850.23316-4-damien.lemoal@wdc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181012100850.23316-1-damien.lemoal@wdc.com>

The unsigned 32 bits overflow check for the zone size value is already
done within sd_zbc_check_zones() with the test:

} else if (logical_to_sectors(sdkp->device, zone_blocks) > UINT_MAX) {

so there is no need to check again for an out of range value in
sd_zbc_read_zones(). Simplify the code and fix sd_zbc_check_zones()
error return to -EFBIG instead of -ENODEV if the zone size is too large.
Change the return type of sd_zbc_check_zones() to an int for the error
code and return the zone size (zone_blocks) through a u32 pointer to
avoid overflowing the signed 32 return value.

Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>
---
 drivers/scsi/sd_zbc.c | 19 ++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd_zbc.c b/drivers/scsi/sd_zbc.c
index ca73c46931c0..0678e1e108b0 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/sd_zbc.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/sd_zbc.c
@@ -373,7 +373,7 @@ static int sd_zbc_check_zoned_characteristics(struct scsi_disk *sdkp,
  * Returns the zone size in number of blocks upon success or an error code
  * upon failure.
  */
-static s64 sd_zbc_check_zones(struct scsi_disk *sdkp)
+static int sd_zbc_check_zones(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, u32 *zblocks)
 {
 	u64 zone_blocks = 0;
 	sector_t max_lba, block = 0;
@@ -381,7 +381,7 @@ static s64 sd_zbc_check_zones(struct scsi_disk *sdkp)
 	unsigned char *rec;
 	unsigned int buf_len;
 	unsigned int list_length;
-	s64 ret;
+	int ret;
 	u8 same;
 
 	/* Get a buffer */
@@ -472,9 +472,10 @@ static s64 sd_zbc_check_zones(struct scsi_disk *sdkp)
 		if (sdkp->first_scan)
 			sd_printk(KERN_NOTICE, sdkp,
 				  "Zone size too large\n");
-		ret = -ENODEV;
+		ret = -EFBIG;
 	} else {
-		ret = zone_blocks;
+		*zblocks = zone_blocks;
+		ret = 0;
 	}
 
 out_free:
@@ -668,7 +669,7 @@ static int sd_zbc_setup(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, u32 zone_blocks)
 
 int sd_zbc_read_zones(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, unsigned char *buf)
 {
-	int64_t zone_blocks;
+	u32 zone_blocks;
 	int ret;
 
 	if (!sd_is_zoned(sdkp))
@@ -687,12 +688,8 @@ int sd_zbc_read_zones(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, unsigned char *buf)
 	 * Check zone size: only devices with a constant zone size (except
 	 * an eventual last runt zone) that is a power of 2 are supported.
 	 */
-	zone_blocks = sd_zbc_check_zones(sdkp);
-	ret = -EFBIG;
-	if (zone_blocks != (u32)zone_blocks)
-		goto err;
-	ret = zone_blocks;
-	if (ret < 0)
+	ret = sd_zbc_check_zones(sdkp, &zone_blocks);
+	if (ret != 0)
 		goto err;
 
 	/* The drive satisfies the kernel restrictions: set it up */
-- 
2.17.1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-10-12 10:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-12 10:08 [PATCH v4 00/11] Zoned block device support improvements Damien Le Moal
2018-10-12 10:08 ` [PATCH v4 01/11] scsi: sd_zbc: Rearrange code Damien Le Moal
2018-10-16  4:48   ` Martin K. Petersen
2018-10-16  4:48     ` Martin K. Petersen
2018-10-12 10:08 ` [PATCH v4 02/11] scsi: sd_zbc: Reduce boot device scan and revalidate time Damien Le Moal
2018-10-16  4:50   ` Martin K. Petersen
2018-10-16  4:50     ` Martin K. Petersen
2018-10-12 10:08 ` Damien Le Moal [this message]
2018-10-12 10:23   ` [PATCH v4 03/11] scsi: sd_zbc: Fix sd_zbc_check_zones() error checks Hannes Reinecke
2018-10-12 10:23     ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-10-12 11:41     ` Damien Le Moal
2018-10-12 11:41       ` Damien Le Moal
2018-10-16  4:51   ` Martin K. Petersen
2018-10-16  4:51     ` Martin K. Petersen
2018-10-17  7:21   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-17  7:21     ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-12 10:08 ` [PATCH v4 04/11] block: Introduce blkdev_nr_zones() helper Damien Le Moal
2018-10-12 10:08 ` [PATCH v4 05/11] block: Limit allocation of zone descriptors for report zones Damien Le Moal
2018-10-12 10:08 ` [PATCH v4 06/11] block: Introduce BLKGETZONESZ ioctl Damien Le Moal
2018-10-12 10:08 ` [PATCH v4 07/11] block: Introduce BLKGETNRZONES ioctl Damien Le Moal
2018-10-12 10:08 ` [PATCH v4 08/11] block: Improve zone reset execution Damien Le Moal
2018-10-12 10:08 ` [PATCH v4 09/11] block: Expose queue nr_zones in sysfs Damien Le Moal
2018-10-12 10:08 ` [PATCH v4 10/11] block: add a report_zones method Damien Le Moal
2018-10-16  4:55   ` Martin K. Petersen
2018-10-16  4:55     ` Martin K. Petersen
2018-10-16 15:17   ` Mike Snitzer
2018-10-16 15:17     ` Mike Snitzer
2018-10-12 10:08 ` [PATCH v4 11/11] block: Introduce blk_revalidate_disk_zones() Damien Le Moal
2018-10-16  5:00   ` Martin K. Petersen
2018-10-16  5:00     ` Martin K. Petersen
2018-10-16 15:17   ` Mike Snitzer
2018-10-16 15:17     ` Mike Snitzer
2018-10-13 22:43 ` [PATCH v4 00/11] Zoned block device support improvements Jens Axboe
2018-10-15  0:45   ` Damien Le Moal
2018-10-15  0:45     ` Damien Le Moal
2018-10-16  2:34     ` Jens Axboe
2018-10-16  3:43       ` Damien Le Moal
2018-10-16  3:43         ` Damien Le Moal
2018-10-18  7:57       ` Damien Le Moal
2018-10-18  7:57         ` Damien Le Moal
2018-10-23 15:59 ` Jens Axboe
2018-10-24  2:26   ` Martin K. Petersen
2018-10-24  2:26     ` Martin K. Petersen
2018-10-24 15:03     ` Mike Snitzer
2018-10-24 15:03       ` Mike Snitzer
2018-10-24 15:37       ` Martin K. Petersen
2018-10-24 15:37         ` Martin K. Petersen
2018-10-24 16:04         ` Bart Van Assche
2018-10-24 16:04           ` Bart Van Assche
2018-10-25 14:30           ` Jens Axboe
2018-10-25 14:30             ` Jens Axboe
2018-10-24  8:04   ` Damien Le Moal
2018-10-24  8:04     ` Damien Le Moal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181012100850.23316-4-damien.lemoal@wdc.com \
    --to=damien.lemoal@wdc.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=matias.bjorling@wdc.com \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.