All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
	vincent.guittot@linaro.org, morten.rasmussen@arm.com,
	Dietmar.Eggemann@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] sched/fair: Skip LLC nohz logic for asymmetric systems
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2019 17:14:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190206161452.GL17550@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190117153411.2390-6-valentin.schneider@arm.com>

On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 03:34:11PM +0000, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> The LLC nohz condition will become true as soon as >=2 CPUs in a
> single LLC domain are busy. On big.LITTLE systems, this translates to
> two or more CPUs of a "cluster" (big or LITTLE) being busy.
> 
> Issuing a nohz kick in these conditions isn't desired for asymmetric
> systems, as if the busy CPUs can provide enough compute capacity to
> the running tasks, then we can leave the nohz CPUs in peace.
> 
> Skip the LLC nohz condition for asymmetric systems, and rely on
> nr_running & capacity checks to trigger nohz kicks when the system
> actually needs them.
> 
> Suggested-by: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/fair.c | 12 ++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 291dfdb0183f..ff27bf56e8d4 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -9545,6 +9545,17 @@ static void nohz_balancer_kick(struct rq *rq)
>  	}
>  
>  	rcu_read_lock();
> +
> +	if (static_branch_unlikely(&sched_asym_cpucapacity))
> +		/*
> +		 * For asymmetric systems, we do not want to nicely balance
> +		 * cache use, instead we want to embrace asymmetry and only
> +		 * ensure tasks have enough CPU capacity.
> +		 *
> +		 * Skip the LLC logic because it's not relevant in that case.
> +		 */
> +		goto check_capacity;
> +
>  	sds = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_llc_shared, cpu));
>  	if (sds) {
>  		/*

Since (before this) the actual order of the various tests doesn't
matter, it's a logical cascade of conditions for which to KICK_MASK.

We can easily reorder and short-circuit the cascase like so, no?

The only concern is if sd_llc_shared < sd_asym_capacity; in which case
we just lost a balance opportunity. Not sure how to best retain that
though.

--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -9568,25 +9568,6 @@ static void nohz_balancer_kick(struct rq
 	}
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
-	sds = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_llc_shared, cpu));
-	if (sds) {
-		/*
-		 * If there is an imbalance between LLC domains (IOW we could
-		 * increase the overall cache use), we need some less-loaded LLC
-		 * domain to pull some load. Likewise, we may need to spread
-		 * load within the current LLC domain (e.g. packed SMT cores but
-		 * other CPUs are idle). We can't really know from here how busy
-		 * the others are - so just get a nohz balance going if it looks
-		 * like this LLC domain has tasks we could move.
-		 */
-		nr_busy = atomic_read(&sds->nr_busy_cpus);
-		if (nr_busy > 1) {
-			flags = NOHZ_KICK_MASK;
-			goto unlock;
-		}
-
-	}
-
 	sd = rcu_dereference(rq->sd);
 	if (sd) {
 		/*
@@ -9600,6 +9581,20 @@ static void nohz_balancer_kick(struct rq
 		}
 	}
 
+	sd = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_asym_packing, cpu));
+	if (sd) {
+		/*
+		 * When ASYM_PACKING; see if there's a more preferred CPU going
+		 * idle; in which case, kick the ILB to move tasks around.
+		 */
+		for_each_cpu_and(i, sched_domain_span(sd), nohz.idle_cpus_mask) {
+			if (sched_asym_prefer(i, cpu)) {
+				flags = NOHZ_KICK_MASK;
+				goto unlock;
+			}
+		}
+	}
+
 	sd = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_asym_cpucapacity, cpu));
 	if (sd) {
 		/*
@@ -9610,21 +9605,36 @@ static void nohz_balancer_kick(struct rq
 			flags = NOHZ_KICK_MASK;
 			goto unlock;
 		}
+
+		/*
+		 * For asymmetric systems, we do not want to nicely balance
+		 * cache use, instead we want to embrace asymmetry and only
+		 * ensure tasks have enough CPU capacity.
+		 *
+		 * Skip the LLC logic because it's not relevant in that case.
+		 */
+		goto unlock;
 	}
 
-	sd = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_asym_packing, cpu));
-	if (sd) {
+	sds = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_llc_shared, cpu));
+	if (sds) {
 		/*
-		 * When ASYM_PACKING; see if there's a more preferred CPU going
-		 * idle; in which case, kick the ILB to move tasks around.
+		 * If there is an imbalance between LLC domains (IOW we could
+		 * increase the overall cache use), we need some less-loaded LLC
+		 * domain to pull some load. Likewise, we may need to spread
+		 * load within the current LLC domain (e.g. packed SMT cores but
+		 * other CPUs are idle). We can't really know from here how busy
+		 * the others are - so just get a nohz balance going if it looks
+		 * like this LLC domain has tasks we could move.
 		 */
-		for_each_cpu_and(i, sched_domain_span(sd), nohz.idle_cpus_mask) {
-			if (sched_asym_prefer(i, cpu)) {
-				flags = NOHZ_KICK_MASK;
-				goto unlock;
-			}
+		nr_busy = atomic_read(&sds->nr_busy_cpus);
+		if (nr_busy > 1) {
+			flags = NOHZ_KICK_MASK;
+			goto unlock;
 		}
+
 	}
+
 unlock:
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 out:

  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-06 16:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-17 15:34 [PATCH 0/5] sched/fair: NOHZ cleanups and misfit improvement Valentin Schneider
2019-01-17 15:34 ` [PATCH 1/5] sched/fair: Use for_each_cpu_and for asym-packing nohz kicks Valentin Schneider
2019-02-11 10:50   ` [tip:sched/core] sched/fair: Simplify nohz_balancer_kick() tip-bot for Valentin Schneider
2019-01-17 15:34 ` [PATCH 2/5] sched/fair: Explain LLC nohz kick condition Valentin Schneider
2019-02-11 10:51   ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Valentin Schneider
2019-01-17 15:34 ` [PATCH 3/5] sched/fair: Prune nohz_balancer_kick() comment block Valentin Schneider
2019-02-11 10:51   ` [tip:sched/core] sched/fair: Prune, fix and simplify the " tip-bot for Valentin Schneider
2019-01-17 15:34 ` [PATCH 4/5] sched/fair: Tune down misfit nohz kicks Valentin Schneider
2019-02-06 16:04   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-06 17:25     ` Valentin Schneider
2019-02-07  9:57       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-01-17 15:34 ` [PATCH 5/5] sched/fair: Skip LLC nohz logic for asymmetric systems Valentin Schneider
2019-02-06 16:14   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2019-02-06 17:26     ` Valentin Schneider
2019-02-07  9:56       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-07 11:31         ` Valentin Schneider
2019-02-06 14:33 ` [PATCH 0/5] sched/fair: NOHZ cleanups and misfit improvement Valentin Schneider

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190206161452.GL17550@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=Dietmar.Eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.