All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, austin_bolen@dell.com,
	alex_gagniuc@dellteam.com, keith.busch@intel.com,
	Shyam_Iyer@Dell.com, okaya@kernel.org,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI/LINK: bw_notification: Do not leave interrupt handler NULL
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 20:25:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190319192550.5lxfm3h2jnaip3on@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190319011214.7847-1-mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>

On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 08:12:04PM -0500, Alexandru Gagniuc wrote:
> A threaded IRQ with a NULL handler does not work with level-triggered
> interrupts. request_threaded_irq() will return an error:
> 
>   genirq: Threaded irq requested with handler=NULL and !ONESHOT for irq 16
>   pcie_bw_notification: probe of 0000:00:1b.0:pcie010 failed with error -22
> 
> For level interrupts we need to silence the interrupt before exiting
> the IRQ handler, so just clear the PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_LBMS bit there.
> 
> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>

I've tested this on my Ivy Bridge MacBook Pro which uses INTx on root and
downstream ports and I'm not seeing probe errors, so:

Tested-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>


> @@ -67,8 +77,8 @@ static irqreturn_t pcie_bw_notification_handler(int irq, void *context)
>  		__pcie_print_link_status(dev, false);
>  	up_read(&pci_bus_sem);
>  
> +	pcie_capability_read_word(port, PCI_EXP_LNKSTA, &link_status);
>  	pcie_update_link_speed(port->subordinate, link_status);
> -	pcie_capability_write_word(port, PCI_EXP_LNKSTA, events);
>  	return IRQ_HANDLED;
>  }

I'd suggest leaving the call to pcie_update_link_speed() in
pcie_bw_notification_irq() to avoid the duplicate read of the
Link Status register.

With that addressed,
Reviewed-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>

Thanks,

Lukas

  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-19 19:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-08 17:31 [GIT PULL] PCI changes for v5.1 Bjorn Helgaas
2019-03-09 23:15 ` pr-tracker-bot
2019-03-17 21:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-03-18  0:22   ` Alex G
2019-03-18  4:33     ` Lukas Wunner
2019-03-19  1:12   ` [PATCH] PCI/LINK: bw_notification: Do not leave interrupt handler NULL Alexandru Gagniuc
2019-03-19 19:25     ` Lukas Wunner [this message]
2019-03-19 20:00     ` Keith Busch
2019-03-20 13:46     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-03-20 13:48       ` Alex G.
2019-03-20 19:35         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-03-23  0:36           ` [PATCH v2] " Alexandru Gagniuc
2019-03-25 22:25             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-03-25 22:26               ` Alex G.
2019-03-25 22:59               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-04-19 21:08               ` Alex Williamson
2019-04-19 21:25                 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-04-22 21:11                 ` Alex Williamson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190319192550.5lxfm3h2jnaip3on@wunner.de \
    --to=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=Shyam_Iyer@Dell.com \
    --cc=alex_gagniuc@dellteam.com \
    --cc=austin_bolen@dell.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mr.nuke.me@gmail.com \
    --cc=okaya@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.