From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5992C43219 for ; Wed, 1 May 2019 20:23:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66A262089E for ; Wed, 1 May 2019 20:23:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b="U4OGHwg8" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726285AbfEAUXE (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 May 2019 16:23:04 -0400 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([185.16.172.187]:51479 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726096AbfEAUXD (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 May 2019 16:23:03 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch; s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=qv3nzSNeLpbWrzH4SE4vhOD1NlSAiKmEircDdM74DhU=; b=U4OGHwg8R+r5f4UXcfFFKEbGAq ng7R+hJ7efk7TZKXl8mgnBWXXGAWMEzaTm5nQg8WwI6pKXWkNx8c4kOnShLBWluSd3E7d4jG0T17t Py55U3K3piYJREyu9uyJ0oCO7zqf2ZeRFPbaaRff+NNl38HqTTSk77I8fGLlQu+RuCtg=; Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hLvkp-0008CT-Sj; Wed, 01 May 2019 22:22:59 +0200 Date: Wed, 1 May 2019 22:22:59 +0200 From: Andrew Lunn To: Rasmus Villemoes Cc: Vivien Didelot , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "David S. Miller" , Florian Fainelli , Rasmus Villemoes Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/5] net: dsa: prepare mv88e6xxx_g1_atu_op() for the mv88e6250 Message-ID: <20190501202259.GD19809@lunn.ch> References: <20190501193126.19196-1-rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk> <20190501193126.19196-4-rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190501193126.19196-4-rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 01, 2019 at 07:32:12PM +0000, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > All the currently supported chips have .num_databases either 256 or > 4096, so this patch does not change behaviour for any of those. The > mv88e6250, however, has .num_databases == 64, and it does not put the > upper two bits in ATU control 13:12, but rather in ATU Operation > 9:8. So change the logic to prepare for supporting mv88e6250. > > Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn Andrew