On 06/07, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> The crc core code can cope with some late crc, the race is kinda
> unavoidable. So no need to flush pending workers, they'll complete in
> time.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
> Cc: Rodrigo Siqueira <rodrigosiqueiramelo@gmail.com>
> Cc: Haneen Mohammed <hamohammed.sa@gmail.com>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_crc.c | 3 ---
>  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_crc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_crc.c
> index 96806cd35ad4..9d15e5e85830 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_crc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_crc.c
> @@ -249,9 +249,6 @@ int vkms_set_crc_source(struct drm_crtc *crtc, const char *src_name)
>  
>  	ret = vkms_crc_parse_source(src_name, &enabled);
>  
> -	/* make sure nothing is scheduled on crtc workq */
> -	flush_workqueue(out->crc_workq);
> -
>  	spin_lock_irq(&out->lock);
>  	out->crc_enabled = enabled;
>  	spin_unlock_irq(&out->lock);
> -- 
> 2.20.1
> 
Hi,

I tried to apply this patch, but git complained about it. I fixed the
problem manually (it was very simple), but I noticed that dim did not
add the tag "Link". Because of this, I decided to check with you before
I apply this patch. Is it ok to fix conflict without dim? Is it ok apply
a patch without the tag Link?

-- 
Rodrigo Siqueira
https://siqueira.tech