All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>,
	Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@suse.com>,
	Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/3] tools: bpftool: probe features for unprivileged users
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 15:45:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200429144506.8999-1-quentin@isovalent.com> (raw)

This set allows unprivileged users to probe available features with
bpftool. On Daniel's suggestion, the "unprivileged" keyword must be passed
on the command line to avoid accidentally dumping a subset of the features
supported by the system. When used by root, this keyword makes bpftool drop
the CAP_SYS_ADMIN capability and print the features available to
unprivileged users only.

The first patch makes a variable global in feature.c to avoid piping too
many booleans through the different functions. The second patch introduces
the unprivileged probing, adding a dependency to libcap. Then the third
patch makes this dependency optional, by restoring the initial behaviour
(root only can probe features) if the library is not available.

Cc: Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@suse.com>
Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>

v3: Update help message for bpftool feature probe ("unprivileged").

v2: Add "unprivileged" keyword, libcap check (patches 1 and 3 are new).

Quentin Monnet (3):
  tools: bpftool: for "feature probe" define "full_mode" bool as global
  tools: bpftool: allow unprivileged users to probe features
  tools: bpftool: make libcap dependency optional

 .../bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-feature.rst |  12 +-
 tools/bpf/bpftool/Makefile                    |  13 +-
 tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool     |   2 +-
 tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c                   | 143 +++++++++++++++---
 4 files changed, 143 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

-- 
2.20.1


             reply	other threads:[~2020-04-29 14:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-29 14:45 Quentin Monnet [this message]
2020-04-29 14:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/3] tools: bpftool: for "feature probe" define "full_mode" bool as global Quentin Monnet
2020-04-29 14:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/3] tools: bpftool: allow unprivileged users to probe features Quentin Monnet
2020-04-29 14:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 3/3] tools: bpftool: make libcap dependency optional Quentin Monnet
2020-04-29 20:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/3] tools: bpftool: probe features for unprivileged users John Fastabend
2020-04-29 23:14 ` Daniel Borkmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200429144506.8999-1-quentin@isovalent.com \
    --to=quentin@isovalent.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rpalethorpe@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.