All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@matbug.net>,
	Chris Redpath <chris.redpath@arm.com>,
	Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/3] sched/uclamp: Fix a deadlock when enabling uclamp static key
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 11:50:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200724105006.g42lu4a4g6pvusl4@e107158-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200724104120.GY10769@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On 07/24/20 12:41, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 10:46:50AM +0100, Qais Yousef wrote:
> > On 07/24/20 11:12, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 12:03:47PM +0100, Qais Yousef wrote:
> > > 
> > > I've trimmed the Changelog to read like:
> > 
> > +1
> > 
> > Should we mention the ordering issue too? Or maybe I misinterpreted the
> > 'Possible unsafe locking scenario' part?
> 
> The lock inversion was, imo, secondary. It only existed because of the
> impossible lock ordering -- taking a blocking lock inside an atomic
> lock. Fixing the first, avoids the second etc.. So I left it out.
> 
> > This should work, but you'll need to sprinkle ifdef around the key. Or move it
> > to uclamp_validate()
> 
> Indeed, the patch now reads like:

Maybe s/deadlock/splat/ in the subject now? I clearly focused on the secondary
thing..

Sorry you had to modify the patch that much yourself.

Thanks!

--
Qais Yousef

> 
> ---
> Subject: sched/uclamp: Fix a deadlock when enabling uclamp static key
> From: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 12:03:47 +0100
> 
> From: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
> 
> The following splat was caught when setting uclamp value of a task:
> 
>   BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at ./include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:49
> 
>    cpus_read_lock+0x68/0x130
>    static_key_enable+0x1c/0x38
>    __sched_setscheduler+0x900/0xad8
> 
> Fix by ensuring we enable the key outside of the critical section in
> __sched_setscheduler()
> 
> Fixes: 46609ce22703 ("sched/uclamp: Protect uclamp fast path code with static key")
> Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200716110347.19553-4-qais.yousef@arm.com
> ---
>  kernel/sched/core.c |   11 +++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -1252,6 +1252,15 @@ static int uclamp_validate(struct task_s
>  	if (upper_bound > SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * We have valid uclamp attributes; make sure uclamp is enabled.
> +	 *
> +	 * We need to do that here, because enabling static branches is a
> +	 * blocking operation which obviously cannot be done while holding
> +	 * scheduler locks.
> +	 */
> +	static_branch_enable(&sched_uclamp_used);
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -1282,8 +1291,6 @@ static void __setscheduler_uclamp(struct
>  	if (likely(!(attr->sched_flags & SCHED_FLAG_UTIL_CLAMP)))
>  		return;
>  
> -	static_branch_enable(&sched_uclamp_used);
> -
>  	if (attr->sched_flags & SCHED_FLAG_UTIL_CLAMP_MIN) {
>  		uclamp_se_set(&p->uclamp_req[UCLAMP_MIN],
>  			      attr->sched_util_min, true);

  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-24 10:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-16 11:03 [PATCH v7 0/3] sched/uclamp: new sysctl for default RT boost value Qais Yousef
2020-07-16 11:03 ` [PATCH v7 1/3] sched/uclamp: Add a new sysctl to control RT default " Qais Yousef
2020-07-24  8:54   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-24  9:16     ` Qais Yousef
2020-07-29 12:02   ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Qais Yousef
2020-07-16 11:03 ` [PATCH v7 2/3] Documentation/sysctl: Document uclamp sysctl knobs Qais Yousef
2020-07-29 12:02   ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Qais Yousef
2020-07-16 11:03 ` [PATCH v7 3/3] sched/uclamp: Fix a deadlock when enabling uclamp static key Qais Yousef
2020-07-16 11:13   ` Qais Yousef
2020-07-23 15:51     ` Qais Yousef
2020-07-24  9:12   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-24  9:46     ` Qais Yousef
2020-07-24 10:41       ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-24 10:50         ` Qais Yousef [this message]
2020-07-29 12:02   ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Qais Yousef

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200724105006.g42lu4a4g6pvusl4@e107158-lin.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=qais.yousef@arm.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=chris.redpath@arm.com \
    --cc=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=patrick.bellasi@matbug.net \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.