All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, will@kernel.org
Cc: npiggin@gmail.com, elver@google.com, jgross@suse.com,
	paulmck@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
	joel@joelfernandes.org, svens@linux.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	peterz@infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/9] lockdep: Use raw_cpu_*() for per-cpu variables
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 09:30:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200820074640.342269393@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20200820073031.886217423@infradead.org

Sven reported that commit a21ee6055c30 ("lockdep: Change
hardirq{s_enabled,_context} to per-cpu variables") caused trouble on
s390 because their this_cpu_*() primitives disable preemption which
then lands back tracing.

On the one hand, per-cpu ops should use preempt_*able_notrace() and
raw_local_irq_*(), on the other hand, we can trivialy use raw_cpu_*()
ops for this.

Fixes: a21ee6055c30 ("lockdep: Change hardirq{s_enabled,_context} to per-cpu variables")
Reported-by: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
 include/linux/irqflags.h |    6 +++---
 include/linux/lockdep.h  |   18 +++++++++++++-----
 kernel/locking/lockdep.c |    4 ++--
 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

--- a/include/linux/irqflags.h
+++ b/include/linux/irqflags.h
@@ -53,13 +53,13 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(int, hardirq_context);
   extern void trace_hardirqs_off_finish(void);
   extern void trace_hardirqs_on(void);
   extern void trace_hardirqs_off(void);
-# define lockdep_hardirq_context()	(this_cpu_read(hardirq_context))
+# define lockdep_hardirq_context()	(raw_cpu_read(hardirq_context))
 # define lockdep_softirq_context(p)	((p)->softirq_context)
 # define lockdep_hardirqs_enabled()	(this_cpu_read(hardirqs_enabled))
 # define lockdep_softirqs_enabled(p)	((p)->softirqs_enabled)
 # define lockdep_hardirq_enter()			\
 do {							\
-	if (this_cpu_inc_return(hardirq_context) == 1)	\
+	if (__this_cpu_inc_return(hardirq_context) == 1)\
 		current->hardirq_threaded = 0;		\
 } while (0)
 # define lockdep_hardirq_threaded()		\
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ do {						\
 } while (0)
 # define lockdep_hardirq_exit()			\
 do {						\
-	this_cpu_dec(hardirq_context);		\
+	__this_cpu_dec(hardirq_context);	\
 } while (0)
 # define lockdep_softirq_enter()		\
 do {						\
--- a/include/linux/lockdep.h
+++ b/include/linux/lockdep.h
@@ -535,19 +535,27 @@ do {									\
 DECLARE_PER_CPU(int, hardirqs_enabled);
 DECLARE_PER_CPU(int, hardirq_context);
 
+/*
+ * The below lockdep_assert_*() macros se raw_cpu_read() to access the above
+ * per-cpu variables. This is required because this_cpu_read() will potentially
+ * call into preempt/irq-disable and that obviously isn't right. This is also
+ * correct because when IRQs are enabled, it doesn't matter if we accidentally
+ * read the value from our previous CPU.
+ */
+
 #define lockdep_assert_irqs_enabled()					\
 do {									\
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(debug_locks && !this_cpu_read(hardirqs_enabled));	\
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(debug_locks && !raw_cpu_read(hardirqs_enabled));	\
 } while (0)
 
 #define lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled()					\
 do {									\
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(debug_locks && this_cpu_read(hardirqs_enabled));	\
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(debug_locks && raw_cpu_read(hardirqs_enabled));	\
 } while (0)
 
 #define lockdep_assert_in_irq()						\
 do {									\
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(debug_locks && !this_cpu_read(hardirq_context));	\
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(debug_locks && !raw_cpu_read(hardirq_context));	\
 } while (0)
 
 #define lockdep_assert_preemption_enabled()				\
@@ -555,7 +563,7 @@ do {									\
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT)	&&		\
 		     debug_locks			&&		\
 		     (preempt_count() != 0		||		\
-		      !this_cpu_read(hardirqs_enabled)));		\
+		      !raw_cpu_read(hardirqs_enabled)));		\
 } while (0)
 
 #define lockdep_assert_preemption_disabled()				\
@@ -563,7 +571,7 @@ do {									\
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT)	&&		\
 		     debug_locks			&&		\
 		     (preempt_count() == 0		&&		\
-		      this_cpu_read(hardirqs_enabled)));		\
+		      raw_cpu_read(hardirqs_enabled)));			\
 } while (0)
 
 #else
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -3756,7 +3756,7 @@ void noinstr lockdep_hardirqs_on(unsigne
 
 skip_checks:
 	/* we'll do an OFF -> ON transition: */
-	this_cpu_write(hardirqs_enabled, 1);
+	__this_cpu_write(hardirqs_enabled, 1);
 	trace->hardirq_enable_ip = ip;
 	trace->hardirq_enable_event = ++trace->irq_events;
 	debug_atomic_inc(hardirqs_on_events);
@@ -3795,7 +3795,7 @@ void noinstr lockdep_hardirqs_off(unsign
 		/*
 		 * We have done an ON -> OFF transition:
 		 */
-		this_cpu_write(hardirqs_enabled, 0);
+		__this_cpu_write(hardirqs_enabled, 0);
 		trace->hardirq_disable_ip = ip;
 		trace->hardirq_disable_event = ++trace->irq_events;
 		debug_atomic_inc(hardirqs_off_events);



  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-20  7:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-20  7:30 [PATCH 0/9] TRACE_IRQFLAGS wreckage Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-20  7:30 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2020-08-20 13:54   ` [PATCH 1/9] lockdep: Use raw_cpu_*() for per-cpu variables Steven Rostedt
2020-08-20  7:30 ` [PATCH 2/9] sched,idle,rcu: Push rcu_idle deeper into the idle path Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-20 13:58   ` Steven Rostedt
2020-08-20  7:30 ` [PATCH 3/9] cpuidle: Make CPUIDLE_FLAG_TLB_FLUSHED generic Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-20  7:30 ` [PATCH 4/9] cpuidle: Move trace_cpu_idle() into generic code Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-20  7:30 ` [PATCH 5/9] x86/entry: Remove unused THUNKs Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-20  7:30 ` [PATCH 6/9] locking/lockdep: Cleanup Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-20  7:30 ` [PATCH 7/9] nds32: Implement arch_irqs_disabled() Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-20  7:30 ` [PATCH 8/9] lockdep: Only trace IRQ edges Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-20  7:30 ` [PATCH 9/9] lockdep,trace: Expose tracepoints Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-20 14:36 ` [PATCH 0/9] TRACE_IRQFLAGS wreckage Steven Rostedt
2020-08-20 14:39   ` Steven Rostedt
2020-08-20 14:49   ` Marco Elver
2020-08-20 14:58   ` peterz
2020-08-20 16:53     ` Steven Rostedt
2020-08-20 17:20     ` Marco Elver
2020-08-20 19:59       ` Steven Rostedt
2020-08-21  6:37         ` Marco Elver
2020-08-21  6:54       ` peterz
2020-08-21  7:05         ` Marco Elver
2020-08-27  7:54       ` [tip: sched/urgent] sched: Use __always_inline on is_idle_task() tip-bot2 for Marco Elver

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200820074640.342269393@infradead.org \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.