All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	sandeen@sandeen.net, bfoster@redhat.com, david@fromorbit.com,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] xfs: define a new "needrepair" feature
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 18:12:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201209181242.GA30491@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201209181056.GK1943235@magnolia>

On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 10:10:56AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 06:04:00PM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Who is going to set this flag?  If the kernel ever sets it that is
> > a good way to totally brick systems if it happens on the root file
> > system.
> 
> So far the only user is xfs_db, when xfs_admin tells it to upgrade a v5
> filesystem and we want/need to force the fs through xfs_repair:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/160679383892.447856.12907477074923729733.stgit@magnolia/T/#mad4ee9c757051692f33a993a348f4e4e61ac098b
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/160679383892.447856.12907477074923729733.stgit@magnolia/T/#mb6ef416f9626d87610625e069f516945783a5c13
> 
> I don't think there's ever going to be a use case for the kernel setting
> the feature flag on a mounted fs -- if some error is fixable we should
> just have online repair fix it; or if it's truly catastrophic we don't
> want to write the disk at all.

Maybe the definition wants a comment to explain this?

  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-09 18:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-06 23:09 [PATCH v2 0/3] xfs: add the ability to flag a fs for repair Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-06 23:09 ` [PATCH 1/3] xfs: move kernel-specific superblock validation out of libxfs Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-06 23:47   ` Dave Chinner
2020-12-07 17:17   ` Brian Foster
2020-12-09 17:08   ` Eric Sandeen
2020-12-09 18:03   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-06 23:09 ` [PATCH 2/3] xfs: define a new "needrepair" feature Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-06 23:47   ` Dave Chinner
2020-12-09 17:15   ` Eric Sandeen
2020-12-09 18:04   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-09 18:10     ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-09 18:12       ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2020-12-06 23:09 ` [PATCH 3/3] xfs: enable the needsrepair feature Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-06 23:48   ` Dave Chinner
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-12-01  3:37 [PATCH 0/3] xfs: add the ability to flag a fs for repair Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-01  3:37 ` [PATCH 2/3] xfs: define a new "needrepair" feature Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-01 16:18   ` Brian Foster
2020-12-01 16:25     ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-01 17:09       ` Brian Foster
2020-12-04 20:07     ` Eric Sandeen
2020-12-04 21:36       ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201209181242.GA30491@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.