Re: [PATCH] docs: remove mention of ENABLE_MUST_CHECK

[Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>]

On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 06:58:15AM +0100, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> We removed ENABLE_MUST_CHECK in 196793946264 ("Compiler Attributes:
> remove CONFIG_ENABLE_MUST_CHECK"), so let's remove docs' mentions.
> 
> At the same time, fix the outdated text related to
> ENABLE_WARN_DEPRECATED that wasn't removed in 3337d5cfe5e08
> ("configs: get rid of obsolete CONFIG_ENABLE_WARN_DEPRECATED").
> 
> Finally, reflow the paragraph.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>

Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>

> ---
> A couple translations (it and zh) should consider updating this
> too, since they also have the mention -- Cc'ing their maintainers.
> 
>  Documentation/process/4.Coding.rst | 6 ++----
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/process/4.Coding.rst b/Documentation/process/4.Coding.rst
> index c27e59d2f702..0825dc496f22 100644
> --- a/Documentation/process/4.Coding.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/process/4.Coding.rst
> @@ -249,10 +249,8 @@ features; most of these are found in the "kernel hacking" submenu.  Several
>  of these options should be turned on for any kernel used for development or
>  testing purposes.  In particular, you should turn on:
>  
> - - ENABLE_MUST_CHECK and FRAME_WARN to get an
> -   extra set of warnings for problems like the use of deprecated interfaces
> -   or ignoring an important return value from a function.  The output
> -   generated by these warnings can be verbose, but one need not worry about
> + - FRAME_WARN to get warnings for stack frames larger than a given amount.
> +   The output generated can be verbose, but one need not worry about
>     warnings from other parts of the kernel.
>  
>   - DEBUG_OBJECTS will add code to track the lifetime of various objects
> -- 
> 2.29.2
>