From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7A1070 for ; Tue, 6 Jul 2021 19:45:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gandalf.local.home (cpe-66-24-58-225.stny.res.rr.com [66.24.58.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 15C4E61A36; Tue, 6 Jul 2021 19:45:21 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2021 15:45:19 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Laurent Pinchart Cc: Miguel Ojeda , Sasha Levin , Linus Walleij , Leon Romanovsky , ksummit@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [TECH TOPIC] Rust for Linux Message-ID: <20210706154519.6f378c34@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: ksummit@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 6 Jul 2021 21:38:09 +0300 Laurent Pinchart wrote: > I agree with you here, it's a honest way to look at it: adopting Rust as > a second language in the kernel isn't just a technical decision with > limited impact, but also a process decision that will create a > requirement for most kernel developers to learn Rust. Whether that > should and will happen is what we're debating, but regardless of the > outcome, it's important to phrase the question correctly, with a broad > view of the implications. I for one, welcome our new Rust overlords! -- Steve