From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25241C07E96 for ; Thu, 8 Jul 2021 16:43:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D205961874 for ; Thu, 8 Jul 2021 16:43:46 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D205961874 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=nongnu.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:38444 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m1X7q-000760-1K for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Thu, 08 Jul 2021 12:43:46 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34962) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m1WS4-0007rD-QP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Jul 2021 12:00:37 -0400 Received: from rev.ng ([5.9.113.41]:49689) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m1WS2-0004gj-Sr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Jul 2021 12:00:36 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rev.ng; s=dkim; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References: In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=g+1sdr5csp/wRyuW3RPosVH1E+2BTtc6owpGCru4Gfk=; b=AwUfP3fj8H+HcMkDQbRxmhbu2U pogt/TuOtO6v4n9ikOlej5j3aqAOoy31hlWCYKXVrOwwsU3LsViWNvkgubnsZJCvHeBsghwcdI61G HtOzn9jXwz3hk7miVX+c8Fh+trIIwZkfZ08h7CY2McHdYUUDQPdaMXxci5AcTGm0iF6M=; Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2021 18:00:14 +0200 To: "Daniel P. =?UTF-8?B?QmVycmFuZ8Op?=" Cc: bcain@quicinc.com, richard.henderson@linaro.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, babush@rev.ng, tsimpson@quicinc.com, nizzo@rev.ng, philmd@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 14/14] gitlab-ci: do not use qemu-project Docker registry Message-ID: <20210708180014.79df3e4d@orange> In-Reply-To: References: <20210619093713.1845446-1-ale.qemu@rev.ng> <20210619093713.1845446-15-ale.qemu@rev.ng> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=5.9.113.41; envelope-from=ale@rev.ng; helo=rev.ng X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Reply-to: Alessandro Di Federico From: Alessandro Di Federico via On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 15:37:21 +0100 Daniel P. Berrang=C3=A9 wrote: > We have either one or two images. If this is a new user fork, > we only have the $COMMON_TAG image in the main QEMU registry. > If this is a existing fork, we might have two images, one in > the main QEMU registry and one in the user's fork registry. > Both of the images are to be used as a cache source, with > the container tools figuring out which has matching image > layers, if any. > > This proposed change makes TAG and COMMON_TAG identical > which means we loose inheritance from the main QEMU > registry, which almost always has suitable cached content. I understand. This patch was aimed at pointing out a problem more than offering a proper solution. I'll try and take a look at how to do this right, but I think this outside the scope of this patchset (and my area of expertise). --=20 Alessandro Di Federico rev.ng