From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
Evgenii Stepanov <eugenis@google.com>,
Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>,
Tejas Belagod <Tejas.Belagod@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/5] arm64: mte: rename gcr_user_excl to mte_ctrl
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 12:01:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210714110111.GA31686@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210713234801.3858018-2-pcc@google.com>
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 04:47:57PM -0700, Peter Collingbourne wrote:
> We are going to use this field to store more data. To prepare for
> that, rename it and change the users to rely on the bit position of
> gcr_user_excl in mte_ctrl.
>
> Link: https://linux-review.googlesource.com/id/Ie1fd18e480100655f5d22137f5b22f4f3a9f9e2e
> Signed-off-by: Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h | 5 ++++-
> arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S | 4 ++--
> arch/arm64/kernel/mte.c | 14 ++++++++------
> 4 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
I acked this one already, but here it is again:
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Will
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-14 11:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-13 23:47 [PATCH v10 0/5] arm64: mte: allow async MTE to be upgraded to sync on a per-CPU basis Peter Collingbourne
2021-07-13 23:47 ` [PATCH v10 1/5] arm64: mte: rename gcr_user_excl to mte_ctrl Peter Collingbourne
2021-07-14 11:01 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2021-07-13 23:47 ` [PATCH v10 2/5] arm64: mte: change ASYNC and SYNC TCF settings into bitfields Peter Collingbourne
2021-07-14 11:02 ` Will Deacon
2021-07-13 23:47 ` [PATCH v10 3/5] arm64: move preemption disablement to prctl handlers Peter Collingbourne
2021-07-14 11:43 ` Will Deacon
2021-07-13 23:48 ` [PATCH v10 4/5] arm64: mte: introduce a per-CPU tag checking mode preference Peter Collingbourne
2021-07-14 11:45 ` Will Deacon
2021-07-13 23:48 ` [PATCH v10 5/5] Documentation: document the preferred tag checking mode feature Peter Collingbourne
2021-07-14 11:50 ` Will Deacon
2021-07-27 18:20 ` [PATCH v10 0/5] arm64: mte: allow async MTE to be upgraded to sync on a per-CPU basis Catalin Marinas
2021-07-27 20:54 ` Peter Collingbourne
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210714110111.GA31686@willie-the-truck \
--to=will@kernel.org \
--cc=Tejas.Belagod@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=eugenis@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=pcc@google.com \
--cc=szabolcs.nagy@arm.com \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.