All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Liam Beguin <liambeguin@gmail.com>
Cc: lars@metafoo.de, Michael.Hennerich@analog.com,
	charles-antoine.couret@essensium.com, Nuno.Sa@analog.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] iio: adc: ad7949: fix spi messages on non 14-bit controllers
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2021 18:23:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210717182326.487709af@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210713043425.3321230-3-liambeguin@gmail.com>

On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 00:34:23 -0400
Liam Beguin <liambeguin@gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Liam Beguin <lvb@xiphos.com>
> 
> This driver supports devices with 14-bit and 16-bit sample sizes.
> This is not always handled properly by spi controllers and can fail. To
> work around this limitation, pad samples to 16-bit and split the sample
> into two 8-bit messages in the event that only 8-bit messages are
> supported by the controller.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Liam Beguin <lvb@xiphos.com>

A small tidy up below that will make this even neater...

> ---
>  drivers/iio/adc/ad7949.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ad7949.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ad7949.c
> index 0b549b8bd7a9..65f78751225b 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ad7949.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ad7949.c
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
>  #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
>  #include <linux/spi/spi.h>
>  #include <linux/bitfield.h>
> +#include <asm/unaligned.h>
>  
>  #define AD7949_MASK_TOTAL		GENMASK(13, 0)
>  
> @@ -67,6 +68,7 @@ static const struct ad7949_adc_spec ad7949_adc_spec[] = {
>   * @indio_dev: reference to iio structure
>   * @spi: reference to spi structure
>   * @resolution: resolution of the chip
> + * @bits_per_word: number of bits per SPI word
>   * @cfg: copy of the configuration register
>   * @current_channel: current channel in use
>   * @buffer: buffer to send / receive data to / from device
> @@ -77,6 +79,7 @@ struct ad7949_adc_chip {
>  	struct iio_dev *indio_dev;
>  	struct spi_device *spi;
>  	u8 resolution;
> +	u8 bits_per_word;
>  	u16 cfg;
>  	unsigned int current_channel;
>  	u16 buffer ____cacheline_aligned;
> @@ -86,19 +89,37 @@ static int ad7949_spi_write_cfg(struct ad7949_adc_chip *ad7949_adc, u16 val,
>  				u16 mask)
>  {
>  	int ret;
> -	int bits_per_word = ad7949_adc->resolution;
> -	int shift = bits_per_word - AD7949_CFG_REG_SIZE_BITS;
> +	u8 buf8[2];
>  	struct spi_message msg;
>  	struct spi_transfer tx[] = {
>  		{
>  			.tx_buf = &ad7949_adc->buffer,
>  			.len = 2,
> -			.bits_per_word = bits_per_word,
> +			.bits_per_word = ad7949_adc->bits_per_word,
>  		},
>  	};
>  
> +	ad7949_adc->buffer = 0;
>  	ad7949_adc->cfg = (val & mask) | (ad7949_adc->cfg & ~mask);
> -	ad7949_adc->buffer = ad7949_adc->cfg << shift;
> +
> +	switch (ad7949_adc->bits_per_word) {
> +	case 16:
> +		ad7949_adc->buffer = ad7949_adc->cfg << 2;
> +		break;
> +	case 14:
> +		ad7949_adc->buffer = ad7949_adc->cfg;
> +		break;
> +	case 8:
> +		/* Pack 14-bit value into 2 bytes, MSB first */
> +		buf8[0] = FIELD_GET(GENMASK(13, 6), ad7949_adc->cfg);
> +		buf8[1] = FIELD_GET(GENMASK(5, 0), ad7949_adc->cfg) << 2;
> +		memcpy(&ad7949_adc->buffer, buf8, 2);

Can probably tidy this up given the form - all we actually need to do is ensure the
value ends up big endian.

		/* Type is only big endian for this case as must be done as two transfers */
		ad7949_adc->buffer = (u16)cpu_to_be16(ad7959_adc->cfg << 2);

> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		dev_err(&ad7949_adc->indio_dev->dev, "unsupported BPW\n");
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
>  	spi_message_init_with_transfers(&msg, tx, 1);
>  	ret = spi_sync(ad7949_adc->spi, &msg);
>  
> @@ -115,14 +136,13 @@ static int ad7949_spi_read_channel(struct ad7949_adc_chip *ad7949_adc, int *val,
>  {
>  	int ret;
>  	int i;
> -	int bits_per_word = ad7949_adc->resolution;
> -	int mask = GENMASK(ad7949_adc->resolution - 1, 0);
> +	u8 buf8[2];

As below, not needed that I can see.

>  	struct spi_message msg;
>  	struct spi_transfer tx[] = {
>  		{
>  			.rx_buf = &ad7949_adc->buffer,
>  			.len = 2,
> -			.bits_per_word = bits_per_word,
> +			.bits_per_word = ad7949_adc->bits_per_word,
>  		},
>  	};
>  
> @@ -157,7 +177,26 @@ static int ad7949_spi_read_channel(struct ad7949_adc_chip *ad7949_adc, int *val,
>  
>  	ad7949_adc->current_channel = channel;
>  
> -	*val = ad7949_adc->buffer & mask;
> +	switch (ad7949_adc->bits_per_word) {
> +	case 16:
> +		*val = ad7949_adc->buffer;
> +		/* Shift-out padding bits */
> +		*val >>= 16 - ad7949_adc->resolution;
> +		break;
> +	case 14:
> +		*val = ad7949_adc->buffer & GENMASK(13, 0);
> +		break;
> +	case 8:
> +		memcpy(buf8, &ad7949_adc->buffer, 2);
> +		/* Convert byte array to u16, MSB first */
> +		*val = get_unaligned_be16(buf8);

Why the local copy first?

		*val = get_unaligned_be16(ad7949_adc->buffer);

should get what you want, it doesn't care about the type.
Even better, that buffer is aligned, so we can do
be16_to_cpu() safely I think...

> +		/* Shift-out padding bits */
> +		*val >>= 16 - ad7949_adc->resolution;
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		dev_err(&ad7949_adc->indio_dev->dev, "unsupported BPW\n");
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -265,6 +304,7 @@ static int ad7949_spi_init(struct ad7949_adc_chip *ad7949_adc)
>  
>  static int ad7949_spi_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
>  {
> +	u32 spi_ctrl_mask = spi->controller->bits_per_word_mask;
>  	struct device *dev = &spi->dev;
>  	const struct ad7949_adc_spec *spec;
>  	struct ad7949_adc_chip *ad7949_adc;
> @@ -291,6 +331,18 @@ static int ad7949_spi_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
>  	indio_dev->num_channels = spec->num_channels;
>  	ad7949_adc->resolution = spec->resolution;
>  
> +	/* Set SPI bits per word */
> +	if (spi_ctrl_mask & SPI_BPW_MASK(ad7949_adc->resolution)) {
> +		ad7949_adc->bits_per_word = ad7949_adc->resolution;
> +	} else if (spi_ctrl_mask == SPI_BPW_MASK(16)) {
> +		ad7949_adc->bits_per_word = 16;
> +	} else if (spi_ctrl_mask == SPI_BPW_MASK(8)) {
> +		ad7949_adc->bits_per_word = 8;
> +	} else {
> +		dev_err(dev, "unable to find common BPW with spi controller\n");
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
>  	ad7949_adc->vref = devm_regulator_get(dev, "vref");
>  	if (IS_ERR(ad7949_adc->vref)) {
>  		dev_err(dev, "fail to request regulator\n");


  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-17 17:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-13  4:34 [PATCH v3 0/4] AD7949 Fixes Liam Beguin
2021-07-13  4:34 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] iio: adc: ad7949: define and use bitfield names Liam Beguin
2021-07-17 17:10   ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-07-13  4:34 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] iio: adc: ad7949: fix spi messages on non 14-bit controllers Liam Beguin
2021-07-17 17:23   ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2021-07-27 22:04     ` Liam Beguin
2021-07-13  4:34 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] iio: adc: ad7949: add support for internal vref Liam Beguin
2021-07-17 17:34   ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-07-27 22:08     ` Liam Beguin
2021-07-13  4:34 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] dt-bindings: iio: adc: ad7949: add per channel reference Liam Beguin
2021-07-15 16:33   ` Rob Herring

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210717182326.487709af@jic23-huawei \
    --to=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
    --cc=Nuno.Sa@analog.com \
    --cc=charles-antoine.couret@essensium.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=liambeguin@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.