Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] monitor: Add HMP and QMP interfaces

[Yang Zhong <yang.zhong@intel.com>]

On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 02:39:04PM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 9/10/21 12:22 PM, Yang Zhong wrote:
> > The QMP and HMP interfaces can be used by monitor or QMP tools to retrieve
> > the SGX information from VM side when SGX is enabled on Intel platform.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Yang Zhong <yang.zhong@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  hmp-commands-info.hx         | 15 +++++++++++++
> >  hw/i386/sgx.c                | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  include/hw/i386/sgx.h        | 11 +++++++++
> >  include/monitor/hmp-target.h |  1 +
> >  qapi/misc-target.json        | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  target/i386/monitor.c        | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  tests/qtest/qmp-cmd-test.c   |  1 +
> >  7 files changed, 136 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 include/hw/i386/sgx.h
> 
> > diff --git a/qapi/misc-target.json b/qapi/misc-target.json
> > index 3b05ad3dbf..e2a347cc23 100644
> > --- a/qapi/misc-target.json
> > +++ b/qapi/misc-target.json
> > @@ -333,3 +333,46 @@
> >  { 'command': 'query-sev-attestation-report', 'data': { 'mnonce': 'str' },
> >    'returns': 'SevAttestationReport',
> >    'if': 'TARGET_I386' }
> > +
> > +##
> > +# @SGXInfo:
> > +#
> > +# Information about intel Safe Guard eXtension (SGX) support
> > +#
> > +# @sgx: true if SGX is supported
> > +#
> > +# @sgx1: true if SGX1 is supported
> > +#
> > +# @sgx2: true if SGX2 is supported
> > +#
> > +# @flc: true if FLC is supported
> > +#
> > +# @section-size: The EPC section size for guest
> > +#
> > +# Since: 6.2
> > +##
> > +{ 'struct': 'SGXInfo',
> > +  'data': { 'sgx': 'bool',
> > +            'sgx1': 'bool',
> > +            'sgx2': 'bool',
> > +            'flc': 'bool',
> > +            'section-size': 'uint64'},
> > +   'if': 'TARGET_I386' }
> 
> Is it possible to restrict it to KVM? Maybe:
> 
>      'if': { 'all': ['TARGET_I386', 'CONFIG_KVM'] } },
> 
> ? (I'm not sure).

  Philippe, i tried this definition, which is feasible.
  This seems more accurate for sgx in the kvm of i386 platform. thanks!

  Yang