All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kraxel@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pci: Skip power-off reset when pending unplug
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 18:03:56 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211220174502-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <164002480875.2328622.7843917444941101286.stgit@omen>

On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 11:26:59AM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> The below referenced commit introduced a change where devices under a
> root port slot are reset in response to removing power to the slot.
> This improves emulation relative to bare metal when the slot is powered
> off, but introduces an unnecessary step when devices under that slot
> are slated for removal.
> 
> In the case of an assigned device, there are mandatory delays
> associated with many device reset mechanisms which can stall the hot
> unplug operation.  Also, in cases where the unplug request is triggered
> via a release operation of the host driver, internal device locking in
> the host kernel may result in a failure of the device reset mechanism,
> which generates unnecessary log warnings.
> 
> Skip the reset for devices that are slated for unplug.
> 
> Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
> Fixes: d5daff7d3126 ("pcie: implement slot power control for pcie root ports")
> Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>

I am not sure this is safe. IIUC pending_deleted_event
is normally set after host admin requested device removal,
while the reset could be triggered by guest for its own reasons
such as suspend or driver reload.

Looking at this some more, I am not sure I understand the
issue completely.
We have:

    if ((sltsta & PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_PDS) && (val & PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PCC) &&
        (val & PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PIC_OFF) == PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PIC_OFF &&
        (!(old_slt_ctl & PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PCC) ||
        (old_slt_ctl & PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PIC_OFF) != PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PIC_OFF)) {
        pcie_cap_slot_do_unplug(dev);
    }
    pcie_cap_update_power(dev);

so device unplug triggers first, reset follows and by that time
there should be no devices under the bus, if there are then
it's because guest did not clear the power indicator.


So I am not sure how to fix the assignment issues as I'm not sure how do
they trigger, but here is a wild idea: maybe it should support an API
for starting reset asynchronously, then if the following access is
trying to reset again that second reset can just be skipped, while any
other access will stall.





> ---
>  hw/pci/pci.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/pci/pci.c b/hw/pci/pci.c
> index e5993c1ef52b..f594da410797 100644
> --- a/hw/pci/pci.c
> +++ b/hw/pci/pci.c
> @@ -2869,7 +2869,7 @@ void pci_set_power(PCIDevice *d, bool state)
>      memory_region_set_enabled(&d->bus_master_enable_region,
>                                (pci_get_word(d->config + PCI_COMMAND)
>                                 & PCI_COMMAND_MASTER) && d->has_power);
> -    if (!d->has_power) {
> +    if (!d->has_power && !d->qdev.pending_deleted_event) {
>          pci_device_reset(d);
>      }
>  }
> 



  reply	other threads:[~2021-12-20 23:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-20 18:26 [PATCH] pci: Skip power-off reset when pending unplug Alex Williamson
2021-12-20 23:03 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2021-12-21 16:36   ` Alex Williamson
2021-12-21 23:40     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-12-22 19:08       ` Alex Williamson
2021-12-22 20:48         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-12-22 23:10           ` Alex Williamson
2021-12-23 13:33             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-01-05 19:17               ` Alex Williamson
2021-12-23  7:11         ` Gerd Hoffmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211220174502-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.