From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CEFEC433EF for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2022 04:47:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=irLIKeeihirYn63JeCZErt876T+TzYgoovSLao8QWec=; b=jVg/HsoFm9gdZO SpUmAdyuxk5mIgEodiuaTPpPmG1UOPmthxCt6L1sPrBpxXqF3HfMH+6wldIabmEkRQKJWs9cL6Zez wLI4Ybzi68O+s++/mtmmqpYRgXEuQtjfXog05BzPen6O9jk6toD97gkFWQL85FMbsR+unaGBLeMz2 YN5zOj5xqrXZLi4xAuf6tgR4toqITozAvVyLXtixU3js4ucAysLB5J3FDYH9lzZ8miBRhp/mHWg/9 sFwT3rUGmUP5UsrEYNnPYXQbsF21bHNajZ7NHepOO+E77WbWVthb2c89gLmWQhORvwEdcXI+IpiW/ 8NrPJWJzxHIMfwe8Uw8Q==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1n9gOu-000FIl-97; Tue, 18 Jan 2022 04:47:20 +0000 Received: from mail-wm1-x331.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::331]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1n9gOr-000FHm-Pd for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2022 04:47:19 +0000 Received: by mail-wm1-x331.google.com with SMTP id i187-20020a1c3bc4000000b0034d2ed1be2aso1447600wma.1 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2022 20:47:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ventanamicro.com; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=vbQZn4Jtn1Jk8a2/mzv3m3CnTM5iuSLJBXe/KYGd1R8=; b=QOZXRlND6eY5fQOGmwZBPOrtNWgku9Hstqcq29bp4x+mKq/hu5x6Z7ubXH8/+439Iy Zob7cD2fJoC6Otk4BiGbnWgN4dkWWeuR2wSgWgI8niwTdtdtAWr+eUY/vJ7lqSnXLsZ0 PZZMcfQbRqPLF0laIf0OJ1Q58rd3WumlZBBzqdQQKtOe2rors0acZpKp/5O1K11AduAO 8ZYlMFAJ2hYETAKOeP/x/xbIIcTX15hco0a09I3y1wK2HKTku+0e4p5aF5UqiHtPTFAU ORTVWEbo9I+0xkr7aVkm8EghaRjnPNhnr4nc3WPXKxbu6GA5tLns/2EbwyenBDhjyxJ4 khnA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=vbQZn4Jtn1Jk8a2/mzv3m3CnTM5iuSLJBXe/KYGd1R8=; b=f0ULNVDrXDalHZDFxD8tJSWVbnYs9SvxvOXaL5pYrVstDCCAUAadMCOEco2clGd3ka NSCM7h0oO7bmNXfAyR/j1gTn0zyy6jlAChyOd3XIhzrLCPpPEmAlrp5J1zEhQNAlPMYy kPrrngj3WZC0+SIMYXV48MjdCxxbpT4gHgfke1SoW3k01ywuncc54rFLaoY8t9g+oAhX GagQnNHXFCeEDVtDVXaD3PFu1c29pqdtmN+sZxYQf4WMscvb9872f1omXrLrhSt6aEaw VPhnQQWivC+NgpeI82gKR7clir23ebMMO6A/r2/MQlz/qoJHLcI/rc15ZQQpTYV5vhlH d8Yw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531YolpMy8equmtkNUXkcBMR8/MG6zivzzf3TSUbTYGRxHYbdwSy khWqo9ROSgGQBtLUC0AKPx78Lw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJziN2goAsnQIAU4ZCXYn2kOvWFxUiJL5qGU+UCb7RMCIq/uJFrgGHpvNY99OgVMyW9jlnkLFA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:2216:: with SMTP id z22mr1035662wml.119.1642481235411; Mon, 17 Jan 2022 20:47:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from sunil-ThinkPad-T490 ([49.206.3.187]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g12sm15350962wrm.109.2022.01.17.20.47.09 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 17 Jan 2022 20:47:15 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2022 10:17:04 +0530 From: Sunil V L To: Ard Biesheuvel Cc: Heinrich Schuchardt , Atish Patra , Anup Patel , Abner Chang , Heinrich Schuchardt , Jessica Clarke , Palmer Dabbelt , sunil.vl@gmail.com, linux-riscv Subject: Re: Question regarding "boot-hartid" DT node Message-ID: <20220118044704.GA3734@sunil-ThinkPad-T490> References: <7416157e-50d1-3664-7df0-2a45e29cd8c1@canonical.com> <20220113094448.GA15466@sunil-ThinkPad-T490> <20220113095913.GA17107@sunil-ThinkPad-T490> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220117_204717_869894_9A78DCAB X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 19.59 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 11:01:10AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 at 10:59, Sunil V L wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 10:50:11AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > > > Hi Ard, > > > > Here is the draft EFI_RISCV_BOOT_PROTOCOL specification. > > > > https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-uefi/releases/download/0.3/EFI_RISCV_PROTOCOL-spec.pdf > > > > > > > > If you are fine with this, we can freeze this spec. Thanks a lot for > > > > your help on this. > > > > > > Please don't use the EFI_ prefix, it is reserved for protocols that > > > are defined in the UEFI or PI specifications. > > > > Oh OK. I didn't know that. TCG2 protocols also start with EFI prefix. Is > > that a mistake? > > > > Yes. > > > Would "RISCV_EFI_BOOT_PROTOCOL" be better? > > > > Yes, or RISCV_BOOT_PROTOCOL. The EFI is kind of redundant since we are > dealing with a EFI protocol. Thanks a lot!, Ard. While I agree EFI is kind of redundant, I still prefer to keep it. Since RISC-V supports both EFI and non-EFI systems, having EFI clearly indicates this is for EFI systems. Thanks Sunil > > > Thanks > > Sunil > > > > > > Other than that, this looks fine to me. > > > > > > -- > > > Ard. _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv