All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
To: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>, bhelgaas@google.com
Cc: "Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] PCI: keystone: Add quirk to mark AM654 RC BAR flag as IORESOURCE_UNSET
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 11:53:44 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220208115344.GB6233@lpieralisi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a07040ce-e043-22ac-2ee5-47a3bfdedd3b@ti.com>

On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 08:38:46PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> Hi Lorenzo,
> 
> On 11/01/22 11:53 am, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> > Hi Lorenzo,
> > 
> > On 04/01/22 9:27 pm, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> >> On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 02:01:18PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> >>> AM654 RootComplex has a hard coded 64 bit BAR of size 1MB and also has
> >>> both MSI and MSI-X capability in it's config space. If PCIEPORTBUS is
> >>> enabled, it tries to configure MSI-X and msix_mask_all() adds about 10
> >>> Second boot up delay when it tries to write to undefined location.
> >>>
> >>> Add quirk to mark AM654 RC BAR flag as IORESOURCE_UNSET so that
> >>> msix_map_region() returns NULL for Root Complex and avoid un-desirable
> >>> writes to MSI-X table.
> >>
> >> I don't think this is the right fix (it is not even a fix, just a
> >> plaster to workaround an issue).
> >>
> >> What do you mean by "writing to an undefined location" ?
> >>
> >> What does "a hard coded BAR" mean ?
> >>
> >> What happens if we _rightly_ write into it (ie to size it) ?
> > 
> > There are two parts w.r.t setting the BAR; one is during the configuration and
> > the other is during the enumeration.
> > i) During the configuration, the size of the BAR is configured and the inbound
> > ATU is configured to map the BAR to a physical memory.
> > ii) During the enumeration, the size of the BAR is obtained and an address is
> > allocated and programmed in the BAR.
> > 
> > In the case of RC, for (i) above, the BAR size is configured as '0'
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c#n556
> > and the inbound ATU is not programmed at all.
> > 
> > However, in the case of AM654, the HW configures BAR0 for a fixed size of 1MB
> > (irrespective of what SW programmed in [i]). While this was done more for a
> > endpoint usecase, since the same IP is configured for both RC mode and EP mode,
> > the fixed BAR size is seen with RC mode as well. AM654 also has MSI-X capability
> > for RC mode (the IP should have been ideally configured to have MSI-X capability
> > for EP mode). This results in PCIEPORTBUS doing some undesired access in
> > msix_mask_all().
> > 
> > Here I configure IORESOURCE_UNSET so that memory is not allocated for RC BAR.
> 
> Do you need further clarifications on this?

There are two things here:

1) As Rob mentioned, you can write it as a quirk applying only to the
   bridge _only_
2) What you want is that the BAR should not be visible to the OS since
   it is not an actual resource. What I am questioning is whether your
   way of doing that complies with how this is done in the kernel for
   other devices/bridges. I need Bjorn's input on this since he knows
   better (especially wrt IORESOURCE_UNSET usage). I don't want to add
   any other IORESOURCE_UNSET usage that deviates from what's expected
   from it

Lorenzo

> > 
> >>
> >> Lorenzo
> >>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-keystone.c | 8 +++++++-
> >>>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-keystone.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-keystone.c
> >>> index 52d20fe17ee9..73e6626a0d8f 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-keystone.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-keystone.c
> >>> @@ -557,8 +557,14 @@ static void ks_pcie_quirk(struct pci_dev *dev)
> >>>  		{ 0, },
> >>>  	};
> >>>  
> >>> -	if (pci_is_root_bus(bus))
> >>> +	if (pci_is_root_bus(bus)) {
> >>>  		bridge = dev;
> >>> +		if (pci_match_id(am6_pci_devids, bridge)) {
> >>> +			struct resource *r = &dev->resource[0];
> >>> +
> >>> +			r->flags |= IORESOURCE_UNSET;
> >>> +		}
> >>> +	}
> >>>  
> >>>  	/* look for the host bridge */
> >>>  	while (!pci_is_root_bus(bus)) {
> >>> -- 
> >>> 2.17.1
> >>>

  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-08 11:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-26  8:31 [PATCH v2 0/5] PCI: Keystone: Misc fixes for TI's AM65x PCIe Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2021-11-26  8:31 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] dt-bindings: PCI: ti,am65: Fix "ti,syscon-pcie-id"/"ti,syscon-pcie-mode" to take argument Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2021-11-27 23:13   ` Rob Herring
2021-11-29  4:03     ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2021-12-01 22:55   ` Rob Herring
2021-11-26  8:31 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] PCI: keystone: Use phandle argument from "ti,syscon-pcie-id"/"ti,syscon-pcie-mode" Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2021-11-26  8:31 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] PCI: keystone: Add workaround for Errata #i2037 (AM65x SR 1.0) Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2021-11-26  8:31 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] PCI: keystone: Add quirk to mark AM654 RC BAR flag as IORESOURCE_UNSET Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2022-01-04 15:57   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2022-01-11  6:23     ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2022-02-04 15:08       ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2022-02-08 11:53         ` Lorenzo Pieralisi [this message]
2022-02-08 16:20           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-01-04 18:25   ` Rob Herring
2021-11-26  8:31 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] PCI: keystone: Set DMA mask and coherent DMA mask Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2022-02-28 11:38   ` Christian Gmeiner
2022-01-04  9:02 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] PCI: Keystone: Misc fixes for TI's AM65x PCIe Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2022-01-07 10:56 ` (subset) " Lorenzo Pieralisi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220208115344.GB6233@lpieralisi \
    --to=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kishon@ti.com \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.