All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
	david@fromorbit.com, djwong@kernel.org, jlayton@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] vfs: strip file's S_ISGID mode on vfs instead of on underlying filesystem
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 14:45:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220414124552.4uf3hpopqa4xlwrd@wittgenstein> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1649923039-2273-2-git-send-email-xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com>

On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 03:57:18PM +0800, Yang Xu wrote:
> Currently, vfs only passes mode argument to filesystem, then use inode_init_owner()
> to strip S_ISGID. Some filesystem(ie ext4/btrfs) will call inode_init_owner
> firstly, then posxi acl setup, but xfs uses the contrary order. It will affect
> S_ISGID clear especially we filter S_IXGRP by umask or acl.
> 
> Regardless of which filesystem is in use, failure to strip the SGID correctly is
> considered a security failure that needs to be fixed. The current VFS infrastructure
> requires the filesystem to do everything right and not step on any landmines to
> strip the SGID bit, when in fact it can easily be done at the VFS and the filesystems
> then don't even need to be aware that the SGID needs to be (or has been stripped) by
> the operation the user asked to be done.
> 
> Vfs has all the info it needs - it doesn't need the filesystems to do everything
> correctly with the mode and ensuring that they order things like posix acl setup
> functions correctly with inode_init_owner() to strip the SGID bit.
> 
> Just strip the SGID bit at the VFS, and then the filesystems can't get it wrong.
> 
> Also, the inode_sgid_strip() api should be used before IS_POSIXACL() because
> this api may change mode.
> 
> Only the following places use inode_init_owner
> "hugetlbfs/inode.c:846:          inode_init_owner(&init_user_ns, inode, dir, mode);
>  nilfs2/inode.c:354:     inode_init_owner(&init_user_ns, inode, dir, mode);
>  zonefs/super.c:1289:    inode_init_owner(&init_user_ns, inode, parent, S_IFDIR | 0555);
>  reiserfs/namei.c:619:   inode_init_owner(&init_user_ns, inode, dir, mode);
>  jfs/jfs_inode.c:67:     inode_init_owner(&init_user_ns, inode, parent, mode);
>  f2fs/namei.c:50:        inode_init_owner(mnt_userns, inode, dir, mode);
>  ext2/ialloc.c:549:              inode_init_owner(&init_user_ns, inode, dir, mode);
>  overlayfs/dir.c:643:    inode_init_owner(&init_user_ns, inode, dentry->d_parent->d_inode, mode);
>  ufs/ialloc.c:292:       inode_init_owner(&init_user_ns, inode, dir, mode);
>  ntfs3/inode.c:1283:     inode_init_owner(mnt_userns, inode, dir, mode);
>  ramfs/inode.c:64:               inode_init_owner(&init_user_ns, inode, dir, mode);
>  9p/vfs_inode.c:263:     inode_init_owner(&init_user_ns, inode, NULL, mode);
>  btrfs/tests/btrfs-tests.c:65:   inode_init_owner(&init_user_ns, inode, NULL, S_IFREG);
>  btrfs/inode.c:6215:     inode_init_owner(mnt_userns, inode, dir, mode);
>  sysv/ialloc.c:166:      inode_init_owner(&init_user_ns, inode, dir, mode);
>  omfs/inode.c:51:        inode_init_owner(&init_user_ns, inode, NULL, mode);
>  ubifs/dir.c:97: inode_init_owner(&init_user_ns, inode, dir, mode);
>  udf/ialloc.c:108:       inode_init_owner(&init_user_ns, inode, dir, mode);
>  ext4/ialloc.c:979:              inode_init_owner(mnt_userns, inode, dir, mode);
>  hfsplus/inode.c:393:    inode_init_owner(&init_user_ns, inode, dir, mode);
>  xfs/xfs_inode.c:840:            inode_init_owner(mnt_userns, inode, dir, mode);
>  ocfs2/dlmfs/dlmfs.c:331:                inode_init_owner(&init_user_ns, inode, NULL, mode);
>  ocfs2/dlmfs/dlmfs.c:354:        inode_init_owner(&init_user_ns, inode, parent, mode);
>  ocfs2/namei.c:200:      inode_init_owner(&init_user_ns, inode, dir, mode);
>  minix/bitmap.c:255:     inode_init_owner(&init_user_ns, inode, dir, mode);
>  bfs/dir.c:99:   inode_init_owner(&init_user_ns, inode, dir, mode);
> "

For completeness sake, there's also spufs which doesn't really go
through the regular VFS callpath because it has separate system calls
like:

SYSCALL_DEFINE4(spu_create, const char __user *, name, unsigned int, flags,
	umode_t, mode, int, neighbor_fd)

but looking through the code it only allows the creation of directories and only
allows bits in 0777.

> 
> They are used in filesystem init new inode function and these init inode functions are used
> by following operations:
> mkdir
> symlink
> mknod
> create
> tmpfile
> rename
> 
> We don't care about mkdir because we don't strip SGID bit for directory except fs.xfs.irix_sgid_inherit.
> symlink and rename only use valid mode that doesn't have SGID bit.
> 
> We have added inode_sgid_strip api for the remaining operations.
> 
> In addition to the above six operations, two filesystems has a little difference
> 1) btrfs has btrfs_create_subvol_root to create new inode but used non SGID bit mode and can ignore
> 2) ocfs2 reflink function should add inode_sgid_strip api manually because we don't add it in vfs
> 
> Last but not least, this patch also changed grpid behaviour for ext4/xfs because the mode passed to
> them may been changed by inode_sgid_strip.

I think the patch itself is useful as it would move a security sensitive
operation that is currently burried in individual filesystems into the
vfs layer. But it has a decent regression potential since it might trip
filesystems that have so far relied on getting the S_ISGID bit with a
mode argument. The example being network filesystems that Jeff brought
up earlier. So this needs a lot of testing and long exposure in -next
for at least one full kernel cycle imho.

> 
> Suggested-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  fs/inode.c       | 4 ----
>  fs/namei.c       | 5 ++++-
>  fs/ocfs2/namei.c | 1 +
>  3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c
> index d63264998855..b08bdd73e116 100644
> --- a/fs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/inode.c
> @@ -2246,10 +2246,6 @@ void inode_init_owner(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, struct inode *inode,
>  		/* Directories are special, and always inherit S_ISGID */
>  		if (S_ISDIR(mode))
>  			mode |= S_ISGID;
> -		else if ((mode & (S_ISGID | S_IXGRP)) == (S_ISGID | S_IXGRP) &&
> -			 !in_group_p(i_gid_into_mnt(mnt_userns, dir)) &&
> -			 !capable_wrt_inode_uidgid(mnt_userns, dir, CAP_FSETID))
> -			mode &= ~S_ISGID;
>  	} else
>  		inode_fsgid_set(inode, mnt_userns);
>  	inode->i_mode = mode;
> diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c
> index 3f1829b3ab5b..e03f7defdd30 100644
> --- a/fs/namei.c
> +++ b/fs/namei.c
> @@ -3287,6 +3287,7 @@ static struct dentry *lookup_open(struct nameidata *nd, struct file *file,
>  	if (open_flag & O_CREAT) {
>  		if (open_flag & O_EXCL)
>  			open_flag &= ~O_TRUNC;
> +		inode_sgid_strip(mnt_userns, dir->d_inode, &mode);
>  		if (!IS_POSIXACL(dir->d_inode))
>  			mode &= ~current_umask();
>  		if (likely(got_write))
> @@ -3521,6 +3522,7 @@ struct dentry *vfs_tmpfile(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns,
>  	child = d_alloc(dentry, &slash_name);
>  	if (unlikely(!child))
>  		goto out_err;
> +	inode_sgid_strip(mnt_userns, dir, &mode);

Hm, an additional question: how is umask stripping currently handled in
vfs_tmpfile()? I don't see it anywhere. That seems like a bug?

>  	error = dir->i_op->tmpfile(mnt_userns, dir, child, mode);
>  	if (error)
>  		goto out_err;
> @@ -3850,13 +3852,14 @@ static int do_mknodat(int dfd, struct filename *name, umode_t mode,
>  	if (IS_ERR(dentry))
>  		goto out1;
>  
> +	mnt_userns = mnt_user_ns(path.mnt);
> +	inode_sgid_strip(mnt_userns, path.dentry->d_inode, &mode);
>  	if (!IS_POSIXACL(path.dentry->d_inode))
>  		mode &= ~current_umask();

It would be worth to add another helper prepare_mode() that calls
inode_sgid_strip() and does the umask stripping as well and then call it
in all these places. You should even call it in do_mkdirat() since
inode_sgid_strip() will skip directories anyway. This will enforce the
same ordering for all relevant operations and it will make the code more
uniform and easier to understand.

>  	error = security_path_mknod(&path, dentry, mode, dev);
>  	if (error)
>  		goto out2;
>  
> -	mnt_userns = mnt_user_ns(path.mnt);
>  	switch (mode & S_IFMT) {
>  		case 0: case S_IFREG:
>  			error = vfs_create(mnt_userns, path.dentry->d_inode,
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/namei.c b/fs/ocfs2/namei.c
> index c75fd54b9185..f1d626697302 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/namei.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/namei.c
> @@ -197,6 +197,7 @@ static struct inode *ocfs2_get_init_inode(struct inode *dir, umode_t mode)
>  	 * callers. */
>  	if (S_ISDIR(mode))
>  		set_nlink(inode, 2);
> +	inode_sgid_strip(&init_user_ns, dir, &mode);
>  	inode_init_owner(&init_user_ns, inode, dir, mode);
>  	status = dquot_initialize(inode);
>  	if (status)
> -- 
> 2.27.0
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-14 12:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-14  7:57 [PATCH v2 1/3] vfs: Add inode_sgid_strip() api Yang Xu
2022-04-14  7:57 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] vfs: strip file's S_ISGID mode on vfs instead of on underlying filesystem Yang Xu
2022-04-14 12:45   ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2022-04-15  3:14     ` xuyang2018.jy
2022-04-15  9:06       ` xuyang2018.jy
2022-04-15 14:03         ` Christian Brauner
2022-04-15 14:02       ` Christian Brauner
2022-04-19  5:44         ` xuyang2018.jy
2022-04-14  7:57 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] ceph: Remove S_ISGID clear code in ceph_finish_async_create Yang Xu
2022-04-14 12:02 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] vfs: Add inode_sgid_strip() api Christian Brauner
2022-04-15  1:39   ` xuyang2018.jy
2022-04-14 15:57 ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Darrick J. Wong via Ocfs2-devel
2022-04-14 15:57   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-04-15  1:18   ` xuyang2018.jy
2022-04-15  1:40     ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-04-15  1:40       ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Darrick J. Wong via Ocfs2-devel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220414124552.4uf3hpopqa4xlwrd@wittgenstein \
    --to=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.