All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
To: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>, <kernel-team@fb.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 01/12] bpf: Add btf enum64 support
Date: Sun, 1 May 2022 12:00:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220501190007.2576808-1-yhs@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220501190002.2576452-1-yhs@fb.com>

Currently, BTF only supports upto 32bit enum value with BTF_KIND_ENUM.
But in kernel, some enum indeed has 64bit values, e.g.,
in uapi bpf.h, we have
  enum {
        BPF_F_INDEX_MASK                = 0xffffffffULL,
        BPF_F_CURRENT_CPU               = BPF_F_INDEX_MASK,
        BPF_F_CTXLEN_MASK               = (0xfffffULL << 32),
  };
In this case, BTF_KIND_ENUM will encode the value of BPF_F_CTXLEN_MASK
as 0, which certainly is incorrect.

This patch added a new btf kind, BTF_KIND_ENUM64, which permits
64bit value to cover the above use case. The BTF_KIND_ENUM64 has
the following three bytes followed by the common type:
  struct bpf_enum64 {
    __u32 nume_off;
    __u32 hi32;
    __u32 lo32;
  };
Currently, btf type section has an alignment of 4 as all element types
are u32. Representing the value with __u64 will introduce a pad
for bpf_enum64 and may also introduce misalignment for the 64bit value.
Hence, two members of hi32 and lo32 are chosen to avoid these issues.

The kflag is also introduced for BTF_KIND_ENUM and BTF_KIND_ENUM64
to indicate whether the value is signed or unsigned. The kflag intends
to provide consistent output of BTF C fortmat with the original
source code. For example, the original BTF_KIND_ENUM bit value is 0xffffffff.
The format C has two choices, print out 0xffffffff or -1 and current libbpf
prints out as unsigned value. But if the signedness is preserved in btf,
the value can be printed the same as the original source code.

The new BTF_KIND_ENUM64 is intended to support the enum value represented as
64bit value. But it can represent all BTF_KIND_ENUM values as well.
The value size of BTF_KIND_ENUM64 is encoded to 8 to represent its intent.
The compiler ([1]) and pahole will generate BTF_KIND_ENUM64 only if the value has
to be represented with 64 bits.

  [1] https://reviews.llvm.org/D124641

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
---
 include/linux/btf.h            |  18 ++++-
 include/uapi/linux/btf.h       |  17 ++++-
 kernel/bpf/btf.c               | 132 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 tools/include/uapi/linux/btf.h |  17 ++++-
 4 files changed, 168 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/btf.h b/include/linux/btf.h
index 2611cea2c2b6..280c33c9414a 100644
--- a/include/linux/btf.h
+++ b/include/linux/btf.h
@@ -174,7 +174,8 @@ static inline bool btf_type_is_small_int(const struct btf_type *t)
 
 static inline bool btf_type_is_enum(const struct btf_type *t)
 {
-	return BTF_INFO_KIND(t->info) == BTF_KIND_ENUM;
+	return BTF_INFO_KIND(t->info) == BTF_KIND_ENUM ||
+	       BTF_INFO_KIND(t->info) == BTF_KIND_ENUM64;
 }
 
 static inline bool str_is_empty(const char *s)
@@ -192,6 +193,16 @@ static inline bool btf_is_enum(const struct btf_type *t)
 	return btf_kind(t) == BTF_KIND_ENUM;
 }
 
+static inline bool btf_is_enum64(const struct btf_type *t)
+{
+	return btf_kind(t) == BTF_KIND_ENUM64;
+}
+
+static inline u64 btf_enum64_value(const struct btf_enum64 *e)
+{
+	return (u64)e->hi32 << 32 | e->lo32;
+}
+
 static inline bool btf_is_composite(const struct btf_type *t)
 {
 	u16 kind = btf_kind(t);
@@ -332,6 +343,11 @@ static inline struct btf_enum *btf_enum(const struct btf_type *t)
 	return (struct btf_enum *)(t + 1);
 }
 
+static inline struct btf_enum64 *btf_enum64(const struct btf_type *t)
+{
+	return (struct btf_enum64 *)(t + 1);
+}
+
 static inline const struct btf_var_secinfo *btf_type_var_secinfo(
 		const struct btf_type *t)
 {
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/btf.h b/include/uapi/linux/btf.h
index a9162a6c0284..2aac226a27b2 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/btf.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/btf.h
@@ -36,10 +36,10 @@ struct btf_type {
 	 * bits 24-28: kind (e.g. int, ptr, array...etc)
 	 * bits 29-30: unused
 	 * bit     31: kind_flag, currently used by
-	 *             struct, union and fwd
+	 *             struct, union, enum, fwd and enum64
 	 */
 	__u32 info;
-	/* "size" is used by INT, ENUM, STRUCT, UNION and DATASEC.
+	/* "size" is used by INT, ENUM, STRUCT, UNION, DATASEC and ENUM64.
 	 * "size" tells the size of the type it is describing.
 	 *
 	 * "type" is used by PTR, TYPEDEF, VOLATILE, CONST, RESTRICT,
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ enum {
 	BTF_KIND_ARRAY		= 3,	/* Array	*/
 	BTF_KIND_STRUCT		= 4,	/* Struct	*/
 	BTF_KIND_UNION		= 5,	/* Union	*/
-	BTF_KIND_ENUM		= 6,	/* Enumeration	*/
+	BTF_KIND_ENUM		= 6,	/* Enumeration for int/unsigned int values */
 	BTF_KIND_FWD		= 7,	/* Forward	*/
 	BTF_KIND_TYPEDEF	= 8,	/* Typedef	*/
 	BTF_KIND_VOLATILE	= 9,	/* Volatile	*/
@@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ enum {
 	BTF_KIND_FLOAT		= 16,	/* Floating point	*/
 	BTF_KIND_DECL_TAG	= 17,	/* Decl Tag */
 	BTF_KIND_TYPE_TAG	= 18,	/* Type Tag */
+	BTF_KIND_ENUM64		= 19,	/* Enumeration for long/unsigned long values */
 
 	NR_BTF_KINDS,
 	BTF_KIND_MAX		= NR_BTF_KINDS - 1,
@@ -186,4 +187,14 @@ struct btf_decl_tag {
        __s32   component_idx;
 };
 
+/* BTF_KIND_ENUM64 is followed by multiple "struct btf_enum64".
+ * The exact number of btf_enum64 is stored in the vlen (of the
+ * info in "struct btf_type").
+ */
+struct btf_enum64 {
+	__u32	name_off;
+	__u32	hi32;
+	__u32	lo32;
+};
+
 #endif /* _UAPI__LINUX_BTF_H__ */
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
index 2f0b0440131c..17e24b362d3d 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
@@ -307,6 +307,7 @@ static const char * const btf_kind_str[NR_BTF_KINDS] = {
 	[BTF_KIND_FLOAT]	= "FLOAT",
 	[BTF_KIND_DECL_TAG]	= "DECL_TAG",
 	[BTF_KIND_TYPE_TAG]	= "TYPE_TAG",
+	[BTF_KIND_ENUM64]	= "ENUM64",
 };
 
 const char *btf_type_str(const struct btf_type *t)
@@ -664,6 +665,7 @@ static bool btf_type_has_size(const struct btf_type *t)
 	case BTF_KIND_ENUM:
 	case BTF_KIND_DATASEC:
 	case BTF_KIND_FLOAT:
+	case BTF_KIND_ENUM64:
 		return true;
 	}
 
@@ -709,6 +711,11 @@ static const struct btf_decl_tag *btf_type_decl_tag(const struct btf_type *t)
 	return (const struct btf_decl_tag *)(t + 1);
 }
 
+static const struct btf_enum64 *btf_type_enum64(const struct btf_type *t)
+{
+	return (const struct btf_enum64 *)(t + 1);
+}
+
 static const struct btf_kind_operations *btf_type_ops(const struct btf_type *t)
 {
 	return kind_ops[BTF_INFO_KIND(t->info)];
@@ -1017,6 +1024,7 @@ static const char *btf_show_name(struct btf_show *show)
 			parens = "{";
 		break;
 	case BTF_KIND_ENUM:
+	case BTF_KIND_ENUM64:
 		prefix = "enum";
 		break;
 	default:
@@ -1832,6 +1840,7 @@ __btf_resolve_size(const struct btf *btf, const struct btf_type *type,
 		case BTF_KIND_UNION:
 		case BTF_KIND_ENUM:
 		case BTF_KIND_FLOAT:
+		case BTF_KIND_ENUM64:
 			size = type->size;
 			goto resolved;
 
@@ -3668,6 +3677,7 @@ static s32 btf_enum_check_meta(struct btf_verifier_env *env,
 {
 	const struct btf_enum *enums = btf_type_enum(t);
 	struct btf *btf = env->btf;
+	const char *fmt_str;
 	u16 i, nr_enums;
 	u32 meta_needed;
 
@@ -3681,11 +3691,6 @@ static s32 btf_enum_check_meta(struct btf_verifier_env *env,
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	if (btf_type_kflag(t)) {
-		btf_verifier_log_type(env, t, "Invalid btf_info kind_flag");
-		return -EINVAL;
-	}
-
 	if (t->size > 8 || !is_power_of_2(t->size)) {
 		btf_verifier_log_type(env, t, "Unexpected size");
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -3716,7 +3721,8 @@ static s32 btf_enum_check_meta(struct btf_verifier_env *env,
 
 		if (env->log.level == BPF_LOG_KERNEL)
 			continue;
-		btf_verifier_log(env, "\t%s val=%d\n",
+		fmt_str = btf_type_kflag(t) ? "\t%s val=%u\n" : "\t%s val=%d\n";
+		btf_verifier_log(env, fmt_str,
 				 __btf_name_by_offset(btf, enums[i].name_off),
 				 enums[i].val);
 	}
@@ -3757,7 +3763,10 @@ static void btf_enum_show(const struct btf *btf, const struct btf_type *t,
 		return;
 	}
 
-	btf_show_type_value(show, "%d", v);
+	if (btf_type_kflag(t))
+		btf_show_type_value(show, "%u", v);
+	else
+		btf_show_type_value(show, "%d", v);
 	btf_show_end_type(show);
 }
 
@@ -3770,6 +3779,109 @@ static struct btf_kind_operations enum_ops = {
 	.show = btf_enum_show,
 };
 
+static s32 btf_enum64_check_meta(struct btf_verifier_env *env,
+				 const struct btf_type *t,
+				 u32 meta_left)
+{
+	const struct btf_enum64 *enums = btf_type_enum64(t);
+	struct btf *btf = env->btf;
+	const char *fmt_str;
+	u16 i, nr_enums;
+	u32 meta_needed;
+
+	nr_enums = btf_type_vlen(t);
+	meta_needed = nr_enums * sizeof(*enums);
+
+	if (meta_left < meta_needed) {
+		btf_verifier_log_basic(env, t,
+				       "meta_left:%u meta_needed:%u",
+				       meta_left, meta_needed);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	if (t->size != 8) {
+		btf_verifier_log_type(env, t, "Unexpected size");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	/* enum type either no name or a valid one */
+	if (t->name_off &&
+	    !btf_name_valid_identifier(env->btf, t->name_off)) {
+		btf_verifier_log_type(env, t, "Invalid name");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	btf_verifier_log_type(env, t, NULL);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < nr_enums; i++) {
+		if (!btf_name_offset_valid(btf, enums[i].name_off)) {
+			btf_verifier_log(env, "\tInvalid name_offset:%u",
+					 enums[i].name_off);
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+
+		/* enum member must have a valid name */
+		if (!enums[i].name_off ||
+		    !btf_name_valid_identifier(btf, enums[i].name_off)) {
+			btf_verifier_log_type(env, t, "Invalid name");
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+
+		if (env->log.level == BPF_LOG_KERNEL)
+			continue;
+
+		fmt_str = btf_type_kflag(t) ? "\t%s val=%llu\n" : "\t%s val=%lld\n";
+		btf_verifier_log(env, fmt_str,
+				 __btf_name_by_offset(btf, enums[i].name_off),
+				 btf_enum64_value(enums + i));
+	}
+
+	return meta_needed;
+}
+
+static void btf_enum64_show(const struct btf *btf, const struct btf_type *t,
+			    u32 type_id, void *data, u8 bits_offset,
+			    struct btf_show *show)
+{
+	const struct btf_enum64 *enums = btf_type_enum64(t);
+	u32 i, nr_enums = btf_type_vlen(t);
+	void *safe_data;
+	s64 v;
+
+	safe_data = btf_show_start_type(show, t, type_id, data);
+	if (!safe_data)
+		return;
+
+	v = *(u64 *)safe_data;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < nr_enums; i++) {
+		if (v != btf_enum64_value(enums + i))
+			continue;
+
+		btf_show_type_value(show, "%s",
+				    __btf_name_by_offset(btf,
+							 enums[i].name_off));
+
+		btf_show_end_type(show);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	if (btf_type_kflag(t))
+		btf_show_type_value(show, "%llu", v);
+	else
+		btf_show_type_value(show, "%lld", v);
+	btf_show_end_type(show);
+}
+
+static struct btf_kind_operations enum64_ops = {
+	.check_meta = btf_enum64_check_meta,
+	.resolve = btf_df_resolve,
+	.check_member = btf_enum_check_member,
+	.check_kflag_member = btf_enum_check_kflag_member,
+	.log_details = btf_enum_log,
+	.show = btf_enum64_show,
+};
+
 static s32 btf_func_proto_check_meta(struct btf_verifier_env *env,
 				     const struct btf_type *t,
 				     u32 meta_left)
@@ -4436,6 +4548,7 @@ static const struct btf_kind_operations * const kind_ops[NR_BTF_KINDS] = {
 	[BTF_KIND_FLOAT] = &float_ops,
 	[BTF_KIND_DECL_TAG] = &decl_tag_ops,
 	[BTF_KIND_TYPE_TAG] = &modifier_ops,
+	[BTF_KIND_ENUM64] = &enum64_ops,
 };
 
 static s32 btf_check_meta(struct btf_verifier_env *env,
@@ -7329,6 +7442,7 @@ int __bpf_core_types_are_compat(const struct btf *local_btf, __u32 local_id,
 	case BTF_KIND_UNION:
 	case BTF_KIND_ENUM:
 	case BTF_KIND_FWD:
+	case BTF_KIND_ENUM64:
 		return 1;
 	case BTF_KIND_INT:
 		/* just reject deprecated bitfield-like integers; all other
@@ -7381,10 +7495,10 @@ int __bpf_core_types_are_compat(const struct btf *local_btf, __u32 local_id,
  * field-based relocations. This function assumes that root types were already
  * checked for name match. Beyond that initial root-level name check, names
  * are completely ignored. Compatibility rules are as follows:
- *   - any two STRUCTs/UNIONs/FWDs/ENUMs/INTs are considered compatible, but
+ *   - any two STRUCTs/UNIONs/FWDs/ENUMs/INTs/ENUM64s are considered compatible, but
  *     kind should match for local and target types (i.e., STRUCT is not
  *     compatible with UNION);
- *   - for ENUMs, the size is ignored;
+ *   - for ENUMs/ENUM64s, the size is ignored;
  *   - for INT, size and signedness are ignored;
  *   - for ARRAY, dimensionality is ignored, element types are checked for
  *     compatibility recursively;
diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/btf.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/btf.h
index a9162a6c0284..2aac226a27b2 100644
--- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/btf.h
+++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/btf.h
@@ -36,10 +36,10 @@ struct btf_type {
 	 * bits 24-28: kind (e.g. int, ptr, array...etc)
 	 * bits 29-30: unused
 	 * bit     31: kind_flag, currently used by
-	 *             struct, union and fwd
+	 *             struct, union, enum, fwd and enum64
 	 */
 	__u32 info;
-	/* "size" is used by INT, ENUM, STRUCT, UNION and DATASEC.
+	/* "size" is used by INT, ENUM, STRUCT, UNION, DATASEC and ENUM64.
 	 * "size" tells the size of the type it is describing.
 	 *
 	 * "type" is used by PTR, TYPEDEF, VOLATILE, CONST, RESTRICT,
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ enum {
 	BTF_KIND_ARRAY		= 3,	/* Array	*/
 	BTF_KIND_STRUCT		= 4,	/* Struct	*/
 	BTF_KIND_UNION		= 5,	/* Union	*/
-	BTF_KIND_ENUM		= 6,	/* Enumeration	*/
+	BTF_KIND_ENUM		= 6,	/* Enumeration for int/unsigned int values */
 	BTF_KIND_FWD		= 7,	/* Forward	*/
 	BTF_KIND_TYPEDEF	= 8,	/* Typedef	*/
 	BTF_KIND_VOLATILE	= 9,	/* Volatile	*/
@@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ enum {
 	BTF_KIND_FLOAT		= 16,	/* Floating point	*/
 	BTF_KIND_DECL_TAG	= 17,	/* Decl Tag */
 	BTF_KIND_TYPE_TAG	= 18,	/* Type Tag */
+	BTF_KIND_ENUM64		= 19,	/* Enumeration for long/unsigned long values */
 
 	NR_BTF_KINDS,
 	BTF_KIND_MAX		= NR_BTF_KINDS - 1,
@@ -186,4 +187,14 @@ struct btf_decl_tag {
        __s32   component_idx;
 };
 
+/* BTF_KIND_ENUM64 is followed by multiple "struct btf_enum64".
+ * The exact number of btf_enum64 is stored in the vlen (of the
+ * info in "struct btf_type").
+ */
+struct btf_enum64 {
+	__u32	name_off;
+	__u32	hi32;
+	__u32	lo32;
+};
+
 #endif /* _UAPI__LINUX_BTF_H__ */
-- 
2.30.2


  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-01 19:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-01 19:00 [PATCH bpf-next 00/12] bpf: Add 64bit enum value support Yonghong Song
2022-05-01 19:00 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2022-05-09  0:33   ` [PATCH bpf-next 01/12] bpf: Add btf enum64 support Dave Marchevsky
2022-05-09 22:29   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-10 22:06     ` Yonghong Song
2022-05-10 23:18       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-11  0:17         ` Yonghong Song
2022-05-01 19:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next 02/12] libbpf: Permit 64bit relocation value Yonghong Song
2022-05-09  1:06   ` Dave Marchevsky
2022-05-10 19:35     ` Yonghong Song
2022-05-09 22:37   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-10 22:14     ` Yonghong Song
2022-05-10 23:19       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-01 19:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next 03/12] libbpf: Fix an error in 64bit relocation value computation Yonghong Song
2022-05-09  0:55   ` Dave Marchevsky
2022-05-09  0:56     ` Dave Marchevsky
2022-05-09 22:37   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-10 22:11     ` Yonghong Song
2022-05-01 19:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next 04/12] libbpf: Add btf enum64 support Yonghong Song
2022-05-03 17:22   ` kernel test robot
2022-05-05 22:44     ` Yonghong Song
2022-05-05 22:44       ` Yonghong Song
2022-05-09 23:25   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-10 22:40     ` Yonghong Song
2022-05-10 23:02       ` Yonghong Song
2022-05-10 23:40         ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-10 23:38       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-11  0:39         ` Yonghong Song
2022-05-11 17:43           ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-11 18:56             ` Yonghong Song
2022-05-01 19:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next 05/12] bpftool: " Yonghong Song
2022-05-09 23:31   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-10 22:43     ` Yonghong Song
2022-05-01 19:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next 06/12] selftests/bpf: Fix selftests failure Yonghong Song
2022-05-09  2:21   ` Dave Marchevsky
2022-05-10 19:40     ` Yonghong Song
2022-05-09 23:34   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-10 22:44     ` Yonghong Song
2022-05-01 19:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next 07/12] selftests/bpf: Test new libbpf enum32/enum64 API functions Yonghong Song
2022-05-01 19:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next 08/12] selftests/bpf: Add BTF_KIND_ENUM64 unit tests Yonghong Song
2022-05-01 19:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next 09/12] selftests/bpf: Test BTF_KIND_ENUM64 for deduplication Yonghong Song
2022-05-09 23:37   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-10 22:44     ` Yonghong Song
2022-05-01 19:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next 10/12] selftests/bpf: add a test for enum64 value relocation Yonghong Song
2022-05-09 23:38   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-10 22:45     ` Yonghong Song
2022-05-01 19:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next 11/12] selftests/bpf: Clarify llvm dependency with possible selftest failures Yonghong Song
2022-05-01 19:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next 12/12] docs/bpf: Update documentation for BTF_KIND_ENUM64 support Yonghong Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220501190007.2576808-1-yhs@fb.com \
    --to=yhs@fb.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.