From: Phillip Potter <phil@philpotter.co.uk>
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net, straube.linux@gmail.com,
dan.carpenter@oracle.com, jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn,
linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] staging: r8188eu: fix rtw_alloc_hwxmits error detection for now
Date: Sat, 21 May 2022 21:47:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220521204741.921-1-phil@philpotter.co.uk> (raw)
In _rtw_init_xmit_priv, we use the res variable to store the error
return from the newly converted rtw_alloc_hwxmits function. Sadly, the
calling function interprets res using _SUCCESS and _FAIL still, meaning
we change the semantics of the variable, even in the success case.
This leads to the following on boot:
r8188eu 1-2:1.0: _rtw_init_xmit_priv failed
In the long term, we should reverse these semantics, but for now, this
fixes the driver. Also, inside rtw_alloc_hwxmits remove the if blocks,
as HWXMIT_ENTRY is always 4.
Fixes: f94b47c6bde6 ("staging: r8188eu: add check for kzalloc")
Signed-off-by: Phillip Potter <phil@philpotter.co.uk>
---
drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_xmit.c | 20 +++++---------------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_xmit.c b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_xmit.c
index 3d8e9dea7651..7135d89caac1 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_xmit.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_xmit.c
@@ -178,8 +178,7 @@ s32 _rtw_init_xmit_priv(struct xmit_priv *pxmitpriv, struct adapter *padapter)
pxmitpriv->free_xmit_extbuf_cnt = num_xmit_extbuf;
- res = rtw_alloc_hwxmits(padapter);
- if (res) {
+ if (rtw_alloc_hwxmits(padapter)) {
res = _FAIL;
goto exit;
}
@@ -1483,19 +1482,10 @@ int rtw_alloc_hwxmits(struct adapter *padapter)
hwxmits = pxmitpriv->hwxmits;
- if (pxmitpriv->hwxmit_entry == 5) {
- hwxmits[0] .sta_queue = &pxmitpriv->bm_pending;
- hwxmits[1] .sta_queue = &pxmitpriv->vo_pending;
- hwxmits[2] .sta_queue = &pxmitpriv->vi_pending;
- hwxmits[3] .sta_queue = &pxmitpriv->bk_pending;
- hwxmits[4] .sta_queue = &pxmitpriv->be_pending;
- } else if (pxmitpriv->hwxmit_entry == 4) {
- hwxmits[0] .sta_queue = &pxmitpriv->vo_pending;
- hwxmits[1] .sta_queue = &pxmitpriv->vi_pending;
- hwxmits[2] .sta_queue = &pxmitpriv->be_pending;
- hwxmits[3] .sta_queue = &pxmitpriv->bk_pending;
- } else {
- }
+ hwxmits[0].sta_queue = &pxmitpriv->vo_pending;
+ hwxmits[1].sta_queue = &pxmitpriv->vi_pending;
+ hwxmits[2].sta_queue = &pxmitpriv->be_pending;
+ hwxmits[3].sta_queue = &pxmitpriv->bk_pending;
return 0;
}
--
2.35.3
reply other threads:[~2022-05-21 20:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220521204741.921-1-phil@philpotter.co.uk \
--to=phil@philpotter.co.uk \
--cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=straube.linux@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.