All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rongwei Wang <rongwei.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, vbabka@suse.cz,
	roman.gushchin@linux.dev, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com,
	rientjes@google.com, penberg@kernel.org, cl@linux.com
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] mm/slub: improve consistency of nr_slabs count
Date: Sun, 29 May 2022 16:15:34 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220529081535.69275-2-rongwei.wang@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220529081535.69275-1-rongwei.wang@linux.alibaba.com>

Currently, discard_slab() can change nr_slabs count
without holding node's list_lock. This will lead some
error messages print when scanning node's partial or
full list, e.g. validate all slabs. Literally, it
affects the consistency of nr_slabs count.

Here, discard_slab() is abandoned, And dec_slabs_node()
is called before releasing node's list_lock.
dec_slabs_nodes() and free_slab() can be called separately
to ensure consistency of nr_slabs count.

Signed-off-by: Rongwei Wang <rongwei.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
---
 mm/slub.c | 26 ++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index 310e56d99116..bffb95bbb0ee 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -2039,12 +2039,6 @@ static void free_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab)
 		__free_slab(s, slab);
 }
 
-static void discard_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab)
-{
-	dec_slabs_node(s, slab_nid(slab), slab->objects);
-	free_slab(s, slab);
-}
-
 /*
  * Management of partially allocated slabs.
  */
@@ -2413,6 +2407,7 @@ static void deactivate_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab,
 
 	if (!new.inuse && n->nr_partial >= s->min_partial) {
 		mode = M_FREE;
+		spin_lock_irqsave(&n->list_lock, flags);
 	} else if (new.freelist) {
 		mode = M_PARTIAL;
 		/*
@@ -2437,7 +2432,7 @@ static void deactivate_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab,
 				old.freelist, old.counters,
 				new.freelist, new.counters,
 				"unfreezing slab")) {
-		if (mode == M_PARTIAL || mode == M_FULL)
+		if (mode != M_FULL_NOLIST)
 			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&n->list_lock, flags);
 		goto redo;
 	}
@@ -2449,7 +2444,10 @@ static void deactivate_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab,
 		stat(s, tail);
 	} else if (mode == M_FREE) {
 		stat(s, DEACTIVATE_EMPTY);
-		discard_slab(s, slab);
+		dec_slabs_node(s, slab_nid(slab), slab->objects);
+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&n->list_lock, flags);
+
+		free_slab(s, slab);
 		stat(s, FREE_SLAB);
 	} else if (mode == M_FULL) {
 		add_full(s, n, slab);
@@ -2502,6 +2500,7 @@ static void __unfreeze_partials(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *partial_slab)
 		if (unlikely(!new.inuse && n->nr_partial >= s->min_partial)) {
 			slab->next = slab_to_discard;
 			slab_to_discard = slab;
+			dec_slabs_node(s, slab_nid(slab), slab->objects);
 		} else {
 			add_partial(n, slab, DEACTIVATE_TO_TAIL);
 			stat(s, FREE_ADD_PARTIAL);
@@ -2516,7 +2515,7 @@ static void __unfreeze_partials(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *partial_slab)
 		slab_to_discard = slab_to_discard->next;
 
 		stat(s, DEACTIVATE_EMPTY);
-		discard_slab(s, slab);
+		free_slab(s, slab);
 		stat(s, FREE_SLAB);
 	}
 }
@@ -3404,9 +3403,10 @@ static void __slab_free(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab,
 		remove_full(s, n, slab);
 	}
 
+	dec_slabs_node(s, slab_nid(slab), slab->objects);
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&n->list_lock, flags);
 	stat(s, FREE_SLAB);
-	discard_slab(s, slab);
+	free_slab(s, slab);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -4265,6 +4265,7 @@ static void free_partial(struct kmem_cache *s, struct kmem_cache_node *n)
 		if (!slab->inuse) {
 			remove_partial(n, slab);
 			list_add(&slab->slab_list, &discard);
+			dec_slabs_node(s, slab_nid(slab), slab->objects);
 		} else {
 			list_slab_objects(s, slab,
 			  "Objects remaining in %s on __kmem_cache_shutdown()");
@@ -4273,7 +4274,7 @@ static void free_partial(struct kmem_cache *s, struct kmem_cache_node *n)
 	spin_unlock_irq(&n->list_lock);
 
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(slab, h, &discard, slab_list)
-		discard_slab(s, slab);
+		free_slab(s, slab);
 }
 
 bool __kmem_cache_empty(struct kmem_cache *s)
@@ -4595,6 +4596,7 @@ static int __kmem_cache_do_shrink(struct kmem_cache *s)
 			if (free == slab->objects) {
 				list_move(&slab->slab_list, &discard);
 				n->nr_partial--;
+				dec_slabs_node(s, slab_nid(slab), slab->objects);
 			} else if (free <= SHRINK_PROMOTE_MAX)
 				list_move(&slab->slab_list, promote + free - 1);
 		}
@@ -4610,7 +4612,7 @@ static int __kmem_cache_do_shrink(struct kmem_cache *s)
 
 		/* Release empty slabs */
 		list_for_each_entry_safe(slab, t, &discard, slab_list)
-			discard_slab(s, slab);
+			free_slab(s, slab);
 
 		if (slabs_node(s, node))
 			ret = 1;
-- 
2.27.0


  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-29  8:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-29  8:15 [PATCH 1/3] mm/slub: fix the race between validate_slab and slab_free Rongwei Wang
2022-05-29  8:15 ` Rongwei Wang [this message]
2022-05-29 12:26   ` [PATCH 2/3] mm/slub: improve consistency of nr_slabs count Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-05-29  8:15 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm/slub: add nr_full count for debugging slub Rongwei Wang
2022-05-29 11:37 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm/slub: fix the race between validate_slab and slab_free Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-05-30 21:14   ` David Rientjes
2022-06-02 15:14     ` Christoph Lameter
2022-06-03  3:35       ` Rongwei Wang
2022-06-07 12:14         ` Christoph Lameter
2022-06-08  3:04           ` Rongwei Wang
2022-06-08 12:23             ` Christoph Lameter
2022-06-11  4:04               ` Rongwei Wang
2022-06-13 13:50                 ` Christoph Lameter
2022-06-14  2:38                   ` Rongwei Wang
2022-06-17  7:55                   ` Rongwei Wang
2022-06-17 14:19                     ` Christoph Lameter
2022-06-18  2:33                       ` Rongwei Wang
2022-06-20 11:57                         ` Christoph Lameter
2022-06-26 16:48                           ` Rongwei Wang
2022-06-17  9:40               ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-07-15  8:05                 ` Rongwei Wang
2022-07-15 10:33                   ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-07-15 10:51                     ` Rongwei Wang
2022-05-31  3:47   ` Muchun Song
2022-06-04 11:05     ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-05-31  8:50   ` Rongwei Wang
2022-07-18 11:09 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-07-19 14:15   ` Rongwei Wang
2022-07-19 14:21     ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-07-19 14:43       ` Rongwei Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220529081535.69275-2-rongwei.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=rongwei.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.