All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>,
	Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@meta.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v10 23/24] selftests/bpf: Add BTF sanity tests
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 07:26:13 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221118015614.2013203-24-memxor@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221118015614.2013203-1-memxor@gmail.com>

Preparing the metadata for bpf_list_head involves a complicated parsing
step and type resolution for the contained value. Ensure that corner
cases are tested against and invalid specifications in source are duly
rejected. Also include tests for incorrect ownership relationships in
the BTF.

Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/linked_list.c    | 485 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 485 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/linked_list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/linked_list.c
index 41e588807321..dd73d0a62c6e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/linked_list.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/linked_list.c
@@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
 // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include <bpf/btf.h>
+#include <test_btf.h>
+#include <linux/btf.h>
 #include <test_progs.h>
 #include <network_helpers.h>
 
@@ -235,6 +238,487 @@ static void test_linked_list_success(int mode, bool leave_in_map)
 	linked_list__destroy(skel);
 }
 
+#define SPIN_LOCK 2
+#define LIST_HEAD 3
+#define LIST_NODE 4
+
+static struct btf *init_btf(void)
+{
+	int id, lid, hid, nid;
+	struct btf *btf;
+
+	btf = btf__new_empty();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(btf, "btf__new_empty"))
+		return NULL;
+	id = btf__add_int(btf, "int", 4, BTF_INT_SIGNED);
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 1, "btf__add_int"))
+		goto end;
+	lid = btf__add_struct(btf, "bpf_spin_lock", 4);
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(lid, SPIN_LOCK, "btf__add_struct bpf_spin_lock"))
+		goto end;
+	hid = btf__add_struct(btf, "bpf_list_head", 16);
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(hid, LIST_HEAD, "btf__add_struct bpf_list_head"))
+		goto end;
+	nid = btf__add_struct(btf, "bpf_list_node", 16);
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(nid, LIST_NODE, "btf__add_struct bpf_list_node"))
+		goto end;
+	return btf;
+end:
+	btf__free(btf);
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+static void test_btf(void)
+{
+	struct btf *btf = NULL;
+	int id, err;
+
+	while (test__start_subtest("btf: too many locks")) {
+		btf = init_btf();
+		if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(btf, "init_btf"))
+			break;
+		id = btf__add_struct(btf, "foo", 24);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 5, "btf__add_struct foo"))
+			break;
+		err = btf__add_field(btf, "a", SPIN_LOCK, 0, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_struct foo::a"))
+			break;
+		err = btf__add_field(btf, "b", SPIN_LOCK, 32, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_struct foo::a"))
+			break;
+		err = btf__add_field(btf, "c", LIST_HEAD, 64, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_struct foo::a"))
+			break;
+
+		err = btf__load_into_kernel(btf);
+		ASSERT_EQ(err, -E2BIG, "check btf");
+		btf__free(btf);
+		break;
+	}
+
+	while (test__start_subtest("btf: missing lock")) {
+		btf = init_btf();
+		if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(btf, "init_btf"))
+			break;
+		id = btf__add_struct(btf, "foo", 16);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 5, "btf__add_struct foo"))
+			break;
+		err = btf__add_field(btf, "a", LIST_HEAD, 0, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_struct foo::a"))
+			break;
+		id = btf__add_decl_tag(btf, "contains:baz:a", 5, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 6, "btf__add_decl_tag contains:baz:a"))
+			break;
+		id = btf__add_struct(btf, "baz", 16);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 7, "btf__add_struct baz"))
+			break;
+		err = btf__add_field(btf, "a", LIST_NODE, 0, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field baz::a"))
+			break;
+
+		err = btf__load_into_kernel(btf);
+		ASSERT_EQ(err, -EINVAL, "check btf");
+		btf__free(btf);
+		break;
+	}
+
+	while (test__start_subtest("btf: bad offset")) {
+		btf = init_btf();
+		if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(btf, "init_btf"))
+			break;
+		id = btf__add_struct(btf, "foo", 36);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 5, "btf__add_struct foo"))
+			break;
+		err = btf__add_field(btf, "a", LIST_HEAD, 0, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field foo::a"))
+			break;
+		err = btf__add_field(btf, "b", LIST_NODE, 0, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field foo::b"))
+			break;
+		err = btf__add_field(btf, "c", SPIN_LOCK, 0, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field foo::c"))
+			break;
+		id = btf__add_decl_tag(btf, "contains:foo:b", 5, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 6, "btf__add_decl_tag contains:foo:b"))
+			break;
+
+		err = btf__load_into_kernel(btf);
+		ASSERT_EQ(err, -EEXIST, "check btf");
+		btf__free(btf);
+		break;
+	}
+
+	while (test__start_subtest("btf: missing contains:")) {
+		btf = init_btf();
+		if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(btf, "init_btf"))
+			break;
+		id = btf__add_struct(btf, "foo", 24);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 5, "btf__add_struct foo"))
+			break;
+		err = btf__add_field(btf, "a", SPIN_LOCK, 0, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field foo::a"))
+			break;
+		err = btf__add_field(btf, "b", LIST_HEAD, 64, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field foo::b"))
+			break;
+
+		err = btf__load_into_kernel(btf);
+		ASSERT_EQ(err, -EINVAL, "check btf");
+		btf__free(btf);
+		break;
+	}
+
+	while (test__start_subtest("btf: missing struct")) {
+		btf = init_btf();
+		if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(btf, "init_btf"))
+			break;
+		id = btf__add_struct(btf, "foo", 24);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 5, "btf__add_struct foo"))
+			break;
+		err = btf__add_field(btf, "a", SPIN_LOCK, 0, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field foo::a"))
+			break;
+		err = btf__add_field(btf, "b", LIST_HEAD, 64, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field foo::b"))
+			break;
+		id = btf__add_decl_tag(btf, "contains:bar:bar", 5, 1);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 6, "btf__add_decl_tag contains:bar:bar"))
+			break;
+
+		err = btf__load_into_kernel(btf);
+		ASSERT_EQ(err, -ENOENT, "check btf");
+		btf__free(btf);
+		break;
+	}
+
+	while (test__start_subtest("btf: missing node")) {
+		btf = init_btf();
+		if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(btf, "init_btf"))
+			break;
+		id = btf__add_struct(btf, "foo", 24);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 5, "btf__add_struct foo"))
+			break;
+		err = btf__add_field(btf, "a", SPIN_LOCK, 0, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field foo::a"))
+			break;
+		err = btf__add_field(btf, "b", LIST_HEAD, 64, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field foo::b"))
+			break;
+		id = btf__add_decl_tag(btf, "contains:foo:c", 5, 1);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 6, "btf__add_decl_tag contains:foo:c"))
+			break;
+
+		err = btf__load_into_kernel(btf);
+		btf__free(btf);
+		ASSERT_EQ(err, -ENOENT, "check btf");
+		break;
+	}
+
+	while (test__start_subtest("btf: node incorrect type")) {
+		btf = init_btf();
+		if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(btf, "init_btf"))
+			break;
+		id = btf__add_struct(btf, "foo", 20);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 5, "btf__add_struct foo"))
+			break;
+		err = btf__add_field(btf, "a", LIST_HEAD, 0, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field foo::a"))
+			break;
+		err = btf__add_field(btf, "b", SPIN_LOCK, 128, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field foo::b"))
+			break;
+		id = btf__add_decl_tag(btf, "contains:bar:a", 5, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 6, "btf__add_decl_tag contains:bar:a"))
+			break;
+		id = btf__add_struct(btf, "bar", 4);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 7, "btf__add_struct bar"))
+			break;
+		err = btf__add_field(btf, "a", SPIN_LOCK, 0, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field bar::a"))
+			break;
+
+		err = btf__load_into_kernel(btf);
+		ASSERT_EQ(err, -EINVAL, "check btf");
+		btf__free(btf);
+		break;
+	}
+
+	while (test__start_subtest("btf: multiple bpf_list_node with name b")) {
+		btf = init_btf();
+		if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(btf, "init_btf"))
+			break;
+		id = btf__add_struct(btf, "foo", 52);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 5, "btf__add_struct foo"))
+			break;
+		err = btf__add_field(btf, "a", LIST_HEAD, 0, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field foo::a"))
+			break;
+		err = btf__add_field(btf, "b", LIST_NODE, 128, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field foo::b"))
+			break;
+		err = btf__add_field(btf, "b", LIST_NODE, 256, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field foo::c"))
+			break;
+		err = btf__add_field(btf, "d", SPIN_LOCK, 384, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field foo::d"))
+			break;
+		id = btf__add_decl_tag(btf, "contains:foo:b", 5, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 6, "btf__add_decl_tag contains:foo:b"))
+			break;
+
+		err = btf__load_into_kernel(btf);
+		ASSERT_EQ(err, -EINVAL, "check btf");
+		btf__free(btf);
+		break;
+	}
+
+	while (test__start_subtest("btf: owning | owned AA cycle")) {
+		btf = init_btf();
+		if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(btf, "init_btf"))
+			break;
+		id = btf__add_struct(btf, "foo", 36);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 5, "btf__add_struct foo"))
+			break;
+		err = btf__add_field(btf, "a", LIST_HEAD, 0, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field foo::a"))
+			break;
+		err = btf__add_field(btf, "b", LIST_NODE, 128, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field foo::b"))
+			break;
+		err = btf__add_field(btf, "c", SPIN_LOCK, 256, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field foo::c"))
+			break;
+		id = btf__add_decl_tag(btf, "contains:foo:b", 5, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 6, "btf__add_decl_tag contains:foo:b"))
+			break;
+
+		err = btf__load_into_kernel(btf);
+		ASSERT_EQ(err, -ELOOP, "check btf");
+		btf__free(btf);
+		break;
+	}
+
+	while (test__start_subtest("btf: owning | owned ABA cycle")) {
+		btf = init_btf();
+		if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(btf, "init_btf"))
+			break;
+		id = btf__add_struct(btf, "foo", 36);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 5, "btf__add_struct foo"))
+			break;
+		err = btf__add_field(btf, "a", LIST_HEAD, 0, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field foo::a"))
+			break;
+		err = btf__add_field(btf, "b", LIST_NODE, 128, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field foo::b"))
+			break;
+		err = btf__add_field(btf, "c", SPIN_LOCK, 256, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field foo::c"))
+			break;
+		id = btf__add_decl_tag(btf, "contains:bar:b", 5, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 6, "btf__add_decl_tag contains:bar:b"))
+			break;
+		id = btf__add_struct(btf, "bar", 36);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 7, "btf__add_struct bar"))
+			break;
+		err = btf__add_field(btf, "a", LIST_HEAD, 0, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field bar::a"))
+			break;
+		err = btf__add_field(btf, "b", LIST_NODE, 128, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field bar::b"))
+			break;
+		err = btf__add_field(btf, "c", SPIN_LOCK, 256, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field bar::c"))
+			break;
+		id = btf__add_decl_tag(btf, "contains:foo:b", 7, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 8, "btf__add_decl_tag contains:foo:b"))
+			break;
+
+		err = btf__load_into_kernel(btf);
+		ASSERT_EQ(err, -ELOOP, "check btf");
+		btf__free(btf);
+		break;
+	}
+
+	while (test__start_subtest("btf: owning -> owned")) {
+		btf = init_btf();
+		if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(btf, "init_btf"))
+			break;
+		id = btf__add_struct(btf, "foo", 20);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 5, "btf__add_struct foo"))
+			break;
+		err = btf__add_field(btf, "a", LIST_HEAD, 0, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field foo::a"))
+			break;
+		err = btf__add_field(btf, "b", SPIN_LOCK, 128, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field foo::b"))
+			break;
+		id = btf__add_decl_tag(btf, "contains:bar:a", 5, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 6, "btf__add_decl_tag contains:bar:a"))
+			break;
+		id = btf__add_struct(btf, "bar", 16);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 7, "btf__add_struct bar"))
+			break;
+		err = btf__add_field(btf, "a", LIST_NODE, 0, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field bar::a"))
+			break;
+
+		err = btf__load_into_kernel(btf);
+		ASSERT_EQ(err, 0, "check btf");
+		btf__free(btf);
+		break;
+	}
+
+	while (test__start_subtest("btf: owning -> owning | owned -> owned")) {
+		btf = init_btf();
+		if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(btf, "init_btf"))
+			break;
+		id = btf__add_struct(btf, "foo", 20);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 5, "btf__add_struct foo"))
+			break;
+		err = btf__add_field(btf, "a", LIST_HEAD, 0, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field foo::a"))
+			break;
+		err = btf__add_field(btf, "b", SPIN_LOCK, 128, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field foo::b"))
+			break;
+		id = btf__add_decl_tag(btf, "contains:bar:b", 5, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 6, "btf__add_decl_tag contains:bar:b"))
+			break;
+		id = btf__add_struct(btf, "bar", 36);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 7, "btf__add_struct bar"))
+			break;
+		err = btf__add_field(btf, "a", LIST_HEAD, 0, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field bar::a"))
+			break;
+		err = btf__add_field(btf, "b", LIST_NODE, 128, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field bar::b"))
+			break;
+		err = btf__add_field(btf, "c", SPIN_LOCK, 256, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field bar::c"))
+			break;
+		id = btf__add_decl_tag(btf, "contains:baz:a", 7, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 8, "btf__add_decl_tag contains:baz:a"))
+			break;
+		id = btf__add_struct(btf, "baz", 16);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 9, "btf__add_struct baz"))
+			break;
+		err = btf__add_field(btf, "a", LIST_NODE, 0, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field baz:a"))
+			break;
+
+		err = btf__load_into_kernel(btf);
+		ASSERT_EQ(err, 0, "check btf");
+		btf__free(btf);
+		break;
+	}
+
+	while (test__start_subtest("btf: owning | owned -> owning | owned -> owned")) {
+		btf = init_btf();
+		if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(btf, "init_btf"))
+			break;
+		id = btf__add_struct(btf, "foo", 36);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 5, "btf__add_struct foo"))
+			break;
+		err = btf__add_field(btf, "a", LIST_HEAD, 0, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field foo::a"))
+			break;
+		err = btf__add_field(btf, "b", LIST_NODE, 128, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field foo::b"))
+			break;
+		err = btf__add_field(btf, "c", SPIN_LOCK, 256, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field foo::c"))
+			break;
+		id = btf__add_decl_tag(btf, "contains:bar:b", 5, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 6, "btf__add_decl_tag contains:bar:b"))
+			break;
+		id = btf__add_struct(btf, "bar", 36);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 7, "btf__add_struct bar"))
+			break;
+		err = btf__add_field(btf, "a", LIST_HEAD, 0, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field bar:a"))
+			break;
+		err = btf__add_field(btf, "b", LIST_NODE, 128, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field bar:b"))
+			break;
+		err = btf__add_field(btf, "c", SPIN_LOCK, 256, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field bar:c"))
+			break;
+		id = btf__add_decl_tag(btf, "contains:baz:a", 7, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 8, "btf__add_decl_tag contains:baz:a"))
+			break;
+		id = btf__add_struct(btf, "baz", 16);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 9, "btf__add_struct baz"))
+			break;
+		err = btf__add_field(btf, "a", LIST_NODE, 0, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field baz:a"))
+			break;
+
+		err = btf__load_into_kernel(btf);
+		ASSERT_EQ(err, -ELOOP, "check btf");
+		btf__free(btf);
+		break;
+	}
+
+	while (test__start_subtest("btf: owning -> owning | owned -> owning | owned -> owned")) {
+		btf = init_btf();
+		if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(btf, "init_btf"))
+			break;
+		id = btf__add_struct(btf, "foo", 20);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 5, "btf__add_struct foo"))
+			break;
+		err = btf__add_field(btf, "a", LIST_HEAD, 0, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field foo::a"))
+			break;
+		err = btf__add_field(btf, "b", SPIN_LOCK, 128, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field foo::b"))
+			break;
+		id = btf__add_decl_tag(btf, "contains:bar:b", 5, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 6, "btf__add_decl_tag contains:bar:b"))
+			break;
+		id = btf__add_struct(btf, "bar", 36);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 7, "btf__add_struct bar"))
+			break;
+		err = btf__add_field(btf, "a", LIST_HEAD, 0, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field bar::a"))
+			break;
+		err = btf__add_field(btf, "b", LIST_NODE, 128, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field bar::b"))
+			break;
+		err = btf__add_field(btf, "c", SPIN_LOCK, 256, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field bar::c"))
+			break;
+		id = btf__add_decl_tag(btf, "contains:baz:b", 7, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 8, "btf__add_decl_tag"))
+			break;
+		id = btf__add_struct(btf, "baz", 36);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 9, "btf__add_struct baz"))
+			break;
+		err = btf__add_field(btf, "a", LIST_HEAD, 0, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field bar::a"))
+			break;
+		err = btf__add_field(btf, "b", LIST_NODE, 128, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field bar::b"))
+			break;
+		err = btf__add_field(btf, "c", SPIN_LOCK, 256, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field bar::c"))
+			break;
+		id = btf__add_decl_tag(btf, "contains:bam:a", 9, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 10, "btf__add_decl_tag contains:bam:a"))
+			break;
+		id = btf__add_struct(btf, "bam", 16);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(id, 11, "btf__add_struct bam"))
+			break;
+		err = btf__add_field(btf, "a", LIST_NODE, 0, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf__add_field bam::a"))
+			break;
+
+		err = btf__load_into_kernel(btf);
+		ASSERT_EQ(err, -ELOOP, "check btf");
+		btf__free(btf);
+		break;
+	}
+}
+
 void test_linked_list(void)
 {
 	int i;
@@ -245,6 +729,7 @@ void test_linked_list(void)
 		test_linked_list_fail_prog(linked_list_fail_tests[i].prog_name,
 					   linked_list_fail_tests[i].err_msg);
 	}
+	test_btf();
 	test_linked_list_success(PUSH_POP, false);
 	test_linked_list_success(PUSH_POP, true);
 	test_linked_list_success(PUSH_POP_MULT, false);
-- 
2.38.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-11-18  1:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-18  1:55 [PATCH bpf-next v10 00/24] Allocated objects, BPF linked lists Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-18  1:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 01/24] bpf: Fix early return in map_check_btf Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-18  1:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 02/24] bpf: Do btf_record_free outside map_free callback Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-18  1:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 03/24] bpf: Free inner_map_meta when btf_record_dup fails Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-18  1:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 04/24] bpf: Populate field_offs for inner_map_meta Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-18  1:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 05/24] bpf: Introduce allocated objects support Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-18  1:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 06/24] bpf: Recognize lock and list fields in allocated objects Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-18  1:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 07/24] bpf: Verify ownership relationships for user BTF types Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-18  1:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 08/24] bpf: Allow locking bpf_spin_lock in allocated objects Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-18  1:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 09/24] bpf: Allow locking bpf_spin_lock global variables Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-18  1:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 10/24] bpf: Allow locking bpf_spin_lock in inner map values Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-18  1:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 11/24] bpf: Rewrite kfunc argument handling Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-18  3:34   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-11-18 10:37     ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-18 18:02       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-11-18 19:00         ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-18 18:08       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-11-18 19:40   ` David Vernet
2022-11-20 19:25     ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-18  1:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 12/24] bpf: Support constant scalar arguments for kfuncs Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-18  1:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 13/24] bpf: Introduce bpf_obj_new Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-18  1:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 14/24] bpf: Introduce bpf_obj_drop Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-18  1:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 15/24] bpf: Permit NULL checking pointer with non-zero fixed offset Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-18  1:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 16/24] bpf: Introduce single ownership BPF linked list API Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-21 18:34   ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-11-18  1:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 17/24] bpf: Add 'release on unlock' logic for bpf_list_push_{front,back} Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-18  1:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 18/24] bpf: Add comments for map BTF matching requirement for bpf_list_head Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-18  1:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 19/24] selftests/bpf: Add __contains macro to bpf_experimental.h Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-18  1:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 20/24] selftests/bpf: Update spinlock selftest Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-18  1:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 21/24] selftests/bpf: Add failure test cases for spin lock pairing Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-18  1:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 22/24] selftests/bpf: Add BPF linked list API tests Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2023-10-11 22:44   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-10-11 23:02     ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2023-10-20  0:15       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-10-20 14:51         ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-18  1:56 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi [this message]
2022-11-18  1:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 24/24] selftests/bpf: Temporarily disable linked list tests Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-22 17:24   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-11-18  3:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 00/24] Allocated objects, BPF linked lists patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221118015614.2013203-24-memxor@gmail.com \
    --to=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davemarchevsky@meta.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.