From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59E5AC4708D for ; Thu, 27 May 2021 04:33:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31101610CB for ; Thu, 27 May 2021 04:33:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229886AbhE0Eet (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 May 2021 00:34:49 -0400 Received: from namei.org ([65.99.196.166]:50974 "EHLO mail.namei.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229579AbhE0Eer (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 May 2021 00:34:47 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.namei.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7A544A2; Thu, 27 May 2021 04:28:11 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 14:28:11 +1000 (AEST) From: James Morris To: Ondrej Mosnacek cc: Michael Ellerman , Linux Security Module list , Steven Rostedt , Ingo Molnar , Stephen Smalley , SElinux list , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Linux FS Devel , bpf , network dev , Linux kernel mailing list , Casey Schaufler , Paul Moore Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] lockdown,selinux: avoid bogus SELinux lockdown permission checks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <3ad4fb7f-99f3-fa71-fdb2-59db751c7e2b@namei.org> References: <20210517092006.803332-1-omosnace@redhat.com> <87o8d9k4ln.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 26 May 2021, Ondrej Mosnacek wrote: > Thanks, Michael! > > James/Paul, is there anything blocking this patch from being merged? > Especially the BPF case is causing real trouble for people and the > only workaround is to broadly allow lockdown::confidentiality in the > policy. It would be good to see more signoffs/reviews, especially from Paul, but he is busy with the io_uring stuff. Let's see if anyone else can look at this in the next couple of days. -- James Morris From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5916AC47089 for ; Thu, 27 May 2021 04:40:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44D3E61003 for ; Thu, 27 May 2021 04:40:26 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 44D3E61003 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=namei.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FrFVc4zstz3082 for ; Thu, 27 May 2021 14:40:24 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=namei.org (client-ip=65.99.196.166; helo=mail.namei.org; envelope-from=jmorris@namei.org; receiver=) X-Greylist: delayed 401 seconds by postgrey-1.36 at boromir; Thu, 27 May 2021 14:40:00 AEST Received: from mail.namei.org (namei.org [65.99.196.166]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FrFV80mmnz2yY8 for ; Thu, 27 May 2021 14:39:59 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.namei.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7A544A2; Thu, 27 May 2021 04:28:11 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 14:28:11 +1000 (AEST) From: James Morris To: Ondrej Mosnacek Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] lockdown,selinux: avoid bogus SELinux lockdown permission checks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <3ad4fb7f-99f3-fa71-fdb2-59db751c7e2b@namei.org> References: <20210517092006.803332-1-omosnace@redhat.com> <87o8d9k4ln.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Paul Moore , SElinux list , Stephen Smalley , Linux kernel mailing list , Steven Rostedt , Casey Schaufler , Linux Security Module list , Ingo Molnar , network dev , Linux FS Devel , bpf , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Wed, 26 May 2021, Ondrej Mosnacek wrote: > Thanks, Michael! > > James/Paul, is there anything blocking this patch from being merged? > Especially the BPF case is causing real trouble for people and the > only workaround is to broadly allow lockdown::confidentiality in the > policy. It would be good to see more signoffs/reviews, especially from Paul, but he is busy with the io_uring stuff. Let's see if anyone else can look at this in the next couple of days. -- James Morris