Re: [PATCH v7 0/2] Balanced allocation of hugepages

[Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@samsung.com>]

So, what do you think about this version?
Is it ready for merge or some additional changes needed?

Best regards, Ilya Maximets.

On 21.06.2017 13:08, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> Version 7:
> 	* RTE_LIBRTE_EAL_NUMA_AWARE_HUGEPAGES --> RTE_EAL_NUMA_AWARE_HUGEPAGES
> 
> Version 6:
> 	* Configuration option RTE_LIBRTE_EAL_NUMA_AWARE_HUGEPAGES
> 	  returned. Enabled by default for x86, ppc and thunderx.
> 
> Version 5:
> 	* Fixed shared build. (Automated build test will fail
> 	  anyway because libnuma-devel not installed on build servers)
> 
> Version 4:
> 	* Fixed work on systems without NUMA by adding check for NUMA
> 	  support in kernel.
> 
> Version 3:
> 	* Implemented hybrid schema for allocation.
> 	* Fixed not needed mempolicy change while remapping. (orig = 0)
> 	* Added patch to enable VHOST_NUMA by default.
> 
> Version 2:
> 	* rebased (fuzz in Makefile)
> 
> Ilya Maximets (2):
>   mem: balanced allocation of hugepages
>   config: enable vhost numa awareness by default
> 
>  config/common_base                           |   1 +
>  config/common_linuxapp                       |   3 +
>  config/defconfig_arm-armv7a-linuxapp-gcc     |   4 +
>  config/defconfig_arm64-armv8a-linuxapp-gcc   |   4 +
>  config/defconfig_arm64-thunderx-linuxapp-gcc |   4 +
>  lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/Makefile         |   3 +
>  lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_memory.c     | 105 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  mk/rte.app.mk                                |   3 +
>  8 files changed, 123 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>