All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andre Tomt <andre@tomt.net>
To: Michael Evans <mjevans1983@gmail.com>
Cc: Spelic <spelic@shiftmail.org>, linux-raid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Low cost PCI-E unRAID - Supermicro AOC-SASLP-MV8 Driver/LBA questions for HW owners/users
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 03:44:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D3B9617.9010800@tomt.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D3B6B05.1020303@shiftmail.org>

On 01/23/2011 12:40 AM, Spelic wrote:
> On 01/22/2011 09:36 PM, Michael Evans wrote:
>>
>> Also, you are half right about this being a 'dream' system. For years
>> I've been using a carefully selected 6 port motherboard, and 3 PCI-e
>> 1x cards to get a total of 12 ports.
>
> So you are trying to reach 12 ports?
> C'mon don't be cheap, there are lightning-fast 16-ports HBA controllers
> from LSI, at 6.0gbit/sec, $350 or so. $25 per port is not much; it is
> much less than the cost of the disk you are attaching to it.
> This frees you from the choice of the mainboard, and this is important,
> firstly because you can save $$$ in there, and secondly because if the
> mainboard fails, what are you going to do? you are going to buy another
> one with 6 ports? Difficult to find... and expensive also.
> Also using 2 different controllers for your disks (part from mainboard,
> part from addon card) is a bit of pain in the *** for administration
> things, also performances would be the slowest of the two for every
> request.

Since we're talking about "non hardware raid" usage, I don't really 
understand how it would be harder to manage mixed controllers? Care to 
explain? I can't quite get the performance statement to compute, 
either.. Its not like the same I/O goes out to all controllers. If your 
other controller is slower, just put fewer drives on it. Balance it out.

Anyways, If you settle for SATA and a desktop motherboard, most mid to 
high end s1156/1155 motherboards nowadays are fitted with 6 to 8 SATA 
ports. They're in now way hard to come by - even 8 ports seems to be 
available at $130 (I spent 10 seconds looking on newegg). But then again 
not all of them will *boot* off 3TB drives - at least many of the 1156 ones.

As for on board performance, integrated Intel ICH's AHCI controllers 
tend to top out at around 750MB/s aggregate. 6 ports are usually on the 
Intel, the rest on some AHCI compatible chip from Marvell. In general 
you can expect around 1GB/s aggregated from the on board controllers at 
the same time on a standard socket 1156/1155 desktop class intel chipset 
based motherboard.

Regarding the AOC-SASLP-MV8, yes, they're not worth it - the mvsas 
driver is still buggy when used with SATA. I have heaps of issues with 
mine - at least when using Seagate 7200.11 1.5TB drives on 2.6.36.3. 
Keeps stalling and throwing IO errors (no corruption yet, though). The 
card also tops out at ~700MB/s aggregate - and we can't have any of that 
can we ;-)

So yeah, the LSI based cards are seems like a good bet if you go the SAS 
HBA route. Even the previous 3Gb/s generation can do a cool 
1600-1700MB/s if you give them 8 pcie lanes. If he ever plan to expand 
into expander (he he) territory, that bandwidth is good to have. Well, 
in a "dream system" anyway, any normal workloads are generally more 
random and much, much lower in throughput. But hey, we're going for 
bragging rights here, right? :-)

  reply	other threads:[~2011-01-23  2:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-21 16:00 Low cost PCI-E unRAID - Supermicro AOC-SASLP-MV8 Driver/LBA questions for HW owners/users Michael Evans
2011-01-21 19:04 ` Stan Hoeppner
2011-01-22  5:50   ` Michael Evans
2011-01-22 16:04     ` Stan Hoeppner
2011-01-22 20:36       ` Michael Evans
2011-01-22 22:42         ` Matt Garman
2011-01-22 23:40         ` Spelic
2011-01-23  2:44           ` Andre Tomt [this message]
2011-01-23  3:19             ` Michael Evans
2011-01-23  4:00             ` Spelic
2011-01-24 11:45               ` Sven Eschenberg
2011-01-23  0:49         ` Stan Hoeppner
     [not found]           ` <4D3C64CB.2080002@harddata.com>
     [not found]             ` <4D3C9C94.8090607@hardwarefreak.com>
     [not found]               ` <4D3CB72E.3050000@harddata.com>
2011-01-24  1:52                 ` Stan Hoeppner
2011-01-24  3:28                   ` John Robinson
2011-01-24 11:27                     ` Mark Knecht
2011-01-24 11:56                       ` John Robinson
2011-01-24 23:09                         ` Leslie Rhorer
2011-01-24 22:06                     ` Leslie Rhorer
2011-01-25 18:30                       ` Maurice Hilarius
2011-01-25 20:00                         ` Stan Hoeppner
2011-01-24 21:58           ` Leslie Rhorer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D3B9617.9010800@tomt.net \
    --to=andre@tomt.net \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjevans1983@gmail.com \
    --cc=spelic@shiftmail.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.