All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Charles Wang <muming.wq@gmail.com>
To: Doug Smythies <dsmythies@telus.net>
Cc: "'Peter Zijlstra'" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"'Yong Zhang'" <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "'Ingo Molnar'" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"'Tao Ma'" <tm@tao.ma>, '含黛' <handai.szj@taobao.com>,
	"'Thomas Gleixner'" <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Folding nohz load accounting more accurate
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 14:35:40 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FE2C0BC.6020002@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <002301cd4f64$17a055c0$46e10140$@net>

On Thursday, June 21, 2012 12:12 PM, Doug Smythies wrote:

> 
>>> On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 08:50 -0700, Doug Smythies wrote:
>>  On 2012.06.20 02:45 -0700, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
>>> My automated 63 hour test has been terminated, the code changed
>>> and the test re-started. 
> 
>> There's another boo-boo in there:
> 
> O.K. I let the automated test finish the 3 processes stuff
> (which is 1/2 way).
> The newly compiled code is now running, but I only resumed
> the test, I did not re-start it.
> 
> A comparative graph of the 1 & 2 process results is attached.
> (the previous version of this same graph was on another thread).
> Legend:
> Control: older kernel compiled with CONFIG_NO_HZ=no
> c308: Kernel with the earlier commit
> 5aaa: Basically, Kernel 3.5 RC2
> Wang: Charles Wang's first proposed solution.
> Peter35: Peter Zijlstra's current proposed solution.
> 
> Summary: Extremely good.
> 


Finally resolved!!   ^____^

  reply	other threads:[~2012-06-21  6:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-09 10:54 [PATCH] sched: Folding nohz load accounting more accurate Charles Wang
2012-06-11 15:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
     [not found]   ` <4FD6BFC4.1060302@gmail.com>
2012-06-12  8:54     ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-12  9:34   ` Charles Wang
2012-06-12  9:56     ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-13  5:55       ` Doug Smythies
2012-06-13  7:56         ` Charles Wang
2012-06-14  4:41           ` Doug Smythies
2012-06-14 15:42             ` Charles Wang
2012-06-16  6:42               ` Doug Smythies
2012-06-13  8:16         ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-13 15:33           ` Doug Smythies
2012-06-13 21:57             ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-14  3:13               ` Doug Smythies
2012-06-18 10:13                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-07-20 19:24         ` sched: care and feeding of load-avg code (Re: [PATCH] sched: Folding nohz load accounting more accurate) Jonathan Nieder
2012-06-15 14:27       ` [PATCH] sched: Folding nohz load accounting more accurate Charles Wang
2012-06-15 17:39         ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-16 14:53           ` Doug Smythies
2012-06-18  6:41             ` Doug Smythies
2012-06-18 14:41               ` Charles Wang
2012-06-18 10:06           ` Charles Wang
2012-06-18 16:03         ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-19  6:08           ` Yong Zhang
2012-06-19  9:18             ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-19 15:50               ` Doug Smythies
2012-06-20  9:45                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-21  4:12                   ` Doug Smythies
2012-06-21  6:35                     ` Charles Wang [this message]
2012-06-21  8:48                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-22 14:03                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-24 21:45                       ` Doug Smythies
2012-07-03 16:01                         ` Doug Smythies
2012-06-25  2:15                       ` Charles Wang
2012-07-06  6:19                       ` [tip:sched/core] sched/nohz: Rewrite and fix load-avg computation -- again tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-19  6:19           ` [PATCH] sched: Folding nohz load accounting more accurate Doug Smythies
2012-06-19  6:24           ` Charles Wang
2012-06-19  9:57             ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FE2C0BC.6020002@gmail.com \
    --to=muming.wq@gmail.com \
    --cc=dsmythies@telus.net \
    --cc=handai.szj@taobao.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tm@tao.ma \
    --cc=yong.zhang0@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.