From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60394) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SozNJ-0002do-7p for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 12:02:50 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SozNC-000421-JN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 12:02:48 -0400 Received: from mail-gg0-f173.google.com ([209.85.161.173]:62259) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SozNC-00041b-CJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 12:02:42 -0400 Received: by ggnp1 with SMTP id p1so1476817ggn.4 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 09:02:40 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <4FFDA399.9030901@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 18:02:33 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1339772759-31004-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <1339772759-31004-7-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <4FDB71C1.6050807@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4FDB71C1.6050807@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 06/36] qmp: add block-job-pause and block-job-resume List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Blake Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com, lcapitulino@redhat.com Il 15/06/2012 19:32, Eric Blake ha scritto: > Just so I'm clear, am I right that: > > calling block-job-pause multiple times means the subsequent calls are > successful no-ops; likewise, calling block-job-resume on a job not > paused (whether by calling multiple times, or if the job never paused in > the first place) is a successful no-op. Yes, the calls do not cumulate. Paolo