All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
To: Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@nvidia.com>
Cc: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>, mptcp@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 2/3] mptcp: Fix out of bounds when parsing TCP options
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 14:09:43 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4fee0cc-6928-2ae6-fa1d-134f5787cbe@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <82474768-2c86-b2b7-afeb-30618b2ce094@linux.intel.com>

On Thu, 10 Jun 2021, Mat Martineau wrote:

> On Thu, 10 Jun 2021, Maxim Mikityanskiy wrote:
>
>> The TCP option parser in mptcp (mptcp_get_options) could read one byte
>> out of bounds. When the length is 1, the execution flow gets into the
>> loop, reads one byte of the opcode, and if the opcode is neither
>> TCPOPT_EOL nor TCPOPT_NOP, it reads one more byte, which exceeds the
>> length of 1.
>> 
>> This fix is inspired by commit 9609dad263f8 ("ipv4: tcp_input: fix stack
>> out of bounds when parsing TCP options.").
>> 
>> Cc: Young Xiao <92siuyang@gmail.com>
>> Fixes: cec37a6e41aa ("mptcp: Handle MP_CAPABLE options for outgoing 
>> connections")
>> Signed-off-by: Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@nvidia.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> net/mptcp/options.c | 2 ++
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>> 
>> diff --git a/net/mptcp/options.c b/net/mptcp/options.c
>> index 6b825fb3fa83..9b263f27ce9b 100644
>> --- a/net/mptcp/options.c
>> +++ b/net/mptcp/options.c
>> @@ -356,6 +356,8 @@ void mptcp_get_options(const struct sk_buff *skb,
>> 			length--;
>> 			continue;
>> 		default:
>> +			if (length < 2)
>> +				return;
>> 			opsize = *ptr++;
>> 			if (opsize < 2) /* "silly options" */
>> 				return;
>> -- 
>> 2.25.1
>
> Matthieu -
>
> Could you apply this in mptcp_net-next so it's easier to track when the patch 
> finds its way to net-next?
>
> (MPTCP patchwork status set to "queued")

And to clarify for Maxim: we have a separate MPTCP git tree where we stage 
MPTCP changes before submitting to net- or net-next. For your patch set 
that has related changes across a few networking subsystems, sending 
directly to netdev is the best thing to do.

We do have other queued changes for netdev so I think it would work well 
to include this patch in our tree now, and it will automatically disappear 
once it is fully merged upstream. Sometimes it takes a couple of weeks for 
the net/master branch to get merged in to net-next/master.

--
Mat Martineau
Intel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-10 21:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-10 16:40 [PATCH net v2 0/3] Fix out of bounds when parsing TCP options Maxim Mikityanskiy
2021-06-10 16:40 ` [PATCH net v2 1/3] netfilter: synproxy: " Maxim Mikityanskiy
2021-06-10 16:43   ` Florian Westphal
2021-06-10 16:40 ` [PATCH net v2 2/3] mptcp: " Maxim Mikityanskiy
2021-06-10 21:03   ` Mat Martineau
2021-06-10 21:09     ` Mat Martineau [this message]
2021-06-11 14:30     ` Matthieu Baerts
2021-06-10 16:40 ` [PATCH net v2 3/3] sch_cake: Fix out of bounds when parsing TCP options and header Maxim Mikityanskiy
2021-06-10 21:50 ` [PATCH net v2 0/3] Fix out of bounds when parsing TCP options patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4fee0cc-6928-2ae6-fa1d-134f5787cbe@linux.intel.com \
    --to=mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=matthieu.baerts@tessares.net \
    --cc=maximmi@nvidia.com \
    --cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.