All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: Wiktor Wodecki <wodecki@gmx.net>
Cc: Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au>,
	Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>,
	Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>,
	linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	Felipe Alfaro Solana <felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org>,
	Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] O6int for interactivity
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 17:46:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5.2.1.1.2.20030718174433.01b12878@pop.gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030718103105.GE622@gmx.de>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 918 bytes --]

At 12:31 PM 7/18/2003 +0200, Wiktor Wodecki wrote:
>On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 12:18:33PM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > That _might_ (add salt) be priorities of kernel threads dropping too low.
> >
> > I'm also seeing occasional total stalls under heavy I/O in the order of
> > 10-12 seconds (even the disk stops).  I have no idea if that's 
> something in
> > mm or the scheduler changes though, as I've yet to do any isolation and/or
> > tinkering.  All I know at this point is that I haven't seen it in stock 
> yet.
>
>I've seen this too while doing a huge nfs transfer from a 2.6 machine to
>a 2.4 machine (sparc32). Thought it'd be something with the nfs changes
>which were recently, might be the scheduler, tho. Ah, and it is fully
>reproducable.

Telling to not mess with my kernel threads seems to have fixed it here... 
no stalls during the whole contest run.  New contest numbers attached.

         -Mike 

[-- Attachment #2: contest.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3778 bytes --]

no_load:
Kernel           [runs]	Time	CPU%	Loads	LCPU%	Ratio
2.5.69                1	153	94.8	0.0	0.0	1.00
2.5.70                1	153	94.1	0.0	0.0	1.00
2.6.0-test1           1	153	94.1	0.0	0.0	1.00
2.6.0-test1-mm1       1	152	94.7	0.0	0.0	1.00
2.6.0-test1-mm1X      1	153	94.8	0.0	0.0	1.00
cacherun:
Kernel           [runs]	Time	CPU%	Loads	LCPU%	Ratio
2.5.69                1	146	98.6	0.0	0.0	0.95
2.5.70                1	146	98.6	0.0	0.0	0.95
2.6.0-test1           1	146	98.6	0.0	0.0	0.95
2.6.0-test1-mm1       1	146	98.6	0.0	0.0	0.96
2.6.0-test1-mm1X      1	146	98.6	0.0	0.0	0.95
process_load:
Kernel           [runs]	Time	CPU%	Loads	LCPU%	Ratio
2.5.69                1	331	43.8	90.0	55.3	2.16
2.5.70                1	199	72.4	27.0	25.5	1.30
2.6.0-test1           1	264	54.5	61.0	44.3	1.73
2.6.0-test1-mm1       1	323	44.9	88.0	54.2	2.12
2.6.0-test1-mm1X      1	268	54.1	62.0	44.8	1.75
ctar_load:
Kernel           [runs]	Time	CPU%	Loads	LCPU%	Ratio
2.5.69                1	190	77.9	0.0	0.0	1.24
2.5.70                1	186	80.1	0.0	0.0	1.22
2.6.0-test1           1	213	70.4	0.0	0.0	1.39
2.6.0-test1-mm1       1	207	72.5	0.0	0.0	1.36
2.6.0-test1-mm1X      1	213	70.4	0.0	0.0	1.39
xtar_load:
Kernel           [runs]	Time	CPU%	Loads	LCPU%	Ratio
2.5.69                1	196	75.0	0.0	3.1	1.28
2.5.70                1	195	75.9	0.0	3.1	1.27
2.6.0-test1           1	193	76.7	1.0	4.1	1.26
2.6.0-test1-mm1       1	195	75.9	1.0	4.1	1.28
2.6.0-test1-mm1X      1	191	77.5	1.0	4.2	1.25
io_load:
Kernel           [runs]	Time	CPU%	Loads	LCPU%	Ratio
2.5.69                1	437	34.6	69.1	15.1	2.86
2.5.70                1	401	37.7	72.3	17.4	2.62
2.6.0-test1           1	243	61.3	48.1	17.3	1.59
2.6.0-test1-mm1       1	336	44.9	64.5	17.3	2.21
2.6.0-test1-mm1X      1	317	47.3	63.5	17.7	2.07
io_other:
Kernel           [runs]	Time	CPU%	Loads	LCPU%	Ratio
2.5.69                1	387	38.8	69.3	17.3	2.53
2.5.70                1	422	36.0	75.3	17.1	2.76
2.6.0-test1           1	258	57.8	55.8	19.0	1.69
2.6.0-test1-mm1       1	330	45.5	63.2	17.2	2.17
2.6.0-test1-mm1X      1	302	49.7	59.1	17.2	1.97
read_load:
Kernel           [runs]	Time	CPU%	Loads	LCPU%	Ratio
2.5.69                1	221	67.0	9.4	3.6	1.44
2.5.70                1	220	67.3	9.4	3.6	1.44
2.6.0-test1           1	200	74.0	9.7	4.0	1.31
2.6.0-test1-mm1       1	190	78.4	9.2	4.2	1.25
2.6.0-test1-mm1X      1	187	79.7	8.4	3.7	1.22
list_load:
Kernel           [runs]	Time	CPU%	Loads	LCPU%	Ratio
2.5.69                1	203	71.4	99.0	20.2	1.33
2.5.70                1	205	70.7	104.0	20.5	1.34
2.6.0-test1           1	199	72.4	102.0	21.6	1.30
2.6.0-test1-mm1       1	193	75.1	91.0	19.7	1.27
2.6.0-test1-mm1X      1	194	74.7	91.0	19.6	1.27
mem_load:
Kernel           [runs]	Time	CPU%	Loads	LCPU%	Ratio
2.5.69                1	256	57.8	34.0	1.2	1.67
2.5.70                1	252	58.7	33.0	1.2	1.65
2.6.0-test1           1	309	48.2	75.0	2.3	2.02
2.6.0-test1-mm1       1	277	53.8	38.0	1.4	1.82
2.6.0-test1-mm1X      1	225	65.8	38.0	1.8	1.47
dbench_load:
Kernel           [runs]	Time	CPU%	Loads	LCPU%	Ratio
2.5.69                1	517	28.8	5.0	35.6	3.38
2.5.70                1	424	35.1	3.0	26.7	2.77
2.6.0-test1           1	347	42.7	4.0	39.5	2.27
2.6.0-test1-mm1       1	377	39.8	4.0	36.9	2.48
2.6.0-test1-mm1X      1	510	29.4	5.0	34.3	3.33
ab_load:
Kernel           [runs]	Time	CPU%	Loads	LCPU%	Ratio
2.5.69                1	300	48.3	46.0	21.7	1.96
2.5.70                1	300	48.0	46.0	22.0	1.96
2.6.0-test1           1	281	51.6	50.0	25.6	1.84
2.6.0-test1-mm1       1	229	63.3	30.0	18.3	1.51
2.6.0-test1-mm1X      1	225	64.4	27.0	18.2	1.47
irman2_load:
Kernel           [runs]	Time	CPU%	Loads	LCPU%	Ratio
2.6.0-test1           1	999	14.5	31.0	0.0	6.53
2.6.0-test1-mm1       1	210	69.0	6.0	0.0	1.38
2.6.0-test1-mm1X      1	210	69.0	6.0	0.0	1.37

  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-07-18 15:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-07-16 14:30 [PATCH] O6int for interactivity Con Kolivas
2003-07-16 15:22 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2003-07-16 19:55   ` Marc-Christian Petersen
2003-07-16 17:08 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-07-16 21:59 ` Wiktor Wodecki
2003-07-16 22:30   ` Con Kolivas
2003-07-16 22:12 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-17  0:33   ` Con Kolivas
2003-07-17  0:35     ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-17  1:12       ` Con Kolivas
2003-07-17  0:48     ` Wade
2003-07-17  1:15       ` Con Kolivas
2003-07-17  1:27         ` Eugene Teo
2003-07-17  3:05 ` Wes Janzen
2003-07-17  9:05 ` Alex Riesen
2003-07-17  9:14   ` Con Kolivas
2003-07-18  7:38     ` Alex Riesen
     [not found]       ` <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307251628500.26172-300000@localhost.localdomain>
2003-07-25 19:40         ` Alex Riesen
     [not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.55.0307161241280.4787@bigblue.dev.mcafeelabs.co m>
2003-07-18  5:38   ` Mike Galbraith
2003-07-18  6:34     ` Nick Piggin
2003-07-18 10:18       ` Mike Galbraith
2003-07-18 10:31         ` Wiktor Wodecki
2003-07-18 10:43           ` Con Kolivas
2003-07-18 11:34             ` Wiktor Wodecki
2003-07-18 11:38               ` Nick Piggin
2003-07-19 10:59                 ` Wiktor Wodecki
2003-07-18 15:46           ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2003-07-18 16:52             ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-18 17:05               ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-18 17:39                 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-07-18 19:31                   ` Davide Libenzi
     [not found]                 ` <Pine.LNX.4.55.0307181038450.5608@bigblue.dev.mcafeelabs.co m>
2003-07-18 20:31                   ` Mike Galbraith
2003-07-18 20:38                     ` Davide Libenzi
     [not found]                 ` <Pine.LNX.4.55.0307181333520.5608@bigblue.dev.mcafeelabs.co m>
2003-07-19 17:04                   ` Mike Galbraith
2003-07-21  0:21                     ` Davide Libenzi
     [not found]                 ` <Pine.LNX.4.55.0307201715130.3548@bigblue.dev.mcafeelabs.co m>
2003-07-21  5:36                   ` Mike Galbraith
2003-07-21 12:39                   ` [NOTAPATCH] " Mike Galbraith
2003-07-21 17:13                     ` Mike Galbraith
2003-07-18 14:24         ` Con Kolivas
2003-07-18 15:50           ` Mike Galbraith
2003-07-18 13:46     ` Davide Libenzi
     [not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.55.0307180630450.5077@bigblue.dev.mcafeelabs.co m>
2003-07-18 15:41   ` Mike Galbraith
     [not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.55.0307180951050.5608@bigblue.dev.mcafeelabs.co m>
2003-07-18 18:49   ` Mike Galbraith
2003-07-16 20:20 Shane Shrybman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5.2.1.1.2.20030718174433.01b12878@pop.gmx.net \
    --to=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
    --cc=felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org \
    --cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=piggin@cyberone.com.au \
    --cc=wodecki@gmx.net \
    --cc=zwane@arm.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.