From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: FIFO-based event channel ABI design (draft B)
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:16:39 +0000
Message-ID: <51228C27.7050000@citrix.com>
References: <511E46FD.3010605@citrix.com>
	<1361200766.1051.5.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <1361200766.1051.5.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 18/02/13 15:19, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 14:32 +0000, David Vrabel wrote:
>> Except for a lack of information of the required memory barriers (to be
>> included in draft C), this should now be completely enough to start on a
>> prototype (any volunteers? ;).
> 
> I think the real question is whether you as creator of the design are
> going to be working on the implementation. That would the usual
> progression of things.

Yes, but I can't work on it full-time.

David